Friday, September 29, 2006

Problem of being anti-status quo

In my opinion, in most of the Muslim countries, the worst problem is not the status quo but that the only viable anti-status quo force there are the Islamists. Sadly, it also suits the "enlightened moderate" rulers of Muslim world who have left no stone unturned to weaken the secular opposition to prove their credentials as the sole only antidote to radical Islam.

Some extracts from the article below. The article(http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/3044) is worth reading in spite of the author.

Fascism is most effectively fought through an extension of liberties, the creation and/or strengthening of political institutions. There can be no compromise with fascism, no give and take, no quest for consensus. Those who think they can ally themselves with fascism to win power against a regime that they do not like, have not heard the proverb about falling from the frying pan into the fire. Many of the intellectuals that the Shah used to put in detention for brief periods were shot, jailed or driven into exile by Khomeini despite the fact that they had signed the "devil's pact" with him or, may be, because they had. They did not realise, or did not wish to realise, that freedom, democracy and human rights are incompatible with fascism. They fought a regime that they disliked, rightly or wrongly, by supporting a movement which they should have disliked even more intensely. They did not realise that those who use religion as their stock-in-trade cannot offer pluralism and democracy even if they tried. The ayatollah, the Pope, the Hindu gurus or the Dalai Lama have no freedom and democracy to offer.

The first lesson that Muslim intellectuals must learn from the Iranian experience is that that ought to be themselves. They should not abandon their core political beliefs to forge an alliance with the fascists. Today, most regimes in the Muslim world are corrupt and despotic and, thus, must be fought as enemies of their people. But one must always fight them from positions that are more human, more progressive and more democratic than those of the regime in place. To try and bring down a bad regime only to replace it with something much worse is a costly error that I hope will not be repeated by intellectuals in other Muslim countries.
There are some conflicting reports coming out about General Mahmood, ex-DG of ISI. In one report, he is described as a chicken-hearted fellow who accepted all the demands of Americans right off the bat without any ifs and buts, after 9/11. In other reports, we are told he was the Islamist zealot who gave a pat on the back of Mullah Umar to "stay firm and stand up to Crusader USA". Which version is closer to truth (or perhaps both are far from truth), perhaps we may not be able to know soon.


http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\09\26\story_26-9-2006_pg7_13

Thursday, September 28, 2006

People coming late in office, leaving earlier, an atmosphere of lethargy everwhere.

As things stand in Pakistan, the Holy Month looks like a "Holiday Month". Welcome to Ramadhan :)



http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2005\10\13\story_13-10-2005_pg3_2

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

I once read somewhere that essence of all Christian teachings is"Love" and that of Islam is "Justice". And unlike "Love", "Justice"is not a matter of private relation - but that of social and legalenforcement. Hence, the Christian approval of secularism and Islamic dismissal of it. Some writers consider Christianity as "orthodox"religion (occupied with the dogma - instead of daily life matters)and Islam and Judaism as "orthoprax" religions i.e. their empahsis onoutward forms and rituals and laws. Clearly, the idea of separation ofstate and church is alien to Islam and Judaism - however, over theyears, Jews have developed a strong culture of intellectual skepticismthat has substantially watered down the "Orthodox" version of theirreligion. That's not the case with Muslims, unfortunately!In theory, both Christianity and Islam have libertarian as wellauthoritarian tendencies.
Re Christanity:

1. Render unto God what's God's and render unto Ceaser what'sCaesar's.(libertarianism)

2. Only the Holy Father has the right to interpret what is to renderedto God and Caesar (totalitarianism)

Re Islam,

1. God, not man, is the lawmaker. (totalitarianism)

2. There is no intermediary between man and God and every Muslim isfree to interpret the word of God. (libertarianism)

The devil lies in details (of practice). As remarked by Steve Sailer,if a Martian's entire knowledge of the world came from reading theBible, he would be bound to deduce, after hearing the thundering,angry voice of the Old Testament Jehovah, and reading of theconquests of Joshua, Gideon and David, followed by the gentle wordsof Christ and St. Paul, that those warlike, fighting Jews must havebeen kicking around the meek, cheek-turning Christians for the last2,000 years.

Or as someone said: "In theory, there is no difference between theoryand practice, but in practice, there is."

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Land of opportunities

America is rightly called the "land of opportunities". That also includes the opportunity to play around with words. "Dating" is "matrimonial banquet" and "arranged marriage" is "assisted marriage" but "fun" is still "sin". Not a bad attempt to reconcile tradition and modernity, and get the best of the both worlds. :)



http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/us/19dating.html


September 19, 2006
It's Muslim Boy Meets Girl, but Don't Call It Dating
By NEIL MacFARQUHAR

CHICAGO — So here's the thing about speed dating for Muslims.

Many American Muslims — or at least those bent on maintaining certain conservative traditions — equate anything labeled "dating" with hellfire, no matter how short a time is involved. Hence the wildly popular speed dating sessions at the largest annual Muslim conference in North America were given an entirely more respectable label. They were called the "matrimonial banquet."

"If we called it speed dating, it will end up with real dating," said Shamshad Hussain, one of the organizers, grimacing.

Both the banquet earlier this month and various related seminars underscored the difficulty that some American Muslim families face in grappling with an issue on which many prefer not to assimilate. One seminar, called "Dating," promised attendees helpful hints for "Muslim families struggling to save their children from it."

The couple of hundred people attending the dating seminar burst out laughing when Imam Muhamed Magid of the Adams Center, a collective of seven mosques in Virginia, summed up the basic instructions that Muslim American parents give their adolescent children, particularly males: "Don't talk to the Muslim girls, ever, but you are going to marry them. As for the non-Muslim girls, talk to them, but don't ever bring one home."

"These kids grew up in America, where the social norm is that it is O.K. to date, that it is O.K. to have sex before marriage," Imam Magid said in an interview. "So the kids are caught between the ideal of their parents and the openness of the culture on this issue."

The questions raised at the seminar reflected just how pained many American Muslims are by the subject. One middle-aged man wondered if there was anything he could do now that his 32-year-old son had declared his intention of marrying a (shudder) Roman Catholic. A young man asked what might be considered going too far when courting a Muslim woman.

Panelists warned that even seemingly innocuous e-mail exchanges or online dating could topple one off the Islamic path if one lacked vigilance. "All of these are traps of the Devil to pull us in and we have no idea we are even going that way," said Ameena Jandali, the moderator of the dating seminar.

Hence the need to come up with acceptable alternatives in North America, particularly for families from Pakistan, India and Bangladesh, where there is a long tradition of arranged marriages.

One panelist, Yasmeen Qadri, suggested that Muslim mothers across the continent band together in an organization called "Mothers Against Dating," modeled on Mothers Against Drunk Driving. If the term "arranged marriage" is too distasteful to the next generation, she said, then perhaps the practice could be Americanized simply by renaming it "assisted marriage," just like assisted living for the elderly.

"In the United States we can play with words however we want, but we are not trying to set aside our cultural values," said Mrs. Qadri, a professor of education.

Basically, for conservative Muslims, dating is a euphemism for premarital sex. Anyone who partakes risks being considered morally louche, with their marriage prospects dimming accordingly, particularly young women.

Mrs. Qadri and other panelists see a kind of hybrid version emerging in the United States, where the young do choose their own mates, but the parents are at least partly involved in the process in something like half the cases.

Having the families involved can help reduce the divorce rate, Imam Majid said, citing a recent informal study that indicated that one third of Muslim marriages in the United States end in divorce. It was still far too high, he noted, but lower than the overall American average. Intermarriages outside Islam occur, but remain relatively rare, he said.

Scores of parents showed up at the marriage banquet to chaperone their children. Many had gone through arranged marriages — meeting the bride or groom chosen by their parents sometimes as late as their wedding day and hoping for the best. They recognize that the tradition is untenable in the United States, but still want to influence the process.
The banquet is considered one preferable alternative to going online, although that too is becoming more common. The event was unquestionably one of the big draws at the Islamic Society of North America's annual convention, which attracted thousands of Muslims to Chicago over Labor Day weekend, with many participants bemoaning the relatively small pool of eligible candidates even in large cities.

There were two banquets, with a maximum 150 men and 150 women participating each day for $55 apiece. They sat 10 per table and the men rotated every seven minutes.

At the end there was an hourlong social hour that allowed participants time to collect e-mail addresses and telephone numbers over a pasta dinner with sodas. (Given the Muslim ban on alcohol, no one could soothe jumpy nerves with a drink.) Organizers said many of the women still asked men to approach their families first. Some families accept that the couple can then meet in public, some do not.

A few years ago the organizers were forced to establish a limit of one parent per participant and bar them from the tables until the social hour because so many interfered. Parents are now corralled along one edge of the reception hall, where they alternate between craning their necks to see who their adult children are meeting or horse-trading bios, photographs and telephone numbers among themselves.

Talking to the mothers — and participants with a parent usually take a mother — is like surveying members of the varsity suddenly confined to the bleachers.

"To know someone for seven minutes is not enough," scoffed Awila Siddique, 46, convinced she was making better contacts via the other mothers.

Mrs. Siddique said her shy, 20-year-old daughter spent the hours leading up to the banquet crying that her father was forcing her to do something weird. "Back home in Pakistan, the families meet first,'' she said. "You are not marrying the guy only, but his whole family."
Samia Abbas, 59 and originally from Alexandria, Egypt, bustled out to the tables as soon as social hour was called to see whom her daughter Alia, 29, had met.

"I'm her mother so of course I'm looking for her husband," said Mrs. Abbas, ticking off the qualities she was looking for, including a good heart, handsome, as highly educated as her daughter and a good Muslim.

Did he have to be Egyptian?

"She's desperate for anyone!" laughed Alia, a vivacious technology manager for a New York firm, noting that the "Made in Egypt" stipulation had long since been cast overboard.
"Her cousin who is younger has babies now!" exclaimed the mother, dialing relatives on her cellphone to handicap potential candidates.

For doubters, organizers produced a success story, a strikingly good-looking pair of Chicago doctors who met at the banquet two years ago. Organizers boast of at least 25 marriages over the past six years.

Fatima Alim, 50, was disappointed when her son Suehaib, a 26-year-old pharmacist, did not meet anyone special on the first day. They had flown up from Houston especially for the event, and she figured chances were 50-50 that he would find a bride.

When she arrived in Texas as a 23-year-old in an arranged marriage, Mrs. Alim envied the girls around her, enthralled by their discussions about all the fun they were having with their boyfriends, she said, even if she was eventually shocked to learn how quickly they moved from one to the next and how easily they divorced. Still, she was determined that her children would chose their own spouses.

"We want a good, moderate Muslim girl, not a very, very modern girl," she said. "The family values are the one thing I like better back home. Divorces are high here because of the corruption, the intermingling with other men and other women."

For his part, Mr. Alim was resisting the strong suggestion from his parents that they switch tactics and start looking for a nice girl back in Pakistan. Many of the participants reject that approach, describing themselves as too Americanized — plus the visas required are far harder to obtain in the post-Sept. 11 world.

Mr. Alim said he still believed what he had been taught as a child, that sex outside marriage was among the gravest sins, but he wants to marry a fellow American Muslim no matter how hard she is to find.

"I think I can hold out a couple more years," he said in his soft Texas drawl with a boyish smile. "The sooner the better, but I think I can wait. By 30, hopefully, even if that is kind of late."

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Few months ago, Sunday Magazine of New York Times published an article about the life and works of Juan Goytisolo, a Spanish writer who is currently based in Morocco.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/magazine/16goytisolo.html?ex=1159675200&en=afb01b16c722928f&ei=5070



I've to admit it is one of the most interesting and intellectually stimulating articles I've gone through lately. I've not read any of Goytisolo's works but would love to give him a shot.



Umar

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Here's one news:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5351988.stm
"Pope Benedict XVI has said he is sorry that a speech in which he referred to Islam has offended Muslims. "

Here's a take on the Pope's stance towards Islam.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5352404.stm
Benedict XVI undoubtedly wants to achieve better relations with Islam, but there is an important proviso.

It can be summed up in a single word: reciprocity. It means that if Muslims want to enjoy religious freedom in the West, then Christians should have an equal right to follow their faith in Islamic states, without fear of persecution.




And here's another news:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5353208.stm

Security has been tightened in Rome ahead of Pope Benedict XVI's first public appearance since making comments deemed offensive by many Muslims.
............................
In the West Bank city of Nablus, two churches were firebombed on Saturday in attacks claimed by a group which said it was protesting against the Pope's remarks.





Mind boggles who is being the gratuitous offender here. As they say, actions speak louder than the words.

Friday, September 15, 2006


Muslims can be accused of being simple-minded, inward-looking and self-absorbed when they blame US and Israel for staging 9/11 attacks. But mind boggles what makes Europeans and North Americans to profess such "theories". Perhaps it's just a symptom of deep widespread distrust against the establishment .


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/07/ap/national/mainD8JBB7PG0.shtml



On the Net:

Scholars for Truth: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

Nat'l Institute of Standards: http://wtc.nist.gov/

Debunking Conspiracy Theories: http://www.debunking911.com/