Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Infidelophobia in Shiism


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRu95Fg4r70
January 21, 2009: Israel, the Jews and the Sunni-Shiite Conflict: A Symposium
Hosted by: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism


https://twitter.com/khamenei_ir/status/879252066245521408
According to Islamic jurisprudence, when an enemy takes over Muslim lands, Jihad-in any form possible-becomes everyone's duty.


http://media.rasanews.ir/Original/1396/01/17/IMG17593655.jpg
http://v0.bahjat.ir/index.php/2011-09-08-10-59-53/17-siyasi/1400-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B7-%DA%A9%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B1.html
http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/489870/2073
https://twitter.com/cybertosser/status/916012842716774400
https://twitter.com/SAMRIReports/status/1183720947645403142 
Ayatollah Bahjat: Our imams forbade us from mixing with infidels as it makes it easier for them to dominate Muslims

http://www.sibtain.com/en/Book_Qawaneen_ush_Shariya_Volume_1.aspx
Allama Muhammad Hussain Najafi on kafirs being najas






https://media.hawzahnews.com/d/2020/06/25/0/977718.pdf
“Philosophy of Islamic laws” written by Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi and Ayatollah Ja'far Subhani
...
To safeguard the beliefs of Muslims, Islam has stated the infidels to be impure, that Muslims can be stopped from intermingling with them and save their spiritual cleanliness. If the infidels were not considered impure and it was allowed to intermingle with them it was possible that many people who do not have strong faith would have been impressed from their sayings and thinking.1 Free intermingling with infidels would result in their penetrating into Islamic societies so restricting intercourse with them would protect the Muslims from any possible danger from them.
....
Now we are coming towards the real question. As it has been pointed unbelievers are unclean by a type of spiritual impurity, whose body is also unclean and they are impure, it is to protect the beliefs of people, who very soon accept the effects of others and get strayed and this is not something new. Preachers have always recommended to the common people to keep away from polluted and strayed people and after all Islam has announced that unbelievers are impure. We do consider that Islam under certain conditions gives the permission for economic, business relations but has not given the permission for eating together or in other words Islam wants that Muslims may keep relations with them and make profit and side by side remain protected from their beliefs and ethics, which can reach to the people while intermingling with them. Here it should be not misunderstood. We are not saying this that broad minded and educated people, who do not fear that by socializing with the unbelievers there will be no danger of going astray, or spoil their ethics, they can stay with them completely and are exempted from the above rule. No, it is not like that.
The orders of Islam do not have any special angle for anyone and to be sure that the limits of Shari’ah are protected. It is necessary that for the generalization of this order be maintained, because if it is not like that, then every person will assume himself to be educated and maintain relations with unbelievers and the laws and orders of the Shari’ah will be subverted. (Think for a while.) Many unbelievers do not refrain from impure things like blood, pork and alcoholic drinks; and naturally their whole life is unclean. To remain keep from those impurities Islam has announced that they are najis, so that those Muslims who by intermingling with them have the possibility of becoming impure may remain safe.


https://www.islamquest.net/en/archive/question/fa3260
 if it is said that this ruling or injunction is an insult to them, it should be said that, first of all, the reason behind Islam’s injunction about the disbelievers’ impurity could be considered as ‘politically motivated’. Thus, we can say that the purpose behind this injunction is to prevent Muslims from associating with them so that Muslims may not be influenced by their destructive thoughts. Secondly, this is a kind of punishment or penalty and it is evidently very much likely that the person who is subjected to such punishment may consider it as an insult to himself but he himself is the cause of this insult not the legislator who for underlying reasons enacted the law.

http://www.duas.org/sajjadiya/s27.htm
https://twitter.com/sumayyaka/status/558569819705188352
@bintbattuta @icomefromthere there's a great shia du'a my fam prays against israel "permit not their sky to rain nor their earth to grow"

https://twitter.com/sumayyaka/status/558570254428012545
@bintbattuta @icomefromthere "empty their hearts of security, their bodies of strength, make their limbs too feeble…"


https://youtu.be/71Z_68kjWfk?t=20m17s
Canadian mullah Syed Rizvi said Qadianism was planted by British imperialists. Qadianis supported British against both Congress and Muslim League.

http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/458979/14
حضرت آ‌یت الله سبحانی با بیان این که نباید سرنوشت را به دست کافران بدهیم و قانون نویس و خط ده ما کفار باشد، گفت
Ayatullah Sobhani, said that we should not give fate (decision-making) to the disbelievers, and that the lawmaker and the 10th line are infidels, he said.

استاد برجسته درس خارج حوزه علمیه قم با بیان این که قرآن کریم می فرماید مؤمن حق ندارد که کافر را  ولی اخذ کند، اظهار داشت: سه گونه ولایت وجود دارد، نوع اول این است که سرنوشت را به دست کافران بدهیم و قانون نویس و خط ده ما کفار باشد.

The distinguished professor of the lesson outside the Qom Seminary, saying that the Holy Quran says that the believer is not entitled to befriend the infidels, said: There are three types of 'wilayat': the first one is to give control to the disbelievers, and the legislator and the ruler Ten of us are infallible.

وی ادامه داد: کسانی که از حدود اسلام بیرون هستند نباید سرنوشت مملکت را در دست بگیرند و ما نباید آن ها را بر خود مسلط کنیم که بسیار غلط است، اگر امور دست آن ها باشد وضعیت معلوم است؛ مسأله دوم این است که انسان با فرد کافر دوست و رفیق بوده و با آن بیا و برو داشته باشد، این هم ممنوع است چون اثر می گذارد.


He added: "Those who are outside the limits of Islam should not take control of the country, and we should not let them rule them over us , which is very wrong, if the matter is at hand, the situation is known; the second is that non-Muslims is a friend and comrade and you come and go with it. It is also forbidden because it influences you

حضرت آیت الله سبحانی با بیان این که حضرت امام می فرمودند که نجاست کافر سیاسی است، ابراز داشت: وگرنه کافر هم نظافت دارد، سیاسی است چون اگر پاک باشد و ما در زندگی بخواهیم همپای او باشیم قطعا در ما اثر می گذارد.


Ayatullah Sobhani, expressing that Imam Khomeini said that the filth of a non-Muslim is of politics, expressed that: "otherwise the infidel is also clean, it is political, because if it is pure and we want to be together, it will definitely affect us."

وی عنوان کرد: مرحله سوم زندگی مسالمت آمیز است یعنی انسان ها با یکدیگر جنگ و دعوا نکنند، این مانعی ندارد؛ خداوند از این نوع نهی نمی کنند از این رو اسلام دین دوستی و صلح است و دین جنگ نیست؛ البته نباید ارتباط به گونه ای باشد که کفار در
ما اثر بگذارند

He said: "The third stage is peaceful life, that is, people do not fight with each other; this is not a problem; God does not forbid it; therefore, Islam is the religion of friendship and peace and not of war. It should not be in a way that we get influenced by them.

عقب ماندگی در علم، عامل نفوذ فرهنگی کفار در بلاد مسلمانان است

نرمش نشان دادن و به دست ‌آوردن دل کفار معنا ندارد


The backwardness in science is the cause of the infidel culture's infiltration in MuslimsIt does not make sense to show and gain the heart of the infidel


https://www.al-islam.org/philosophy-islamic-laws-nasir-makarim-shirazi-jafar-subhani/question-17-why-unbeliever-impure
 As it has been pointed unbelievers are unclean by a type of spiritual impurity, whose body is also unclean and they are impure, it is to protect the beliefs of people, who very soon accept the effects of others and get strayed and this is not something new. Preachers have always recommended to the common people to keep away from polluted and strayed people and after all Islam has announced that unbelievers are impure.
We do consider that Islam under certain conditions gives the permission for economic, business relations but has not given the permission for eating together or in other words Islam wants that Muslims may keep relations with them and make profit and side by side remain protected from their beliefs and ethics, which can reach to the people while intermingling with them.
Here it should be not misunderstood. We are not saying this that broad minded and educated people, who do not fear that by socializing with the unbelievers there will be no danger of going astray, or spoil their ethics, they can stay with them completely and are exempted from the above rule. No, it is not like that.
The orders of Islam do not have any special angle for anyone and to be sure that the limits of Shari’ah are protected. It is necessary that for the generalization of this order be maintained, because if it is not like that, then every person will assume himself to be educated and maintain relations with unbelievers and the laws and orders of the Shari’ah will be subverted. (Think for a while.)


https://www.al-islam.org/divine-perspective-on-rights-a-commentary-of-imam-sajjads-treatise-of-rights/right-n-50-right-those
https://www.al-islam.org/divine-perspective-on-rights-a-commentary-of-imam-sajjads-treatise-of-rights/right-n-50-right-those#jurisprudence-ruling-poll-tax
The poll-tax cannot be taken from those other than the people of the Book. The Qur’an says the following regarding the Pagans:
فَاقْتُلُواْ الْمُشْرِكِينَ حَيْثُ وَجَدتُّمُوهُمْ
“Then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them.” [The Holy Qur’an, al-Tawbah 9:5]
The case of the idol-worshippers is also clear. Therefore, the poll-tax can only be taken from these three groups of religious people if they adhere to the conditions of the covenant.
.....

The Conditions of the Poll-Tax

There are six conditions for the poll-tax as follows:
1 - They should accept the payment of this tax.
2 - They should not do anything that violates the conditions of submission and security such as deciding to engage in war with the Muslims.
3 - They should not hurt the Muslims, financially harm them, or sexually harass the Muslims. If any of them vilifies the Prophet , he would be killed.
4 - They should not publicly engage in the Islamically forbidden acts such as drinking wine, eating pork, or marrying those who are forbidden to marry. The covenant is violated if any such deeds are done.
5 - They should not build any synagogues in Muslim lands, ring the synagogue bell, or build their houses to be taller than the houses of the Muslims.
6 - They should be subject to the decrees of Islam.
The jurisprudents have expressed these six conditions for the poll-tax. These have been discussed in detail in books on Islamic jurisprudence. We only made a few remarks to clarify the rights of the people under the protection of Islam as expressed by Imam Sajjad .


https://ia801202.us.archive.org/3/items/TahrirAlVasilah/0000-tahrir%20j4-nA4.pdf
https://archive.org/stream/TahrirAlVasilah/0000-tahrir%20j4-nA4#page/n259/mode/2up
Khomeini's book 'Tahrir Al Wasilah' - Section 47 (Hudud), Chapter 6 - Dhimmis



https://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235018904-let-there-be-no-compulsion-in-religion/
http://english.bayynat.org/Values/Value_signification.htm#.XWZbwShKi02
[Muhammad Hussein Fadlullah (ra)]
As for the second group, it includes the polytheists and atheists with whom the Muslims can sign a treaty if so dictated by the supreme Islamic interest, according to a certain jurisprudential opinion. However, if there was no interest in such a treaty, then they cannot but be held accountable for not believing in Islam and treated as such, for Islam does not consider polytheism and atheism to be respectable faiths; but rather, they are, in every sense, against the interest of man and life. Actually, Islam was revealed for the sake of effacing any traces of atheism and polytheism through its Call of Unification (of Allah); thus, it is meaningless for Islam to coexist with them on the basis of mutual respect, for it would actually be granting freedom to its opposite [in all senses], although that is considered - according to some thinkers - an emphasis on the authority of Islam over them, and not an act of compulsion exercised against them in religion, for this would be what prevents them from actually practicing disbelief practically. This is what made the Quran make a distinction between “Islam” in the sense of submission to the authority of Islamic state practically without necessarily being a believer and “Islam” in the sense of belief and total devotion to Allah from all one’s heart, as well as in his speech and deeds… That is why the hypocrites were still regarded as Muslims, although the Quran clearly mentions that Allah testifies that they are but liars.


http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=12363
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=12362
History of anti-semitism in Iran

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XYlGS3s3zTQC&pg=PA403&lpg=PA403#v=onepage&q&f=false
Extract from page 403-404 of the book "The Jews of Iran in the Nineteenth Century: Aspects of History, Community" edited by David Yeroushalmi. Maltreatment of Jews in Iranian cities. Not allowed to wear socks, not allowed to leave house on rainy days, not allowed to peddle in some quarters of city, not allowed to build their houses higher than Muslims.


http://www.ecoi.net/file_upload/90_1443443478_accord-iran-coi-compilation-september-2015.pdf
Sep 2015: Treatment of religious minorities in Iran


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgppb2Lh4-w
https://www.facebook.com/RabwahTimes/videos/1161373643938820/
Pakistan's leading Shia organizations Majlis Wahdat-e-Muslimeen calls for death of Ahmadiyya Muslims 


https://youtu.be/Nfc5BxY7eKU?t=42m59s
Are Non-Muslims Impure?- Sayed Hossein Al Qazwini: Non-Muslims are najas because it's a tool of putting pressure on non-Muslims to convert. Others say it's a way of Muslims not getting influenced by non-Muslims. From 51:18, says it's not fatwa but perhaps these laws were for those times when Islam was weak. Today non-Muslims can have influence on you through media, internet, newspapers but not handshake.


https://youtu.be/4S2AoT8AKLg?t=57m44s
Sheik Abdul Jalil: To be safe side, stay next to people who share your faith. Because they would question your faith and your may loose your faith. (From 58.02) Enemies of Islam don't come and tell you leave Islam, Islam is bad. No. They make you ask questions about validity of things you believe in and slowly create doubts in your minds.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aimeaCNl-g&feature=youtu.be&t=52m31s
Sayed Hossein Al Qazwini: We have opportunity to expose Sunni refugees in Germany to Shia school before Christian missionaries tempt them and brainwash them to Christianity.


http://www.impact-se.org/reports/iran/
http://www.impact-se.org/wp-content/uploads/Iranian-Education_The-Continuous-Revolution.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264556040_Discrimination_and_Intolerance_in_Iran's_Textbooks
https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-reports/discrimination-and-intolerance-irans-textbooks
Iranian textbooks emphasize martyrdom and apocalypticism but are more subtle in preaching discrimination and hate against religious minorities.

https://twitter.com/SohrabAhmari/status/755740284881952768 
This cartoon about a filthy Jewish blob appears in a 3rd-grade textbook in  


http://newsnoor.com/Content/Content.aspx?PageCode=30780
یزید کی تربیت میں عیسائیوں اور یہودیوں کا ہاتھ
  نیوزنور:ادیان و مذاہب کے ایک  ممتاز محقق کے مطابق؛
 یہی یہودیت اور یہی عیسائیت کہ جو آج کے زمانے میں ہے ،یہی امام حسین علیہ السلام کے دور میں خاندان پرستی کی پہچان کے ساتھ موجود تھی  کہ جنکا ایک کلیدی منصوبہ  یزید کی تربیت کرنا تھا ۔
عالمی اردو خبررساں ادارے نیوزنور کی رپورٹ کے مطابق ، تاریخ اسلام میں خاص کر واقعہء کربلا میں صہیونی عیسائیت  کا کردار انتہائی قابل غور ہے ،اصل میں عیسائی یہودی پادریوں نے حالات ایسے بنائے کہ جن کے نتیجے میں کربلا کا واقعہ رونما ہوا ،سب سے نمایاں شخص کہ جو پادریوں کے بنائے ہوئے منصوبے کے مطابق ،اسلامی اصول میں بنیادی تبدیلیاں کرنا چاہتا تھا وہ یزید تھا ۔حقیقت میں معاویہ کی اجازت سے یزید کی تربیت ،یوحنا ، یا سرجیوش نے کی تھی ، وہ ایک صلیبی صہیونی پادری ،البتہ آج والوں کی زبان میں تھا ،جب اس نے دیکھا کہ شہر کوفہ کے حالات آشفتہ ہیں ،تو سرجیوش نے کہ جو معاویہ کا محرم اسرار تھا ،یزید کے سامنے تجویز رکھی  اور اسطرح  عبید اللہ ابن زیاد کو کوفہ کی فرمانروائی کے لیے منتخب کیا  گیا۔  امام حسین علیہ السلام کے دور میں عیسائیت کی پہچان حاصل کرنے اور عاشوراکے قیام کے سلسلے میں تبشیری عیسائیوں کے کردار کے بارے میں ہم نے ،ادیان و مذاہب کے ماہر تجزیہ نگار حجۃ الاسلام سید محمد رضا طبا طبائی کے ساتھ گفتگو کی کہ جس کی تفصیل ہم ذیل میں نقل کر رہے ہیں ۔
.....
آپ دیکھیں گے کہ مومنوں کے بد ترین دشمن یہودی اور مشرک ہیں ،اور مومنوں کے سب سے قریبی دوست ان لوگوں کو پائیں گے کہ جو یہ کہتے ہیں ،ہم نصاری ہیں ، اس کی وجہ یہ ہے کہ ان کے درمیان کچھ افراد عالم اور تارک الدنیا ہیں اور وہ حق کے مقابلے میں تکبر سے پیش نہیں آتے ۔
ادیان کے ماننے والوں میں یہودی مسلمانوں کے ساتھ گفتگو اور تال میل میں ان کے سب سے بڑے دشمن ہیں ۔
س ۔ اس آیت میں عیسائیوں کو مسلمانوں کا سب سے قریبی دوست بتایا گیا ہے ؟! یعنی دوسرے لفظوں میں مذکورہ آیت کے پیش نظر اسلام کے سب سے قریب دین عیسائیت ہے ؟!
ج ۔ یہ آیت عیسائیت کی ایک دقیق شناخت سے ہمیں آگاہ کرتی ہے اور وہ یہ ہے کہ جب ایک عیسائی گروہ یہودی دوست ہو جاتا ہے تو یہود کی وہی عداوت اور دشمنی جو پوری شدت کے ساتھ وہ مسلمانوں کے ساتھ روا رکھتے ہیں ان کے خون اور افکار میں بھی جاری ہو جاتی ہے ،اور ہر  عیسائی  گروہ کہ جو یہودیت اور ان کی مکاریوں سے فاصلہ اختیار کرتا ہے اسی قدر اس کا تعاون مسلمانوں  کے ساتھ بہتر ہو جاتا ہے ۔
مذکورہ آیت کی بنیاد پر یہودی مسلمانوں کے ساتھ تعامل اور گفتگو میں ادیان کے ماننے والوں میں ان کے بد ترین دشمن ہیں اور عیسائیوں کو ان کا دوست اور ان سے محبت کرنے والا بتایا  گیا ہے ۔
.....
عاشوراء کے واقعے میں یزید کے عیسائی وزیر کے سراغ
کیا یہ کہا جا سکتا ہے کہ اس واقعے میں یزید کے عیسائی وزیر کا ہاتھ تھا ؟
جی ہاں ! ہم اسی بحث کو شروع کرنے والے ہیں ان کا ایک منصوبہ یہ تھا کہ وہ یزید کی تربیت کریں ۔دوسرے لفظوں میں اس کی شخصیت سازی کریں ،سالہا بعد ایک مسیحی مبشر ،ژوزف ولف ،کہ جس کا باپ یہودی تھا ،اور یہ انہی نسل پرست عیسائیوں کی جنس سے تھا ،ایک زمانے وہ صوبہء فارس اور اصفہان میں آیا یہ عیسائی مبشر سال ۱۸۲۴ میں بوشہر میں داخل ہوا،اور اس نے اصفہان ،تبریز ، تہران ، شیراز ، کارون اور کاشان کا سفر کیا اور ان تمام شہروں میں اس نے یہودیوں اور مسلمانوں کے ساتھ ان کو عیسائیت کی جانب کھینچنے کے لیے ملتا تھا یہاں تک کہ نقل کیا جاتا ہے کہ ایک بار اس نے تبریز میں صبح ۱۰ بجے سے ۶ بجے بعد از ظہر تک اس نے چھ زبانوں ،جرمن ،انگریزی ، ایتالیائی ، روسی ، سریانی اور فرانسیسی میں موعظہ کیا ،شاید یہ دعوی مبالغہ ہو ،اس لیے کہ تبریز میں اس قدر لوگ مختلف زبانوں میں اس شخص کی گفتگو سنیں درست معلوم نہیں ہوتا ،لیکن غرض یہ ہے کہ اس قدر عیسائی مبشر جو تعلیم یافتہ تھے ایک مقصد کے تحت آئے تھے ۔
یہ شخص پورے علاقے کو عیسائی بنانے کے لیے ایک منصوبہ پیش کرتا ہے اور وہ تھا ایک علاقائی مبشر کی تربیت ،ایسا مبشر جو پورے ایران پر اثر انداز ہو سکے ،آپ جانتے ہیں کہ اس نے کیا کیا ۔ اس نے اپنے اجداد کی سیرت کو اپنایا ،جس طرح انہوں نے یزید کی تربیت کی تھی اسی طرح ابراہیم شیرازی نام کے ایک شخص کو اپنے ساتھ ملایا اور یہ شخص شاہ کے فرزند کا خصوصی معلم قرار پایا کہ جو بعد میں ایران کا شاہ بننے والا تھا !
میرزا ابراہیم شیرازی (متوفی ۱۸۵۷ م ) ۱۸۴۵ عیسوی میں ریٹائرڈ ہو گیا اور ہالینڈ کی اپنی عیسائی بیوی اور بیٹے ،جان کے ساتھ ایران آیا ،کچھ عرصے تک وہ ،ناسر الدین میرزا ،(ناسر الدین شاہ جانشین محمد شاہ ) یعنی ولی عہد کا گھریلو معلم تھا ،اس کا بیٹا جان بھی سال ۱۸۵۴ میں تہران میں برطانوی سفارت کا منشی دوم تھا غرض یہ کہ ایک ملک کی سب سے بڑی  اور موئثر ترین شخصیت کا برین واش کرنے کے لیے انہوں نے اتنا بڑا منصوبہ بنایا ۔
کیا آج بھی صہیونی عیسائی اسی روش پر عمل کر رہے ہیں ؟
نہیں آج صہیونی عیسائی یہ کام نہیں کرتے ۔ بلکہ وہ اسلامی ملکوں کی نامور شخصیتوں کے فرزندوں کو اسکالر شپ کے بہانے ،اعلی تعلیم کا لالچ دلا کر انہیں برطانیہ امریکہ اور اسرائیل لے جاتے  ہیں ان کو مکمل تعلیم دیتے ہیں اور اپنے ملکوں میں واپس لے جاتے ہیں اور اس کام پر ان کا بہت کم خرچ ہوتا ہے ،خلاصہ یہ کہ عیسائیوں کا چوتھا گروہ حضرت علی علیہ السلام اور امام حسین علیہ السلام کے دور میں جو کام کرتا ہے وہ یزید جیسے شخص کی تربیت ہے ۔
یزید کے ننہیال کا اس کی تربیت میں کردار /یزید کے معلم اس کی ماں کے عیسائی قبیلے سے تھے ۔
جہاں تک مجھے معلوم ہے یزید عیسائی ماں کی اولاد تھا کیا یہ درست ہے ؟
جی ہاں !اس کی ماں ایک عیسائی عورت تھی جس کا نام میسون تھا عیسائی قبیلے سے تھی معاویہ نے یزید کی ماں کو نکال کر اپنے قبیلے میں رکھا تھا ،اس جرم میں کہ اس کے اپنے غلام کے ساتھ ناجائز تعلقات تھے اور یزید بھی میسون کے عیسائی غلام کے ساتھ اس کے ناجائز تعلقات کا نتیجہ تھا ۔
یزید کے ماموں سب کے سب عیسائی تھے میسون قبیلہء بنی کلاب سے تھی بنی کلاب عیسائی تھے میسون بجدل کلبی کی بیٹی تھی بجدل کلبی بھی عیسائی تھا اور اس کا ایک عیسائی غلام تھا کہ جس نے میسون کے ساتھ نا جائز تعلقات قائم کیے یزید کا معلم اور ندیم بھی ایک ادبیات عرب کا ماہر شخص تھا جس کا نام اخطل تھا اخطل عیسائی شاعر تھا اس پر غور کریں ۔ وہ تربیت کہ جس کے پیچھے ان کے اپنے مقاصد تھے وہ دینی نہیں تھی بلکہ وہ ہنر رزم بزم شعر موسیقی اور رقص و سرور  وغیرہ کی تربیت تھی ۔


http://www.jafariapress.com/?p=6217
 ان تمام باتوں کی تصدیق و تائید رسول کریم ﷺ کی اُس حدیث سے بھی ہوتی ہے جو تفسیر صافی ص ۳۸ میں اس آیت کے ذیل میں لکھی گئی ہے ۔ آپ ؐ نے فرمایا: میں تمہیں اِس امت کے یہودیوں کی خبر دوں؟ سب نے عرض کیا ۔ ہاں یا رسول اللہ ﷺ ۔ آپ ؐ نے فرمایا وہ لوگ میری امت میں سے ہی ہوں گے جو میری فضیلت والی طاہر و مطہر اولاد کو قتل کریں گے میری شریعت بدل ڈالیں گے اور میرے بیٹیوں حسن ؑ و حسین ؑ کو شہید کریں گے جس طرح کہ پہلے یہود یوں نے حضرت ذکریا ؑ اور حضرت یحیٰ ؑ کو شہید کیا تھا۔ آگاہ رہو کہ خدا نے ان پر لعنت کی ہے مثل اسلاف یہود کے اللہ تعالیٰ ان کی بقیہ اولاد پر قیامت سے پہلے حسین ؑ مظلوم کی اولاد میں سے ایک ہادی مہدی ؑ مبعوث کریگا جس کے دوستوں کی تلواریں انہیں جہنم میں پہنچا دیں گی۔ (بحار الانوار ج۱۰، ص ۱۹۰)


https://files.majlis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/MUS-BOOK-5.1-StudentEdition.pdf
Graphic illustration of najash of kaafirs mentioned on page 5 but on page 6 says that Jews and Christians are Taahir and should be treated with respect.

http://majlis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/book-5.pdf
Q50:What is the only way to make a kafir tahir?
Ans: The only way a kafir can become tahir is by him or her accepting Islam. With the  acceptance of Islam, the kafir will immediately become tahir

http://majlis.org.uk/book+4++Fiqh+Akhlaq+History.pdf
A Kafir is a person who does not believe in God & Prophet Muhammad and the Day of Judgment - they are NAJIS to the extent that their hair, nails, teeth, bones and sweat are also NAJIS.

https://www.al-islam.org/ritual-and-spiritual-purity-sayyid-muhammad-rizvi/i-najasat-taharat#8-kafirs
From Muslims' perspective, the kuffar are divided into two main groups: kafir dhimmi and kaf'ir harbi. “Kafir dhimmi” is a kafir who lives under the protection of an Islamic government. “Kafir harbi” is a kafir who does not have such a protection. I must also mention a third, but rare, category of kafir: murtad. “Murtad” means an apostate; there are two types of murtad: “Murtad fitri” a person who was born of a Muslim parent, but then declared his disbelief in Islam. “Murtad milli” a non­ Muslim who had accepted the religion of Islam and then apostates from it.
While discussing the ritual purity or impurity of the non-Muslims, the mujtahids divide all the kuffar--dhim­mi, harbi, murtad fitri and milli-into two distinct groups: mushrik and ahlu '1-kitab.
Mushrik (pl. mushrikin) means a polytheist, a person who believes that God has partner(s). It is used for the idol-worshippers also. The followers of Hinduism, of most far eastern religions and of the tribal religions fall in the category of mushrikin. Ahlu ' l-kitab means the people of the Book; it is a name given to those who believe in any of the Books revealed by Allah before the Qur'an. Under Islamic system, the Ahlu '1-kitab have a preferred status in comparison to other non-Muslims. The people who are unanimously counted as Ahlu '1-kitab are: the Jews, the Christians and the Zoroastrians.
As for the mushrikfn, the mujtahids are unanimous that they are najis.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/tehran-teaches-its-children-1468968018 
Our best look so far comes thanks to a new report from Impact-se, a Jerusalem-based institute that monitors the content of textbooks across the Middle East. A ninth-grade social-education textbook reads: “All are submissive and obedient to the Guardian-Jurist,” that is, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Regime leaders are presented as infallible, divinely inspired and beyond criticism.
A third-grade religion textbook’s section on cleanliness includes an illustration of Iranian children chasing away a filthy, mucuslike blob with a Star of David on its back. A fifth-grade text for the 2016-17 academic year shows Palestinian children attacking Israeli soldiers with rocks and slingshots. It’s accompanied by regime founder Ayatollah Khomeini’s portrait and his injunction that “Israel must be wiped out.” America is portrayed as an aggressive hegemon.
As for the types of weapons Iran may use, a 12th-grade religion textbook instructs that “Islamic learning is such that religious experts can extract from it new laws concerning . . . procurement and use of new weapons, in accordance with the new needs of society.”

http://blog.adl.org/international/iran-islamic-revolution-35-years-hate
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/7029.htm
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/196/335.htm
http://www.memri.org/subject_reports/en/196/6/0/0/196.htm
http://www.memri.org/subject_reports/en/196/6/20/0/196.htm
Reports on anti-semitism on Iranian media outfits


http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/03/Iranian-View-of-Israel/387085/
Anti-Israel declarations of Iranian leaders


 http://ijtihadnet.com/wp-content/uploads/Shari-alIslam-fi-masaail-alHalal-wal-Haram.pdf
Extract from Muhaqqiq al-Hilli's book "Sharaa'i` al-Islaam": 
5. The non-Muslims are not allowed to establish a new church, or ring the naqus (semantron), or to build too high buildings. If they violate this condition, they should be censured (ta'zir). If this condition was stipulated in the covenant, the 'ahd will be considered null and void.

 http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=4586 
https://www.al-islam.org/articles/jihad-and-shahadat-ayatullah-sayyid-mahmud-taleqani 
"This portion is in all our books on jurisprudence, and I have extracted it from Al-Mukhtasar al-Nafi' of Allamah Hilli. He lists five conditions of dhimmah (protection):
(1) One has to pay the jizyah. In order for this rights to be protected and in order to be immune from the harm of Muslims, one has to pay a kind of poll-tax to the Muslim bayt al-mal (public treasury).
(2) One must not harm the Muslims, must not have any sexual engagement with Muslim women, must not steal the property of Muslims, and must not cooperate with the enemies of Islam.
(3) One must not be flagrant with prohibited things, such as intoxication, adultery, and incest.
(4) One must not build new churches or temples and must not sound church bells. If they build a new church, it must be destroyed .
(5) One must not build a building taller than the buildings of the Muslims. This would be disgraceful to the Muslims.
Who owns the fifteen story building at the corner of Lalehzar and Islambul? Who are the ones in this country cooperating with the enemies of Muslims? This is the law of Islam. This is the jurisprudence of Islam. I demand a confession from you yourselves. Who are the ones who steal the property of Muslims and help the Israelis and international Zionists? Who are the ones who take Muslim women out of the boundaries of chastity? Are they protected minorities? Or hostile ones?"


https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/04/22/iran-executed-my-grandfather-now-the-regime-is-trying-to-hide-the-way-it-has-treated-other-jews/  
In the 16th century, conservative Shiite scholars and clergy under the Safavid dynasty had restrictions placed on all minorities, including Jews, to bar them from economic activity and to prevent them from passing their “ritual impurity” to Muslims: Don’t open shops in the bazaar, don’t build attractive residences, don’t buy homes from Muslims, don’t give your children Muslim names, don’t use Muslim public baths, don’t leave your house when it rains or snows, don’t touch anything when entering Muslim shops. 
....... 
In 1962, when my family  built the country’s first private sector high-rise, the 17-story Plasco Building in Tehran, Shiite cleric Mahmoud Taleghani objected to the idea that a Jew had built the tallest building of its time in Iran. .....
On May 9, 1979, my grandfather was executed after a 20-minute trial on trumped-up charges that included being a “Zionist spy.” The Revolutionary Court did not allow my grandfather to have a lawyer. After a firing squad killed him, the new regime stole what he had spent his lifetime building.


http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/238471/why-some-iranian-jews-stay 
Since 1979, the numbers of the Jewish population are down by more than 90 percent, and fear is a familiar companion for those who remain, whether because they are too old to leave or because they remain attached to the country of their birth.
The execution of Habib Elghanian, the head of the Jewish community, a businessman, and a philanthropist, was the first powerful blow that befell the Jewish community and sent an intimidating massage from the Islamic Republic. This action appeared to be taken mainly for the purpose of imposing fear. The charges against him included “friendship with the enemies of God” and being a “Zionist spy.” His granddaughter, Shahrzad Elghanayan, said that “after a 20-minute trial on trumped-up charges” he was executed. In the span of less than an hour, an influential voice was silenced. That message, that terror, rippled through the community.
In the current climate of the Iranian government’s antagonism toward Israel, the remaining Jewish population of Iran, which numbers perhaps 9,000, is caught in complex circumstances. Iran’s Jewish community has to be extremely cautious of showing any sympathy toward Israel. If they exhibit any sign of this, they risk serious criminal charges, such as being labeled an Israeli spy. Consequences of these charges range from torture to death.
Each word spoken, each action taken, and all movement throughout the community is calculated and evaluated carefully to prevent these consequences. Still, this is not enough. The government authorities intervene in the few Jewish schools that remain. Jews are not allowed to become school principals. The curriculum has changed, and activities are monitored to make sure, for example, that the main language is Persian and not Hebrew. Distribution of Hebrew texts or the teaching of Judaism is risky and strongly discouraged.
Even within school walls, the Jewish community cannot expect any form of safety or freedom. Current restrictions and discriminatory policies against Jews include bans against Jewish people in key governmental and significant decision-making positions: A Jewish person can’t be a member of the influential Guardian Council, a commander in the army, or serve as the president of the nation, among other restrictions. Jews are not permitted to become a judge at any level or assist in the judicial or legislative systems. Furthermore, Jews are banned from becoming members of parliament (the Consultative Assembly) through general elections.
Jews are not allowed to inherit from Muslims. But, if one member of a Jewish family converts to Islam, he would inherit everything. This law seems to be designed to promote conversion to Islam by providing financial incentives.


http://www.momentmag.com/how-jew-friendly-persia-became-anti-semitic-iran/ 
"The Pact of Umar, named after the reigning leader from 634 to 644 C.E., established harsher laws for non-Muslims. Jews were barred from government office and the military, and forbidden to ride on white donkeys, which were seen as symbols of cleanliness. They were forced to wear yellow armbands, while Christians had to don blue ones.
After the Mongols invaded Persia in the second half of the 13th century, the standing of the country’s Jews improved dramatically. “This period was the highlight of the life of Jews in Islamic Iran,” says Pirnazar. “The Mongol rulers at the time were secular, not yet converted to Islam, so Jews had a chance to penetrate into socio-political and cultural levels.”
This didn’t last. Treatment of minorities deteriorated after the Safavids took power in the 1500s, imposing their hard-line brand of Shia Islam and ushering in “the worst era of Persian-Jewish relations,” says political scientist Eliz Sanasarian of the University of Southern California, author of Religious Minorities in Iran.
The Safavids forcibly converted Iran’s Sunni Muslims to Shia Islam and introduced the concept of “ritual pollution,” which further segregated minorities from their neighbors. Because nonbelievers were deemed spiritually and physically contagious, Jews were barred from leaving their houses when it rained, for fear the water would transmit their impurities. A Jew who entered a Muslim home had to sit on a special rug and could not be offered tea, food or a water pipe, since any object touched by a Jew could no longer be used by a Muslim.
Safavid rule came to an end in 1736, but the Muslim perception of Jews as impure remained. Occasional violent outbreaks, reminiscent of the blood libels and pogroms carried out in Europe, punctuated the next two centuries of Qajar Dynasty rule. In one incident in the northeastern town of Mashhad in 1839, an ailing Jewish woman was told to use dogs’ blood to cure a certain malady. A rumor quickly spread that she had tried the cure on a Shia holiday, deliberately insulting the sect. Jews were attacked and some three dozen killed, while the rest of the Jewish community was given the choice of conversion to Islam or death. Such bloody outbreaks persisted until the 20th century, when a new breed of shah came to power."

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fFaw4od7nfUC&pg=PA219&lpg=PA219#v=onepage&q&f=false
Extract from page 219 of the book "Persia in Crisis: Safavid Decline and the Fall of Isfahan" By Rudi Matthee



https://islamicvirtues.com/2013/12/25/killing-non-muslims-and-slaves/
Allamah Hilli (Hasan ibn Yusuf ibn `Ali ibn Mutahhar Hilli) wrote a famous text criticizing the beliefs of the Ahlus Sunnah called Nahj al-Haq wa Kashf as-Sidq. In it we read the following:
ذهبت الإمامية إلى أنه لا يقتل المسلم بالذمي .
و قال أبو حنيفة يقتل .
و قد خالف قوله تعالى وَ لَنْ يَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ لِلْكافِرِينَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ سَبِيلًا * لا يَسْتَوِي أَصْحابُ النَّارِ وَ أَصْحابُ الْجَنَّةِ
و قال (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) لا يقتل مؤمن بكافر و لا ذو عهدة في عهدة
…
ذهبت الإمامية إلى أن الحر لا يقتل بالعبد .
و قال أبو حنيفة يقتل بعبد غيره .
و قد خالف قوله تعالى الْحُرُّ بِالْحُرِّ وَ الْعَبْدُ بِالْعَبْدِ
و قوله (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) لا يقتل حر بعبد
و قوله (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) من السنة أن لا يقتل الحر بعبد
ذهبت الإمامية إلى أن الأب لا يقتل بالولد .

http://www.al-shia.org/html/ara/books/lib-aqaed/nahj-haq/n25.htm
Translation: And the Imamiyyah (Twelver Shi’ites) believe that a Muslim is not killed for killing a dhimmi.
(But) Abu Haneefa said he is to be killed. And this is in opposition to the words of Allaah, the Most High, “And never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way (to triumph) over the believers.” [Qur’an, surah 4, verse 141]. And “Not equal are the Companions of the Fire and the Companions of the Garden: it is the Companions of the Garden, that will achieve Felicity.” [Qur’an, surah 59, verse 20].
And the Prophet, may the Blessings and Peace of Allaah be upon him, said: “Do not kill a Muslim for (killing) a kafir, nor a person who has a treaty during the time of the treaty”.
…
The Imamiyyah believe that the free man is not killed for killing a slave.
(But) Abu Haneefa said that the free man is to be killed for a slave that he doesn’t own.
But this is in opposition to the saying of Allaah, the Most High, “Free man for the free man, and the slave for the slave.” [Qur’an: Surah 2, Verse 178]
And the saying of the Prophet, may the Blessings and Peace of Allaah be upon him, “From my Sunnah is that the free man is not killed for killing a slave”.
The Imamiyyah believe that the father is not killed for killing his child. [end of translation]


Allamah Hilli also provides the statements of Shaykh Mufeed and Shaykh Tusi (two of the most important Shi’ite scholars) on this issue in his Mukhtalaf ash-Shi’ah:
قال المفيد: السيد إذا قتل عبده عمدا كان عليه كفارة صنيعه عتق رقبة مؤمنة، وإن أضاف إليه صيام شهرين متتابعين واطعام ستين مسكينا، فهو أفضل وأحوط له في كفارة ذنبه (2). وهذا يشعر باكتفاء العتق. والشيخ – رحمه الله – قال في النهاية: ومن قتل عبده متعمدا كان عليه كفارة قتل العمد (3). وعليه المشهور، وهو الاقوى، لدلالة الروايات عليه. روى أبو بصير في الصحيح، عن الصادق – عليه السلام – قال: من قتل عبده متعمدا فعليه أن يعتق رقبة وأن يطعم ستين مسكينا ويصوم شهرين (4). وفي الصحيح عن زرارة، عن الصادق – عليه السلام – في الرجل يقتل عبده متعمدا أي شئ عليه من الكفارة؟ قال: عتق رقبة وصيام شهرين وصدقة على ستين مسكينا

http://www.yasoob.com/books/htm1/m001/00/no0077.html
[Translation] Shaykh Mufeed said: If the master kills his slave deliberately, the kaffarah (compensation) that is due him is the act of freeing a believing slave [non-believer slaves should not be freed]. But if he adds to it fasting for two consecutive months and feeds sixty poor persons, this is better and protects him in the compensation for his sin. And this can be done to satisfy the requirement of freeing a slave (if the person doesn’t have any more slaves).
And the Shaykh (Tusi) – May Allah have mercy on him – said in his book al-Nihaya: “Whoever kills his slave deliberately, on him is the compensation of killing deliberately. And these are well known. And this is the strongest position, and the proofs for it are the narrations about it. Abu Baseer narrates in an authentic narration from (Ja’far) al-Sadiq – peace be upon him – who said: Whoever kills his slave deliberately, on him is the freeing of a slave, or feeding sixty poor persons, or fasting two months.” And in the authentic narration from Zurarah from (Ja’far) al-Sadiq – peace be upon him – who was asked about a man who killed his slave deliberately, is there any kaffarah (compensation) upon him? He (al-Sadiq) replied: (The kaffarah is) freeing of a slave and fasting for two months and giving charity to sixty poor persons.” [end of translation]


https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=9_oWt9g3D30C&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126#v=onepage&q&f=false 
Extract from page 126 of the book "Law: Selected Entries from Encyclopaedia of the World of Islam" edited by Gholamali Haddad Adel, Mohammad Jafar Elmi, Hassan Taromi-Rad:



http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235013114-najasat/ 
Shayk Tusi
Translation ( from brother macisaac):
Anyone that confesses upon themselves as being slaves, and they are baligh, or the evidence of their being slaves is established, even if they are not baligh, it is permissible to possess them, and to take part in buying (them), selling, gifting and what resembles it.
And everyone who opposes Islam from the generally known types of kuffar, it is correct to enslave them. Then, they are divided into two divisions: the division from them from whom the jizya is accepted, and they stay upon their religion and its rules and are pardoned from enslavement. And they are the People of the Book: the Jews and the Christians.
And the Zoroastrians, their ruling is the ruling of the People of the Book.
So if they withhold from accepting the jizya, they are killed, and their progeny is captured and enslaved.
And whoever is apart from the People of the Book nothing is accepted from them but Islam.
So if they refrain, their ruling in it is death and the enslavement of their progeny.
And there is no harm in enslavement all of the types of kuffar, even if the people of corruption and misguidance capture them

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FO6CBMZU5xgC&pg=PA145&#v=onepage&q&f=false
Extract from pages 145 of the book "Concise Description of Islamic Law and Legal Opinions" by Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan Ṭūsī, a Shia jurist. Non-Ahle kitab non-Muslims have to accept Islam or be fought against.



https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FO6CBMZU5xgC&pg=PA216&#v=onepage&q&f=false
Extract from pages 216 of the book "Concise Description of Islamic Law and Legal Opinions" by Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan Ṭūsī, a Shia jurist. Non-Ahle kitab non-Muslims have to accept Islam or be fought against.



http://ijtihadnet.com/wp-content/uploads/Shari-alIslam-fi-masaail-alHalal-wal-Haram.pdf 
http://www.imamaliseminary.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Shari-alIslam-fi-masaail-alHalal-wal-Haram.pdf 
Extract from Muhaqqiq al-Hilli's book "Sharaa'i` al-Islaam": "Jizyah (land-tax) should be taken from all those who confess to their religion, who include the Jews, Christians and those who are doubted to have a scripture (a Book), who are the Magians (Magus). No religion is accepted from other peoples except the Islam."


http://www.al-islam.org/jihad-holy-war-islam-and-its-legitimacy-quran-ayatullah-murtadha-mutahhari/lecture-one-questions#c-jiziyah
Nowhere in the Qur’an are we told to fight the mushrikin until they pay the jiziyah, and to fight them no more once they have paid it. Concerning the People of the Book, however, we are told that once they are willing to pay the jiziyah, we are to fight them no longer. This is a clearly marked difference.


http://www.al-islam.org/jihad-holy-war-islam-and-its-legitimacy-quran-ayatullah-murtadha-mutahhari/lecture-two-defence-or
"I said that some of the Qur’anic instructions about jihad against kuffar (disbelievers) are unconditional, which means they state only this: “O Prophet Fight with the Kuffar and the hypocrites.” Or, in the case the verse pertaining to which we recited, after a period which is given to the polytheists (four months), if they have not adopted Islam or haven't migrated, then they are to be killed. (Note: Whether this migration means to the surroundings of Mecca and around, or elsewhere, is a question to be discussed late.)"

http://www.al-islam.org/180-questions-about-islam-vol-1-practical-laws-makarim-shirazi/jihad
"Islam...grants the communities, which possess divine books, sufficient opportunity so that, after study and reflection, they may accept the religion of Islam. But if they do not do so it looks upon them as a confederate and by placing some specific conditions, which are neither intricate nor difficult, endeavours to have a peaceful co-existence with them.
However, the issue of polytheism is different since it is neither a religion nor a doctrine and so it cannot be looked upon with respect and esteem - rather, it is a kind of superstition, deviation and foolishness. In reality, it is a kind of mental and moral sickness, which ought to be uprooted.
The use of the terms 'freedom' and 'respect', in connection with the views of others, is applicable if the views or the beliefs are at least based upon a foundation. However, deviation, superstition and sickness are not something that can be treated as respectable, and it is due to this that Islam has ordered idolatry to be uprooted from the human society, even at the cost of warfare; if idol temples and their evil influences cannot be brought down and destroyed by peaceful means, then they should be uprooted by means of force."

http://www.al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-2-ayatullah-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/twenty-eighth-greater-sin#it-necessary-migrate-towards-jurist
"According to Sharhe Lumah and Jameal Maqasid, the first Martyr6 is believed to have said: “It is incumbent for a Muslim to migrate if he is living in the midst of infidels and is unable to follow Islam or perform his religious duties. In the same way a Shia who is living among the Ahl ul-Sunnat and is not able to perform the ritual acts of Shias is similarly required to migrate to areas populated with Shia people.” However this view which is attributed to Muhammad Ibn Makki is not compatible with the general Islamic principle. Because if a Shia is living among Sunnis he does not need to forgo his religious obligations. He can follow Taqiyya (dissimulation) and fulfill his ritual acts. He can perform the Islamic acts in the same manner as the Sunnis if he fears for his life or property. We do not have any tradition exhorting such people to migrate to another area. On the other hand the Holy Imams (a.s.) have time and again emphasised upon the adherence to dissimulation under such circumstances."


http://www.al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-ayatullah-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fifth-greater-sin-murder#permanent-chastisement-exclusively-unbelievers
One of the beliefs of the Shia Ithna Ashari school of thought is that eternal punishment is only for the Kuffar (Unbelievers). In other words, if a person dies in belief, he will not remain under punishment forever, even if he has killed a believer (or someone else whose killing has been prohibited according to the Divine command), or even though he has committed other greater sins.

http://ur.abna24.com/cultural/zionism/archive/2009/06/16/120750/story.html
Quran says Jews are cursed because of their greed and materialism, and Muslims should avoid socializing and friendship with Jews.

http://ur.abna24.com/cultural/zionism/archive/2014/04/13/602161/story.html
Jews worst enemies of Muslims. یہودیوں کے باطل عقائد اور غیر یہودیوں پر ان کے جرائم

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bux9eYOXohQC&pg=PT18&lpg=PT18#v=onepage&q&f=false
Extract from the page 18 of the book "A History of Modern Iran" By Ervand Abrahamian:




https://hubeali.com/books/Urdu-Books/TehzeebulIslam.pdf
Tehzeeb-Ul-Islam, page 411-2.




http://web.archive.org/web/20140916015558/http://en.iranwire.com/blogs/6300/5317/
https://en.iranwire.com/blogs/6300/5317/
March 3, 2014: “Some have come forward with a plan for citizenship rights and want to give equal rights to the Baha’is and the Jews and the Muslims and…We can never accept this.”
......
Ayatollah Yazdi says that religious inequality is acceptable. “Islam never considers a Jew and a Muslim as equals,” he said. “Even though Islam has conferred certain rights to Jews, this does not mean that they are equals in every right. Sometimes this is called ‘second-class citizenship’. They can call it whatever they want, but it does not change the reality.”



https://iwpr.net/global-voices/zoroastrians-face-uncertain-future-iran
June 30, 2010: By law, Zoroastrians are not allowed to open new fire temples or other religious buildings.
Until this year, the Zoroastrian association in the capital Tehran was allowed to use the school premises it owns for religious ceremonies outside working hours, but this has now been banned....Until the Qajar era of the 19th century, Zoroastrians were subject to harsh restrictions which forbade them from doing business, travelling freely, and even coming out on rainy days.
In his memoir of a childhood in Iran, Ardeshir Khaze, who died in Mumbai in 1987, wrote that Muslims considered Zoroastrians like him untouchable.
“We were not even allowed to walk through their fields because [they thought] we would defile their crop,” he wrote. “One day, when I was six, I secretly went through a Muslim field to get home quicker because it was a long way from our shop to our home. But they spotted me and gave me a flogging. My screams fell on deaf ears.”


https://www.memri.org/tv/former-iraqi-mp-ayad-jamal-al-din-civil-state-only-solution-combat-isis
https://www.memri.org/tv/former-iraqi-mp-ayad-jamal-al-din-civil-state-only-solution-combat-isis/transcript
October 17, 2014:
Ayad Jamal Al-Din: Both the Shiite and Sunni fiqh say that the Yazidis should be killed.  ..... The Christians and the Jews are considered the People of the Book, and some include the Zoroastrians and the Sabeans, but as for the Buddhists, they should all be killed. This is according to both Shiite and Sunni fiqh.

https://twitter.com/RZimmt/status/538426497111834624
Nov 28, 2014: Hardline cleric, Mehdi Taeb: Only way for emergence of the Mahdi is removal of from the map.


http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/234999884-destroy-all-churches-in-the-arabian-peninsula/
http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/234999884-destroy-all-churches-in-the-arabian-peninsula/?do=findComment&comment=2362941
لْحُسَيْنُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ عَنْ صَفْوَانَ بْنِ يَحْيَى عَنِ الْعِيصِ بْنِ الْقَاسِمِ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع عَنِ الْبِيَعِ وَ الْكَنَائِسِ يُصَلَّى فِيهِمَا فَقَالَ نَعَمْ وَ سَأَلْتُهُ هَلْ يَصْلُحُ نَقْضُهَا مَسْجِداً فَقَالَ نَعَمْ
From al-`Īṣ bin al-Qāsim said, I asked Abā `Abd Allāh about Churches and Synagogues, can I pray in them? He (عليه السلام) said: ‘Yes’, and I asked him (عليه السلام) about if it is correct to demolish them (to build) a masjid? And he (عليه السلام) said: ‘Yes’
Source:
al-Toosi, Tahdheeb al-Ahkaam, vol. 2, ch. 11, pg. 222, hadeeth # 82
Grading:
al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is SaHeeH
--> Milaadh al-Akhyaar, vo. 4, pg. 221
مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ عَنِ الْفَضْلِ بْنِ شَاذَانَ عَنْ صَفْوَانَ عَنِ الْعِيصِ بْنِ الْقَاسِمِ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع عَنِ الْبِيَعِ وَ الْكَنَائِسِ هَلْ يَصْلُحُ نَقْضُهَا لِبِنَاءِ الْمَسَاجِدِ فَقَالَ نَعَمْ
From al-`Īṣ bin al-Qāsim said, I asked Abā `Abd Allāh (عليه السلام) about Churches and Synagogues, is it correct to demolish them to build masājid? And he (عليه السلام) said: ‘Yes’
Source:
al-Kulayni, al-Kaafi, vol. 3, pg. 368, hadeeth # 3
Grading:
al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Majhool Kal-SaHeeH (Unknown like a SaHeeH)**
--> Mir'aat al-`Uqool, vol. 15, pg. 245
** Majlisi does this grading because of Muhammad bin Ismaa`eel, who is in actuality majhool (unknown), but since this hadeeth has a shawaahid (supporting evidence), this would be counted as authentic as well, as many scholars have considered this hadeeth SaHeeH
Here is what Al-Toosi has said concerning Synagogues and Churches:
و لا بأس بنقض البيع و الكنائس و استعمال آلتهما في المساجد. و لا بأس أيضا أن تبنيا مساجد
“And there is no problem to demolish synagogues and churches and use their tools for the masaajid. And there is no problem to build them into masājid also.”
Source:
Al-Toosi, al-Nihāyah fī Mujarrad al-Fiqh wa al-Fatāwa, Kitāb al-Salāh, Ch. 12, pg. 109
Here is what Al-Toosi has said again concerning Synagoges and churches.
و يجوز نقض البيع و الكنائس و استعمال آلتها في المساجد إذا اندرس أهلها أو كانت في دار حرب
فأما إذا كان لها أهل من الذمة يؤدون الجزية و يقومون بشرائط الذمة و لا يجوز ذلك،.
And it is permissible to demolish synagogues and churches and use their tools for a masājid, if their people have been wiped out, or if it were in the land of war (dār al-Ḥarb)
And as for if it’s of the people of al-Dhimmah who pay the jizyah, who fulfill the conditions of a dhimmi, it is no permissible for that.
Source:
Al-Toosi, Al-MabsooT fee fiqh Al-Imaamiyyah, pg. 160
Here is what Muhaqqiq al-Hilli has said:
لا يجوز استئناف البيع و الكنائس في بلاد الإسلام و لو استجدت وجب إزالتها سواء كان ذلك البلد مما استحدثه المسلمون أو فتح عنوة أو صلحا على أن تكون الأرض للمسلمين
و لا بأس بما كان قبل الفتح و بما استجدوه في أرض فتحت صلحا على أن تكون الأرض لهم
و إذا انهدمت كنيسة مما لهم استدامتها جاز إعادتها و قيل لا إذا كانت في أرض المسلمين و أما إذا كانت في أرضهم فلا بأس
It is not permissible to renew Synagogues and Churches in the countries of Islam, and if they be renewed, it is wājib to obliterate it be it that country which is newly (established) by the Muslims or conquered by force or treaty, upon it being the land of the Muslims
And there is no problem if it is done before conquering and establishing it in a land which is conquered by a treaty upon when it belongs to or is owned by them.
And if a church is destroyed, which it is continue, it is permissible for it to be rebuilt, and some say: ‘No (it is not permissible to rebuild it) if it is in the land of the Muslims, and As for when it is in their land, and there is no problem (to rebuild it)’
Source:
Muhaqqiq Al-Hillee (d. 676 AH), Sharaa-' Al-Islaam fee Masaa-il Al-Halaal wa Al-Haraam, vol. 1, pg. 302
Here is what `Allaamah al-Hilli says:
و لا يجوز استئناف البيع و الكنائس في بلاد الإسلام، و تزال لو استحدثت و لا بأس بما كان عاديا قبل الفتح، و بما أحدثوه في أرض الصلح، و يجوز رمتها.
And it is not permissible to renew Synagogues and Churches in the countries of Islam, and destroy if it is renewed, and there is no problem if it is done before conquest, and if it is a newly (established) land of a treaty, it is permissible to destroy it
Source:
al-Hilli, Mukhtasar al-Nāfī, vol. 1, pg. 111
Regarding non-Muslims living in the Arabian peninsula, there have been Shee`ah scholars who have said this as well. The mashhoor (famous) opinion is Non-Muslims cannot live in Mekkah and Madeenah.
و أما المساجد
فلا يجوز أن يدخلوا المسجد الحرام إجماعا و لا غيره من المساجد عندنا و لو أذن لهم لم يصح الإذن لا استيطانا و لا اجتيازا و لا امتيارا.
و لا يجوز لهم استيطان الحجاز على قول مشهور و قيل المراد به مكة و المدينة و في الاجتياز به و الامتيار منه تردد و من أجازه حده بثلاثة أيام و لا جزيرة العرب و قيل المراد بها مكة و المدينة و اليمن و مخاليفها و قيل هي من عدن إلى ريف عبادان طولا و من تهامة و ما والاها إلى أطراف الشام عرضا
As for the Masājid:
It is an ijmā` (unanimously agreed upon) that it is not permissible for them (ahl al-dhimmah) to enter Masjid al-Harām, not (enter) from the other masājid (pl. of masjid) of ours, and if they are given permissible (to enter), it is not a valid (correct) permission, they cannot settle, pass by, and they cannot eat (or bring food into the masjid).
And it is not permissible for them to reside in al-Hijāz according to the mashhoor (famous) opinion, and some say that what is meant by it is just Makkah and al-Madīnah. And about passing by and eating from it there is a disagreement. And whoever permits it will receive punishment for three days. And they cannot (reside in) the Arabian Peninsula, and some say what is meant by it is Makkah, al-Madīnah, Yemen and mukhaalifihā (its districts?). And some say it is from `Adn (Yemen area) to the countryside of `Abadān lengthwise, and from Tahāmah** and what comes to the tip of Shām widthwise.
Source:
  • al-Muhaqqiq al-Hilli, Sharaa'i` al-Islaam, vol. 1, Kitaab al-Jihaad, Third Section, Fourth Chapter, pg. 303
** Narrow coastal region of Arabia on the Red Sea

http://en.abna24.com/cultural/archive/2010/11/14/213082/story.html
(Reference:Tuhaf al-Uqool) Description of Swords by Imam Baqir(A.S.)
The three unsheathed swords are as follows:
One is unsheathed against the Arab polytheists. ... These people are either killed or convert to Islam. Their fortunes are regarded as spoils. Their progenies are captives according to the practices of the Prophet(S.A.W.)....
Nothing will be accepted from the Dhimmis, who are enjoying the protection of the Islamic state, except the tribute otherwise, they are killed, their fortunes taken as spoils, and their progenies as captives. ..
The third sword is against the non-Arab polytheists, like the Turks,Daylam, and Khazar. In the beginning of the sura in which He mentions the affairs of the atheists, Allah says: If you encounter the disbelievers in a battle, strike-off their heads. Take them as captives when they are defeated. Then you may set them free - after capture - as a favor to them, with or without a ransom-between the Muslims and them-, when the battle is over (Holy Qur'an 47:4) Nothing will be accepted from these people except being killed or converting to Islam. It is unlawful for us to marry from them as long as they are in state of war against us.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5222/iran-jews
"For centuries, there were forced conversions, the closing of synagogues, and destruction of Hebrew books[6] Outward signs distinguished Jews from the rest of Iran's "loyal" citizens. Throughout the Safavid Era, Iran's Jews were forced to wear colored hats and non-matching shoes.[7] In 1588, under the Safavid Shah Abbas I, restrictive ordinances against Jews were instituted, which came to known as "Jam Abbasi Laws," severely limiting Jewish property rights and professions in which Jews could work.[8] Sometimes anti-Jewish feelings resulted in the often deadly Yud Bazi (Jew Game)[9] or Yud Khost (Jew Murder).[10] Attacks occurred: Muslim Imams whipped up their followers in anti-Jewish diatribes."

"Jews of Shiite Iran suffered far more than the Jews of the Sunni world, where the Ottoman Empire welcomed Jewish refugees from Spain, who had fled the Inquisition. In contrast, at this time the Shiite clergy of Iran developed the idea that Jews were a source of ritual impurity. Thus if a Jew touched a piece of fruit in the market in Tehran, it could no longer be eaten by a Shiite.
Shah Abbas (1571-1629) demanded that Hebrew books be burned; at one point he decreed that Jews convert to Islam or be put to death. He pulled back from this edict, but the idea survived in Persia. In 1839, the Jews of Mashhad were given the choice of conversion to Islam or death, and many outwardly became Muslims, while preserving their Judaism privately.

What about today? With the rise of Ayatollah Khomeini, anti-Jewish attitudes became prominent in Iran again. In his book "Islamic Government," Khomeini wrote: "We must protest and make the people aware that the Jews and their foreign backers are opposed to the very foundations of Islam and wish to establish Jewish domination throughout the world." Given his view of the Jewish people, it was not surprising that in 1979 he labeled Israel as a "cancerous growth in the Middle East," adding that "every Muslim has a duty to prepare himself for battle against Israel."

This language about Israel as a "tumor" or as a source of infection has been used by Ayatollah Khamenei and others today. Radical Iranian clerics who provide the religious indoctrination of the Revolutionary Guard, like Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, say that the Jews are the source of global corruption. Ayatollah Nur-Hamedani, another lecturer to the Revolutionary Guard, has said that the Jews must be vanquished to prepare for the arrival of the Hidden Imam.
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/the-classic-blood-libel-against-jews-goes-mainstream-in-iran
"Although anti-Judaism is well known in Iranian Islamic tradition and literature (even in the works of well-known classical poets such as Saadi), this is fundamentally different from modern anti-Semitism, which was imported into Iran by leftist and Islamist intellectuals and political activists before and after the 1979 revolution. Secular intellectuals were heavily influenced by anti-Semitic trends in Europe and the Soviet Union, while Islamists were influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Arab anti-Semitic writers. In addition, some Iraqi Shiite clerics transmitted anti-Semitic literature from the Arab world to Iran. For instance, Sayyed Muhammad Shirazi -- head of the Shirazi family, who are known for their ultraconservative tendencies and run dozens of satellite television networks, websites, organizations, and mosques in the United States, Europe, and the Middle East -- published several anti-Semitic books in the 1960s. One of these, titled The World As Jews' Plaything, was translated by Sayyed Hadi al-Modarresi, an Iraqi cleric who is now a Shiite religious authority (marja)."


https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=M3ZJMYiNe0UC&pg=PA338&lpg=PA338#v=onepage&q&f=false
Jamsheed Choksy's article "Antisemitism' Permutations in Iran" in the book "Resurgent Antisemitism: Global Perspectives" edited by Alvin H. Rosenfeld

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=c0S4lOyfKSYC&pg=PA33&lpg=PA33#v=onepage&q&f=false
Extract from the page 33 of the book "Jews of Islam" by Bernard Lewis:
"Shi'ite Muslims are further concerned with the question of ritual purity. Purity (tahara) and impurity (najasa) are matters of great importance for practicing Muslims. Defilement, according to Muslim jurists, produces a state of ritual impurity and may result from sexual intercourse, menstruation, and childbirth; from micturition and defecation; or from contact with unclean things or creatures such as wine, pigs, carrion, and certain discharges from the body. Among the strict Shi'a, non-Muslims also fall into this category, and contact with them, or with clothes, food, or utensils handled by them, causes ritual impurity requiring purification before undertaking religious or ritual duties. Some authorities in Iran were even stricter on the question of ritual purity. Thus the first of a set of rules dating from late nineteenth-century Iran forbids Jews to go out of doors when it rains or snows, presumably for fear lest the rain or snow carry the impurity of the Jews to the Muslims. Such obsessive concern with the dangers of pollution by unclean persons of another group is virtually limited to Iranian Shi'ism and may be influenced by Zoroastrian practices. It is unknown to mainstream Sunni Islam."

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=c0S4lOyfKSYC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40#v=onepage&q&f=false
Extract from the page 40 of the book "Jews of Islam" by Bernard Lewis: 
"Shi'ites in Iran were far less tolerant than their Sunni contemporaries in the Ottoman Empire. Expulsion, forced conversion, and massacre—all three of rare occurrence in the Sunni lands—were features of life in Iran up to the nineteenth century. Western travelers comment frequently on the abject and miserable status of the non-Muslim subjects of the shahs. In general, it is significant that, with the striking exception of Spain and Arabia, Islamic regimes were more tolerant at the center than at the periphery, indeed becoming more repressive the further they were from the heartlands of Islamic civilization. Life for non-Muslims was usually better in Egypt or Turkey, Syria or Iraq than in North Africa and Central Asia."


http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/the-roots-of-iranian-antisemitism-and-its-current-consequences
"It is true that Jews and Non-Jews share a history that goes back some 2,700 years in Iran. This does not mean, however, that Jews have enjoyed equality under the Shiite rule that began in 1501.
On the contrary, in no other Islamic land were Jews so poorly treated and so brutally persecuted as in Persia. In 1830, 400 Jews in Tabriz had their throats slashed. In 1839, all the Jews in Mashhad were forced to convert to Islam. In 1910, following rumors of a ritual murder, 6,000 Jews in Shiraz were robbed of all their possessions: twelve were killed and another 50 wounded.[9] “I do not know any more miserable, helpless, and pitiful individual on God’s earth than the Jahudi in those countries,” the Orientalist and voyager Arminius Vambery wrote in 1905 following his return from Persia: “The poor Jew is despised, belabored and tortured … he is the poorest of the poor.”[10]
This inhuman treatment has to do with a particularity of the Shiite image of the Jew that has no counterpart in Sunni Islam. Only the Shiite established a system of “ritual purity,” which bears similarities to the attitude of Hindus toward the Pariahs or “untouchables.” According to it, whoever is not Muslim is najas or “impure.” All contact with an unbeliever is considered a sort of poisoning.
The paranoid fear of “infection” provoked periodic excesses and led to the development of a particular Shiite code of conduct, which especially affected Jews, since unlike the Armenian Christians and the small Zoroastrian community, the Jewish minority was present throughout the country. Its members had to live in ghettoes and were not permitted to go out when it rained or snowed, in order to prevent their “impurity” from spreading and coming into contact with Muslims. For the same reason, they were prohibited from visiting public baths or having any contact with the food and drinks of Muslims.[11]
Officially, these rules were abolished when the Shah-Pahlavis came to power. But the orthodox clergy continued to insist on them."


https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ju8xJ5JBXgsC&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32#v=onepage&q&f=false 
Extract from the page 32 of the book "The Legacy of Jihad" edited by Andrew G. Bostom.


http://www.andrewbostom.org/2009/12/is-shiism-the-iranian-regimes-achilles-heel/ 
The great Orientalist Ignaz Goldziher—a renowned Islamophile—believed that Shi’ism manifested greater doctrinal intolerance toward non-Muslims, compared to Sunni Islam. Goldziher observed,
 On examining the legal documents, we find that the Shi’i legal position toward other faiths is much harsher and stiffer than that taken by Sunni Muslims. Their law reveals a heightened intolerance to people of other beliefs…Of the severe rule in the Qur’an (9:28) that “unbelievers are unclean”, Sunni Islam has accepted an interpretation that is as good as a repeal. Shi’i law, on the other hand, has maintained the literal sense of the rule; it declares the bodily substance of the unbeliever to be ritually unclean, and lists the touching of an unbeliever among the ten things that produce najasa [najis], ritual impurity.

 
http://m-hosseini.ir/safavid/articles-1/48.pdf 
Shah Tahmasp is said to have characterized his campaigns in Georgia as jiha¯d, or ‘holy war’ against the infidel, and the Shah himself is described as padisha-i mujahid-i ghazi, ‘the king who is a holy warrior and fighter for the faith’.... the author of the Tarikh-i Alam-ara yi Abbasi, Iskandar Beg Monshi, when describing these campaigns, uses terminology which belongs purely to the realm of Muslim polemic. The term jiha¯d occurs repeatedly; the Safavid forces are called mujahidan-i sipah-islam (‘holy warriors of the army of Islam’), who are engaged in cleansing the region of the ‘shirk-polluted presence of polytheists’ (shirk, or ‘the associating of a partner or partners with God’, is anathema to Muslims, and is a charge regularly leveled against Christians because of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity); Hell is said to be the destination of such infidels, and the phrase vujud-i napak-i gabran (‘the impure presence of Zoroastrians’) (gabran probably used here as a generic term for infidels) is a clear echo of the Ithna Asharı¯ Shı¯ ¯ı doctrine of naja¯sat discussed earlier in this article. Iskandar Beg, in quoting Q. 9:36, makes a significant alteration to the text, changing ‘fight the polytheists’ (al-mushriku¯n) to ‘kill the polytheists’ (see Monshi, Tarikh-e Alamara-ye Abbasi, trans. Savory, vol. 1, n. 161). 


https://www.al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-2/section-24-fighting-self-defense-pilgrimage-under#3-holy-war-against-infidelity-idolatry 
infidelity and idolatry is neither a religion nor a creed nor is counted respectful. It is but a kind of superstition, a deviation, and stupidity. In fact, it is a kind of mental and ethical disease which should be, with any possible means, rooted out.
The terms 'honour' and 'respecting others' opinions' are used in the cases that those opinions have a safe and sound foundation. But, sickness, deviation, superstition, and aberration are not some things that can be counted respectable.
That is why Islam orders that idolatry be rooted out from the human societies, however much costly it may be, even at the cost of fighting. Idol-temples and the signs of idolatry, if not possible peacefully, should be destroyed by force.

https://www.al-islam.org/life-imam-muhammad-ibn-ali-al-baqir-baqir-shareef-al-qurashi/chapter-6-his-talents-and-his-genius#rules-fighting-islam 
http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=2743
Nothing is accepted from these people [Arab polytheists] except killing or embracing Islam. Their properties are regarded as war booty, and their families are taken as prisoners. Allah's Apostle, may Allah bless him and his family, practiced that when he took them as prisoners, forgave them, and accepted ransom from them.


https://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/vol2-n3/legislation-islamic-state-ahmad-jannati/legislation-islamic-state 
http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=4584 
[Ayatullah Ahmad Jannati:] The Muslim, whatever corner of the world he may inhabit, is treated as a citizen of Islam and its subject; he has the same rights and duties as other Muslims, regardless of wherever he may live in the U.S.S.R., the U.S.A. or China or somewhere else. However, if in the dar al kufr it is not possible for him to fulfil his Islamic duties, it is obligatory for him to migrate to another place. Also, from the viewpoint of execution of the hudud and ta`zirat, there is no difference whether the culprit is a resident of dar al Islam or of dar al kufr. The non Muslim, regardless of wherever he may live, does not enjoy the privileges of a Muslim, although in respect of the universal sovereignty of Islam he is obliged to perform the duties imposed by Islam on all mankind.
The non Muslim is considered absolutely a foreigner regardless of whether he lives in a Muslim or a non Muslim country. 

http://gemsofislamism.tripod.com/khomeini_works.html
Some of these rules, such as Khomeini's invocation of the `Codes of Omar`, are what Khomeini calls matters of honor (Problem #2834); That Muslims must be politically, economically, and symbolically dominant and not subordinate to non-Muslims. Some of these rules are also defenses of Islam, and meld easily into a defiance of colonial subjugation. Anything that contributes to political, economic and commercial dominance by non-Muslims is forbidden (Problems #2829-2934), and this includes dealing with puppets of the great powers, among which Khomeini primarily mentions Israel ... the buying and selling of televisions and radios (Problems #2889-90) (Resaleh p.xxiii)



http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ayatollah-kill-all-jews-annihilate-israel/#Rtj48gwVQZQ0xS8E.99
5 Feb 2012: Calling Israel a danger to Islam, the conservative website Alef, with ties to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the opportunity must not be lost to remove “this corrupting material. It is a “‘jurisprudential justification” to kill all the Jews and annihilate Israel, and in that, the Islamic government of Iran must take the helm.”
The article, written by Alireza Forghani, an analyst and a strategy specialist in Khamenei’s camp, now is being run on most state-owned sites, including the Revolutionary Guards’ Fars News Agency, showing that the regime endorses this doctrine.
....
Forghani details the Islamic duty of jihad as laid out in the Quran for the sake of Allah and states that “primary jihad,” according to some Shiite jurists, can only occur when the Hidden Imam, the Shiites’ 12th Imam Mahdi, returns. Shiites believe Mahdi’’s return will usher in Armageddon.

In the absence of the hidden Imam, Forghani says, “defensive jihad” could certainly take place when Islam is threatened, and Muslims must defend Islam and kill their enemies. To justify such action, Alef quotes the Shiites’ first imam, Ali, who stated “Waging war against the enemies with whom war is inevitable and there is a strong possibility that in near future they will attack Muslims is a must and the duty of Muslims.” In this regard, Ayatollah Khamenei has issued a fatwa in which he has even authorized carrying out primary jihad in the age of the absence of the Hidden imam under the authorization of Vali Faghih.

The article then quotes the Quran (Albaghara 2:191-193): “And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers] … and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah.”

It is the duty for all Muslims to participate in this defensive jihad, Forghani says. A fatwa by the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini made it clear that any political domination by infidels over Muslims authorizes Muslims to defend Islam by all means.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/03/02/jihad-islamic-jew-hatred-and-najis-doctrine-in-shiite-iran-past-as-prologue/
Briefly, Shiite doctrine on jihad evolved to be indistinguishable from its Sunni counterpart by the late 13th century, i.e., open-ended warfare against non-Muslims. Iran’s theocratic Shiite Safavid and Qajar dynasties, its primary rulers from 1501-1925 (i.e., barring a period of Sunni Afghan invasion, internecine turmoil, and the heterodox reign of Nadir Shah, covering ~ 70 years during the 18th century), fully implemented this warfare doctrine, including the notion that jihad was more laudable in the absence of the 12th imam.
Al-Amili (d. 1622), a distinguished jurist under Shah Abbas I, encapsulated these views in his authoritative manual of Islamic Law. He wrote, “Jihad against followers of other religions, such as Jews, is required unless they convert to Islam, or pay the poll-tax (per Koran 9:29)”
Predatory jihad campaigns (under the longest reigning Safavid Shah Tahmasp, r. 1524-1576) waged against Christian Georgia—punctuated by massacre, pillage, enslavement, and deportation—were consistent with this doctrine. The killing of non-combatants during jihad campaigns was fully sanctioned according to the prominent 14th, and 18th (to early 19th) century Shiite jurists, respectively, Allameh Helli [Hilli](d. 1325), and Sayyid Ali Tabatabai (d. 1816). Allameh Helli maintained there was a consensus among Shiite legalists that if defeating the enemy required attacking and killing children, women, and the elderly, then these actions were to be undertaken. Ali Tabatabai invoked Muhammad’s campaigns against the Medinan Jewish tribe Banu Nadir and his siege of Taif to justify such actions.
......
Through 1923, Jews reported being restricted from leaving their ghettos on rainy or snowy days, at risk of being beaten severely, if recognized by Muslims.
Worst of all, the dehumanizing character of these popularized najis regulations fomentedrecurring Muslim violence against Iranian Jews, including pogroms and forced conversions throughout the 17th, 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries. During 1909-1910, for example, historians Walter Fischel and David Littman chronicled major anti-Jewish pogroms in Kermanshah (a “common” occurrence in 1909), and Shiraz, respectively.

"Musa Raina managed to acquire the office of Wazir (Prime Minister) in 1501. Coincidentally, it was the year when Safavid rulers declared Twelver Islam as state religion of Iran and forced majority of its subjects to embrace Shia faith. Musa Raina continued to administer the state for the next nine years which made the period congenial for Shams-ud-din Iraqi to propagate the Shia faith among the people of Kashmir. Musa Raina ordered the construction of khanaqah for Shams Iraqi at Zadibal in the vicinity of Srinagar. With the constant support from indigenous chieftains, Shams Iraqi acquired a prominent position of a Sufi saint in Kashmir and widened his mission of converting the people into his orientation of Islam. Under the guidance of Shams-ud-din, Musa Raina discarded all secular policies which were once adopted and installed by great ruler Sultan Zain-ul-Abideen. Musa Raina patronized Iraqi and bestowed him with jagir, orchards, gardens, ornaments, costumes, horses, jewelry, gold, etc which were utilised by Shams Iraqi for the construction of a khanaqah at zadibal. He indulged in forceful conversion of Pandit population, destruction of temples and other institutions of Hindus. Musa Raina acquired the reigns of government for nine years in which he took stern measures to convert the people to his faith. He destroyed all the idol-houses which almost included eighteen big temples of Hindus in the city of Srinagar and the adjoining rural areas. Musa Raina resorted to coercive measures and later, changed his policy to appeasement by rewarding those converts who came into the Shi'ite fold of Islam. It is believed that twenty four thousand Hindu families were converted to the Islamic faith mostly by the coercive measures undertaken by state authorities. It is substantiated by the fact that as soon as Musa Raina died, these Hindus reverted to their original faith and customs."
.....
The reign of terror which occurred during the regime of Musa Raina was repeated by Shams Chak. Mir Shams-ud-din Iraqi ordered the massacre of Pandits and polytheists. In 1518, there happened an open massacre of Hindus, in fact a full-fledged state policy was executed in which the most influential leaders and other prominent Hindu personalities were killed who actually used to exercise greater influence on people belonging to their community. The year 1518 witnessed the killing of around 700-800 Pandits who formed an intellectual class of their community which gave crippling blow to the entire Pandit population along with their age old beliefs and customs (the incident is recorded in Baharistan Shahi). By the time Shams-ud-din Iraqi died in 1526, Shi'ism had taken already deep roots in the religious life as well as the politics of Kashmir; not all Chaks (Chaks from Kupwara belonged to Sunni faith) but prominent among them who had acquired huge political eminence and managed to transfer the throne of Kashmir from Shahmir dynasty to their own community, had joined the Shi'ite faith openly by reading Khutba on the name of twelve Imams of Islam.  


http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/10/14/in-the-party-of-god 
Saad-Ghorayeb...quoted from a speech delivered by Hassan Nasrallah, in which he said, “If we searched the entire world for a person more cowardly, despicable, weak and feeble in psyche, mind, ideology and religion, we would not find anyone like the Jew. Notice, I do not say the Israeli.” To Saad-Ghorayeb, this statement “provides moral justification and ideological justification for dehumanizing the Jews.” In this view, she went on, “the Israeli Jew becomes a legitimate target for extermination. And it also legitimatizes attacks on non-Israeli Jews.”
....
despite his assertion that the dispute between Jews and Muslims was political, he made the theological observation that the Jews “never recognized Islam as a true religion.” I asked him if he agreed with this passage from the Koran: “Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans.” Yes, he said. “The Jews don’t consider Islam to be a religion.” 


http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6a64a0.html 
According to Middle East Concern, discriminatory practices against Christians include incidents such as (1) the demotion by the military's Religious Control Unit of some Christian conscripts on the grounds that "no Muslim should salute a Christian . . . [and] . . . no Christian should be in a position where he may have access to confidential information", or (2) sermons by Islamic clerics, such as the Ayatollah Ahmed Jannati's 2 December 1994 broadcast over Tehran radio describing Christianity as "truly lacking in divine and religious spirituality . . . and an arid and useless movement . . . a lifeless corpse" (Middle East Concern, 1995).


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTFAnCPUpjU
http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/189519/did-netanyahu-put-anti-semitic-words-in-hezbollahs-mouth 
Here is an English translation of Nasrallah’s words–somewhat more florid than Netanyahu’s paraphrase–followed by a transcript of the original Arabic:

But I’ll tell you. Among the signs […] and signals which guide us, in the Islamic prophecies and not only in the Jewish prophecies, is that this State [of Israel] will be established, and that the Jews will gather from all parts of the world into occupied Palestine, not in order to bring about the anti-Christ and the end of the world, but rather that Allah the Glorified and Most High wants to save you from having to go to the ends of the world, for they have gathered in one place–they have gathered in one place–and there the final and decisive battle will take place.

ولكن انا اقول لكم. من العلامات  (….) و لكن من الاشارات التي تهدينا وتدلنا وتقول لنا، في النبوءات الاسلامية وليس فقط في النبوءات اليهودية، ان تقوم هذه الدولة (الاسرائيلة) وان يجتمع اليهود من كل انحاء العالم الى فلسطين المحتلة، ولكن ليس من اجل يحكم مسيحهم الدجال العالم، وانما الله سبحانه وتعالى يريد ان يوفر عليكم ان تذهبوا اليهم في كل انحاء العالم، فهم سيجتمعون في مكان واحد -–- فهم يجتمعون في مكان واحد — وستكون المعركة الحاسمة والفاصلة.

 http://antisemitism.org.il/article/86926/rotten-roots-revolution-regime-and-antisemitism-iran 
Khomeini, however, did not just lay the foundation of anti-Zionism. In addition to the hostile attitude toward Israel, in his book he also emphasized the hostility to Jews as one of the central elements in the theory of the Islamic Revolution; He emphasized the suffering caused by Jews to Islam and blamed them for the foundation of the anti - Islamic propaganda, and resorting to various schemes against Muslims. The Koran, as known, portrays Jews with animal imagery such as "a donkey carrying books" or "monkeys and pigs". Khomeini made much use of the negative attitude of the Qur'an, and often cited verses that supports, allegedly, his antisemitic attitudes, where the Jews are depicted as immersed in sins.   
The occupation with the connection between past and present is common among Iranian clerics who deal with the Jewish issue. For example, Ayatollah Emami Kashani, a former preacher at Tehran University that serves as a central platform for expressing the positions of the conservative leadership, often linked between the Zionist policy of the present and the "atrocities" committed by Jews against Muslims in the first century of Islam. Another example can be found in the words of a senior religious authority of Iran, Ayatollah Nouri Hamadani, who claimed that the violent repression of Jewish tribes in Arabia by the Prophet Muhammad, was the elimination of "important Zionist base". 


http://www.hudson.org/research/6370-religious-cleansing-in-iran 
Catholic, Anglican, Protestant, and evangelical churches are not regarded as heritage communities and are afforded few rights. Christian worship must be in the Assyrian or Armenian languages, not in Farsi. Several Protestant and evangelical leaders have been murdered by government agents in recent years, and last year reports surfaced of a renewed crackdown against churches operating in people’s homes, with reportedly 50 or more arrests. Mandeans have sought in vain for official recognition based on their historic ties to John the Baptist.

Members of the Bahai faith, an independent religion that originated in 19th-century Iran, are treated far worse: as heretics to be persecuted outright. According to Iranian law, Bahai blood is considered mobah —that is, it can be spilled with impunity. Over two hundred Bahais have been executed since 1979. An enemy of Islam was written on some of their corpses. In 1979 the Pasdaran (Revolutionary Guards) demolished the house of the Bab, a sacred Bahai site in the southwestern city of Shiraz, and the place where it stood has since been paved over for an Islamic center. The burial shrine of Quddus, a prominent follower of the Bab, was destroyed at Babol in 2004. Bahais can gather only underground—at private homes or in surreptitiously rented halls.
Converts from Islam to any other faith are regarded by the state as apostates who can be put to death. Iran bans non-Muslims not only from proselytizing but from most public religious expression in the presence of Muslims. The Intelligence Ministry closely monitors Zoroastrian, Jewish, and Christian religious communities. These groups are routinely denied permission for formal contacts with foreign co-religionists.
....
The tomb of Daniel, from the Old Testament, is exploited by the regime to promote its relentless anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli propaganda. One mural features an imaginary scene of Iranian forces joining Palestinian fighters in seizing Jerusalems Temple Mount. Nearby slogans denounce Jews, Zionism, and Israel. Jews have stopped visiting the site altogether.
....
 All university applicants must pass an examination in Islamic theology. Bahais have been essentially barred from higher education.
 ....
Minority storeowners must display prominent signs indicating they are najasa (ritually unclean). Bahais have no property rights, and their homes and business are vulnerable to confiscation.
...
Any non-Muslim responsible for a Muslims death faces capital punishment, in accordance with medieval Islamic jurisprudence. Conversely, Muslims do not face capital punishment or even long prison sentences for murdering a non-Muslim, though they are fined. Exceptions are in the murder of a Bahai or a Muslim apostate no compensation whatsoever is required. In a court proceeding, a non-Muslims testimony is valued at half that of a Muslims. A non-Muslim who converts to Islam becomes the sole inheritor of his or her familys assets. 


https://twitter.com/cybertosser/status/929191473714786304 
https://web.archive.org/web/20170308050519/http://islam.uga.edu/sachedina_silencing.html 
1998:
For the Ayatollah Sistani, the more important was the issue
of "religious pluralism" and my treatment of all Abrahamic
religions (Judaism,Christianity and Islam) as equal in the
matter of truth. Such an interpretation, contended the
Ayatollah, would encourage Muslim youths to convert
to Christianity or Judaism because I regarded these
other so- called "Abrahamic" religions as valid.  In
addition, my interpretation of the word islam (in my
1998 Muharram lecture) as not being the name of religion
and just the name of an act of `submission' was not 
supported by grammatical rules about indefinite and 
definite noun in Arabic.
....
I looked at Seyyid Rizvi and asked him to explain the Ayatollah the meaning of 
"civil society."  Seyyid Rizvi kept quiet.  At that point the 
Ayatollah criticized Iran and president Khatami's liberal
views and added: "You love this idea of coexistence 
and pluralism.  What is this nonsense about Abrahamic religions?"



http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1342933.html 
The U.S. State Department's 1998 Human Rights report says Jewish businessman Ruhollah Kadkhoda-Zadeh was executed in May 1998 without benefit of public charge or legal proceedings, although it may have been in connection with his alleged role in helping Iranian Jews flee the country. Usually, entire Jewish families are not allowed to leave Iran together, nor are Jews issued with the multiple-exit visas other Iranians get. Although there is a Jewish member of parliament, they are effectively barred from most other public offices and face barriers in getting public sector jobs. 

Around 20 Muslim converts to Christianity disappeared in 1997-1998 after the authorities learned of their baptisms. Zoroastrians face uneven application of laws and pressure to convert to Islam. 

Muslims also experience varying degrees of repression. The murder last July of Sunni cleric Amman Naroui of Zabol, allegedly by government agents, was never investigated. Sufi organizations report increasing repression. Senior Shia clerics, such as Ayatollahs Hossein-Ali Montazeri-Najafabadi and Seyyed Hassan Tabatabai-Qomi, and their followers, are repressed for questioning the theocratic system and its leadership. 

The situation faced by unrecognized religious minorities, especially Bahais, is even worse. According to the 1999 Amnesty International Report on human rights in Iran, 20 members of the Bahai faith are still imprisoned. A Bahai was executed in Mashhad last July for converting a Muslim woman. Harassment is frequent. 
 




https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=4kGIpMI5HC0C&pg=PA131&lpg=PA131#v=onepage&q&f=false 
Hassan Nasrallah said in a speech delivered in Beirut and aired on Al-Manar TV on 28 September 2001: "What do the Jews want? They want security and money. Throughout history the Jews have been Allah's most cowardly and avaricious creatures. If you look all over the world, you will find no one more miserly or greedy than they are."


http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/05/09/1020914029671.html 
10 May 2002:  When a young Iranian non-Muslim girl attempted to serve food at the mess in the Woomera detention centre in December, she suddenly became the centre of a fierce and violent outburst by a group of irate Muslim men and women. A witness to the confrontation said the 18-year-old girl was verbally abused as a "dirty, filthy infidel" who had no right to be handling food for Muslims. "She argued back, but she was pushed to the ground and kicked and abused," the witness, a former Woomera employee, told The Age.
.....
Church chaplains, pastoral workers and ACM employees have told The Age that the Mandaeans and Muslims who convert to Christianity are regularly targeted by devout Muslims, often Shiites, who also refuse to share bathrooms, toilets and even laundries with them. There have been violent incidents, including the stoning of a group of Christians at Woomera last year which left one man blind in one eye.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1994919.stm 
May 18, 2002: Amnesty International's refugee co-ordinator Doctor Graham Thom says intolerance and vilification are now serious problems inside Australia's immigration camps.
"The reports we're hearing say that Mandeans, Tamils and other Hindus and Christians - in particular Christian converts - are facing violence or threats of violence from certain Islamists with the detention centres.
"They are being called infidels. They are being refused access to kitchens and things like that because people think they are unclean as infidels.
"This has escalated at times when there is a serious breakdown of order within the detention centre when there are riots and things like that and these groups, who often refuse to participate in riots, are physically assaulted," Mr Thom said.
Earlier this month a newspaper report in Western Australia alleged a Islamic leader had called for a jihad - or holy war - on the small Mandean community at the Port Hedland detention centre.



http://www.mandaeanunion.com/mhrg/item/509-amnesty-international-australia-2004
http://iranian.com/BTW/2005/July/Mandaean/AmnestyAustraliaMamdaeansIran.doc 

"The following examples of religious intolerance have occurred under the controlled environment of detention centres:

  1. An 18 year old Mandaean girl was verbally abused, pushed to the ground, kicked and abused by Moslems as she was serving food a the mess in Woomera detention centre in December 2001, due to Mandaeans being viewed as ‘unclean’ by Moslems.
  2. A blind Mandaean man was reported to be seized, defecated on and locked in a toilet in November 2001.
  3. Moslems have refused to share bathrooms, toilets and laundries with Mandaeans.3
  4. A Mandaean woman reported a case of sexual assault by Moslem men on the 28th July 2002. This case is currently being investigated by Australian Federal Police.
  5. Islamists set fire to dormitory blocks occupied by Mandaeans at Woomera
  6. In December 2001 at the Port Headland Detention Centre, a Shi’ite Moslem Mullah was inciting his followers against Mandaeans by preaching that it is lawful to kill Mandaeans and take their belongings.

These attacks have added to the hardships faced by the Mandaeans, which has resulted in attempted suicides in some Detention Centres.



http://www.mandaeanunion.com/mhrg/item/509-amnesty-international-australia-2004
http://iranian.com/BTW/2005/July/Mandaean/index.html 
July 2005:  The Mandaean religion is not recognised as a legal religion under Article 13 of the Iranian Constitution. Consequently they are discriminated against in all policy decisions:
In Iran, particularly severe persecution of minority religions, including executions of Mandaeans and of Baha’is, continues.
All religious minorities suffer varying degrees of officially sanctioned discrimination, particularly in the areas of employment, education and housing.
Recognised religious minorities are second class citizens. Non-believers and non recognised religions are deprived of any rights.
....
The Mandaeans are considered unclean by Moslems, and encounter difficulties when shopping. They are not allowed to touch a Moslem or work in the food industry as they are perceived to render unclean everything they touch. A Mandaean who accidentally touches an item may be confronted with the demand to buy the entire stock as it has been rendered ‘unclean’.
....
It is difficult for Mandaeans to receive medical assistance due to the view that they are unclean. If a Moslem practitioner treats a Mandaean, the doctor is believed to be rendered unclean and will not be able to treat Moslem patients. However it is difficult to see Mandaean doctors as their qualifications from overseas are not recognized within the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they are often therefore forced to hide the fact that they are Mandaeans in order to be able to work as health professionals. It is important to note that reports consistently indicate that while the older generation of Mandaeans was able to study in universities prior to the Islamic Revolution, Mandaeans’ access to universities is currently severely restricted, and therefore it is almost entirely impossible for Mandaeans to study medicine.
.....
Just as many historic Baha’i gravesites have been desecrated or destroyed, on the 4th October 1988 the Islamic regime in Iran confiscated the Mandi (church) in Ahwaz and converted it into headquarters for the Islamic religious police. Eleven years later, in 1999, a Mandaean cemetery was ploughed up, bodies disposed of, tarred over and used for Islamic purposes. Further, Professor Buckley also documents that in 2001, the Mandaean graveyard in Ahwaz was partially destroyed by bulldozers at the order of city officials.



https://iwpr.net/global-voices/mandaean-faith-lives-iranian-south
Shortly after the 1979 revolution, senior Mandaean clerics went to see Ayatollah Mahmoud Taleghani – an ally of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini regarded as tolerant of other faiths – to ask him what freedoms they could expect under the new regime.
They were shocked at Taleghani’s response – that the Mandaeans would be “given an opportunity to convert to Islam.”


http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/mandaeans-4 
By Ayatollah Khomeini’s decree after the 1979 Revolution, the Mandaeans lost their status as a protected religion in Persia, while the status of Jews, Zoroastrians, and Christians remained as before.
.....
Mandaeans experience various forms of pressure and persecution from their Muslim neighbors, especially in Khuzestan. Non-Muslim purveyors of food must set up a sign declaring their religion in their shops, and Mandaeans, not being legally recognized, therefore cannot enter the grocery business. Public sector employment is closed to them, as is, very often, higher education (see U.S. Department of State, 2004, Iran, Section II, Restrictions on Religious Freedom). Mandaean health and education professionals lost their positions after the revolution. Mandi events in Ahwaz are monitored by the authorities. Only recognized religious minorities are permitted to have community centers but, despite the decree, the Mandaeans still retain theirs. As in Iraq, some Mandaeans have changed their names to “generic,” non-Mandaean ones, in order to become more anonymous. For instance, one finds last names referring to well-known tribes, villages, or towns, and Mandaeans may avoid specifically Muslim accouterments or greetings.


https://www.facebook.com/amir.saedi.31/posts/10153856011457853 
Dec 12, 2015: The ‪#‎Islamic_Republic_of_Iran‬, destroyed the cemetery of the ‪#‎Mandaeans‬ in ‪#‎Ahwaz‬, exactly what the ‪#‎ISIS‬ does in ‪#‎Syria‬ and ‪#‎Iraq‬,  
 

http://wiki.islamiccounterterrorism.org/article/Abdul_Alim_Musa
Abdul Alim Musa is a well-known speaker in many places around the world, including at Shia Association of Bay Area (Saba Islamic Center), the extremist anti-Semitic organization based in San Jose, California. Abdul Alim Musa is also a close friend of the infamous Nabi Raza Mir (a.k.a. Nabi Raza Abidi) (legal name: Nabi Raza Mir), the Khomeinist resident mullah at Masjid SABA (SABA Mosque)."
......

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) asserts that Abdul Alim Musa "propagates a radical and anti-Semitic ideology."


http://www.urdu.shiitenews.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=10486:2014-09-14-08-25-46

 محققین نے اس ضمن میں یہ بھی کہا ہے کہ حضور (ص) کی ذات اقدس کو سب سے زیادہ خطرہ یہود سے ہی تھا۔ کفار مکہ تو آپ کے جانی دشمن تھے ہی لیکن یہودیوں کو اپنے شیطانی علم کے علاوہ اپنی کتابوں سے حضور (ص) کے آخری نبی ہونے کی تصدیق ہوئی تھی اور یہ بات مسلم تھی کہ آپ (ص ) کے ظہور کے بعد دیگر تمام ادیان اور کتابیں منسوخ ہونگے جو کہ اہل کتاب کے لیے کسی صورت قابل برداشت نہیں تھی۔

چنانچہ یہود کے بچپن میں ہی آپ (ص) کو شہید کرنے کی کوششوں کے سراغ ملتے ہیں۔ نوجوانی میں پاسدار نبوت حضرت ابوطالب (ع) نے آپ کی جس انداز میں حفاظت کی وہ تاریخ کے اوراق میں محفوظ ہیں۔ جب حضرت ابوطالب (ع) آپ (ص) کو اپنے ساتھ شام کی طرف تجارت میں لے گئے تو راستے میں عیسائی عالم دین نے آپ (ص) کے اندر نبی کی صفات پاکر کہا کہ ان کی حفاظت کرنا یہود ان کے جان لینے کے درپے ہیں۔ پاسدار رسالت ابوطالب ع  نے آپ کی حفاظت کے لیے کوئی کسر نہیں چھوڑی۔ جب آپ (ص) نے اعلان نبوت کیا تو کفار نے حضرت ابوطالب ع کے گرد جمع ہوکر سمجھانے کی کوشش کی لیکن حضرت ابوطالب ع نے اعلان کردیا کہ میں دنیا کہ تمام تر سختیاں جھیلنے کو تیار ہوں لیکن محمد (ص) جو کہ مجھے اپنے جان سے زیادہ عزیز ہے کو کوئی تکلیف نہیں ہونے دوں گا۔

شعب ابی طالب ع میں میرے نبی ص جب محصور ہوئے تو ابوطالب ع کا خانوادہ تھا جو آپ کی حفاظت پر مامور تھا۔ شعب صابی طالب ع میں ایک کربلا برپا تھی۔ میرے نظروں سے ایک کتاب گذری تھی جس میں شعب ابی طالب ع میں میرے نبی ص اور ابوطالب ع کے خانوادہ کے ساتھ جو ہوا درج تھا۔ بعض اوقات انہیں درختوں کے پتے بھی کھانے پڑے اور بعض اوقات پانی ناپید ہوگیا تو درختوں کی جڑ چوستے، زمین کھود کر میرے رسول (ص) گیلی مٹی پہ اپنا سینہ رکھتے تاکہ گرمی کی شدت میں کمی محسوس ہو۔ یہ تمام مشکلات جو رسول پاک ص کے خلاف کھڑی کی گئیں ان کے پیدا کرنے والوں میں یہودی سر فہرست تھے۔  


http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=14285 
http://www.memri.org/report/en/print754.htm 
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/754.htm 
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/memrireport.html 
1 Nov 2002: "Seeing Jews as "descendants of apes and pigs" is common also in Shi'ite Islam. Such statements appear, for instance, in a 1998 speech by Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah on the occasion of the Shi'ite 'Ashoura holiday. Nasrallah regretted that the holiday fell "on the 50th anniversary of the bitter and distressing historical catastrophe of the establishment of the state of the grandsons of apes and pigs – the Zionist Jews – on the land of Palestine and Jerusalem." He closed his speech with these words: "... We reaffirm the slogan of the struggle against the Great Satan and call, like last year: 'Death to America. To the murderers of the prophets, the grandsons of apes and pigs,' we say: ... 'Death to Israel.."
...
When the Christian deputation saw that the Prophet brought with him his relatives from the 'Ali bin Abu Taleb family, they were frightened, and acknowledged his prophetic mission and decided to make peace with him, recognize his rule, and pay jizya [poll tax paid by non-Muslims under Muslim rule]. According to a Hadith of the Prophet, cited mostly in Shi'ite sources, had they instead cursed him they would have been turned into apes and pigs. 

  

http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD12110
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/1751.htm
On July 24, 2006, Al-Jazeera TV aired an interview with Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah. ....
"We love martyrdom. We take precautions in order to prevent Israel from making any gains. But on the personal level, and as a personal aspiration, each and every one of us hopes to be destined to martyrdom at the hands of those people, the killers of the prophets and the messengers, and most hostile to the believers, as it says in the Koran."


https://www.hrw.org/reports/1997/iran/Iran-04.htm
"If a non-Muslim kills another non-Muslim, qisas applies. However, if a Muslim kills a non-Muslim, the law does not require qisas, and does not specify a punishment. Article 2 of the penal code makes clear that the existence of a specified punishment denotes the existence of an offense. Therefore, in the absence of a specified punishment in this instance, the judge may even rule that no offense has taken place in the willful killing of a non-Muslim by a Muslim. Therefore, the penal law applies less value to the life of a non-Muslim as compared to a Muslim and may even permit the murder with impunity of non-Muslims by Muslims.
Other lesser offenses also provide for differential sentences between Muslims and non-Muslims. For example, Article 88 of the penal code states that if a Muslim man commits adultery with a Muslim woman, the penalty is 100 lashes for the man. However, if a non-Muslim man commits adultery with a Muslim woman, his penalty is death. No penalty is specified for the Muslim man who commits adultery with a non-Muslim, woman. Similarly with homosexuality, under Article 121 of the penal code, non-penetrative sex between two Muslim men is punished by 100 lashes. However, if one of the partners is non-Muslim, the penalty for him is death. The crime of malicious accusation is punished, according to Article 147 of the penal code, by eighty lashes if the victim is a Muslim. However, if the victim is non-Muslim, the maximum penalty is set at seventy-four lashes. In this article, non-Muslims are equated in their treatment with minors and those lacking their full mental capacities. Article 494 of the Penal Code provides penalties for violating the corpse of a Muslim; no penalties are stipulated for violating the corpse of a non-Muslim.
The penal code, which is derived from traditional Islamic legal principles, is nevertheless applied fully to non-Muslims whose own traditions of penal law may be quite different.
Explicit discrimination is also found in legal texts other than the penal code. For example, Article 115 of the constitution of the Islamic Republic requires that the president should be a Shi'a Muslim, thus excluding more than 20 percent of population from taking full part in the conduct of the public affairs. Articles of the Iranian Civil Code that deal with matters of inheritance create a privileged status for Muslims. Article 881 of the civil code prohibits a non-Muslim from inheriting property from a Muslim. Moreover, it provides that if a non-Muslim dies and there is among his beneficiaries even one Muslim, this legatee, even if he is only a distant relative, inherits all the property. This article of the civil code conflicts with the constitutional provision permitting religious communities to deal with matters pertaining to personal status in accordance with their own laws and practices.
According to Article 1059 of the civil code, a Muslim man is free to marry a non-Muslim woman. However, the opposite does not apply. A marriage between a non-Muslim man and a Muslim woman is not recognized.
Other areas of legislation discriminate against non-Muslims. For example, according to the law on the selection of judges of 1983, the judge must be a Muslim man. The constitution provides, in Article 163, that the qualifications of the judge will be determined in accordance with the principles of fiqh, or Islamic jurisprudence." The constitution provides, in Article 163, that the qualifications of the judge will be determined in accordance with the principles of fiqh, or Islamic jurisprudence. Many areas of the civil service have an explicitly Islamic mission or orientation, especially the army. The constitution provides in article 144 that, "the army of the Islamic Republic of Iran must be an Islamic army ... and must recruit into its service individuals who have faith in the objectives of the Islamic Revolution." 


http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/83535/irans-decades-christian-persecution-faith-j-h-mcdonnell
The first post-Islamic Revolution martyrs were Anglicans. Islamists cut the throat of the Reverend Arastoo Sayyah, a Muslim convert, in his own office in Shiraz, southwest Iran, on February 19, 1979. In October of that same year, the Rt. Reverend Hassan Dehqani-Tafti, also a Muslim convert, and his wife, Margaret, miraculously survived an assassination attempt in their own bedroom. Dehqani-Tafti, the first Persian Anglican bishop in Iran, was forced into exile for the last ten years of his episcopate after the attack. But in May of 1980, the Dehqani-Taftis’ twenty-four year old son, Bahram, was shot to death on the street in Tehran. Bishop Dehqani-Tafti believed that the Islamic Revolution felt threatened because the Christians were building “a Persian church,” and “a strong and intelligent Christianity” complemented an authentic Persian culture more than Islam. Church property was confiscated, and other clergy, both Persian and British, were arrested and imprisoned. Many more of the Iranian clergy and church members were killed for their faith, and Anglican and other Christian churches in Iran were forced to go underground.
....
 One of Iran’s key evangelical leaders, Pastor Hossein Soodmand, was killed, not by a death squad, but through execution. In December 1990, Soodmand, 55, was sentenced to death in a Shari’a court in Mashad, northern Iran, charged with apostasy and with operating a Christian bookstore and an illegal church. He had converted from Islam in 1964 and had been an evangelist and Assemblies of God minister for twenty-four years.
Soodmand’s fellow pastors pleaded for clemency with the Dayro-E-Tasalamat (an Ombudsman/Muslim cleric whose title means "he who hears the cries of the oppressed").
But it became increasingly clear that the Islamists in Iran were more interested in oppressing Christians than in hearing their cries. At the insistence of the Ombudsman, Pastor Soodmand was hanged on December 3, 1990 in Mashad, which in Farsi means “place of martyrdom.” He left behind a wife who going blind, and four children.


http://en.abna24.com/service/africa/archive/0000/00/00/169169/story.html
2 Dec 2002: "A Kano-based Shiite cleric, Malam Muhammad Mahmud Turi, has called on the Muslims Ummah to unite against the Jewish conspiracy in the wake of the plot to destabilize Islam.

Addressing a rally of sect members in Kano, the Shiite cleric maintained that the planned desecration of the Holy Masjid Aqsa mosque in Qudus is part of the grand design to destroy Islam saying, the Jewish have no place of honour in every dispensation.
...
Citing the example of Lebanon, as the waterloo for the Jews and the recent war in Gaza to buttress his point, Malam Turi Muhammad said, the destruction of the Jews is around the corner adding that, they will ultimately fail along with their collaborators."


http://www.dawn.com/news/108559
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-07-27-iraq-jews-usat_x.htm
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/jews-buying-land-in-iraq-face-death-cleric-says/article1018100/
28 June 2003: A senior Iraqi Shia Muslim cleric has issued a fatwa -- a decree -- ordering the killing of any Jew who buys real estate in Iraq, an aide has said. The Iran-based cleric, Ayatollah Kazem al-Husseini al-Haieri, also said in his fatwa that selling real estate to Jews was forbidden for Muslims. ..."Any Jew who tries, from now on, to buy a lot of land or a house in Iraq should be killed," the decree said. "Selling any lot of land or a house in Iraq to Jews is forbidden."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EK26Ak02.html
26 Nov 2003: On the walls of the mosque in Maalef, a Shi'ite slum in Baghdad, large spray-painted graffiti says, "Kill the Jews". In Baghdad's Mansour district, at the Rahman mosque, faithful Shi'ites heard Sheikh Ali al-Ibrahimi condemn a recent decision by the Iraqi Governing Council to permit certain non-Iraqi citizens to obtain Iraqi citizenship. Ibrahimi warned that "if Jews reside in Iraq then they will become Iraqi citizens and they will own Iraq and we will be their guests". He explained that the founders of the US initially feared letting the "owners of money" enter the country, but that "this happened when the Jews came. The Americans and others became their guests". 

In the large slums of Sadr City, Seyid Hasan Naji al-Musawi, the leader of the Muhsin mosque in this Shi'ite neighborhood declared that the Mahdi, Islam's version of the Messiah, "will be coming soon and when he comes he will kill the Jewish leadership", which he equated with the Americans, adding that Julius Caesar was Jewish, and the Jews were the Romans. Al-Musawi quoted a verse from the Koran prognosticating the eventual defeat of the Jews. 
...

The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, a member of the US-appointed Iraqi Governing Council, sells a book called Jewish Nights, refuting various Jewish claims about their history, and in Najaf, the office of the cleric Seyid Muqtada Sadr sells a book called Ali and the Jews, detailing Ali's conversion of Jews to Islam.
.... 
 The many Iraqis who now have access to satellite television can also watch a Syrian Ramadan series aired on the Lebanese Hezbollah-owned channel "Al-Manar" that provides a tendentious version of recent Jewish history. "Al-Shatat" or "the Diaspora", as the series is called, tells the story of Zionism from 1812 until the establishment of Israel. The series contains familiar themes of Jewish plots to dominate the world.
...
Shi'ites believe that a final battle between Jews and Muslims will occur when the Jews come to the city of Kifil on the Euphrates to visit the tomb of an alleged Jewish prophet. Here Muslims and Jews will fight, and the Jews will hide behind rocks, which will speak and say "there is a Jew behind me", and the Muslims will be victorious.


 


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3581514.stm
20 August 2004: The French broadcasting authority (CSA) took al-Manar to court over the drama,The Diaspora, which it described as "intolerable". ..... Correspondents who have viewed The Diaspora note that it quotes extensively from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.


http://www.christianheadlines.com/news/a-teenager-in-nigeria-counts-the-cost-of-embracing-christ-1368237.html
https://www.worldwatchmonitor.org/2005/12-December/newsarticle_4104.html/
12 Dec 2005: "In August, Shiite Muslims in Akwanga discovered that Idi had converted to Christianity; they abducted him on September 10. 

“Idi was abducted in front of my house and taken to a mosque belonging to the Shiite Islamic sect on Wamba road in Akwanga town,” Ngwenche said. “I went and met the leaders of the Muslim community in this town to protest the abduction. But they claimed that I was holding Idi against his will and was teaching him Christianity without the consent of his relations.” 


http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1049.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1049.htm
19 Feb 2006: Film Seminar on Iranian TV: Tom and Jerry - A Jewish Conspiracy to Improve the Image of Mice, because Jews Were Termed "Dirty Mice" in Europe


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3260391,00.html
8 Jun 2006: Jews are filthy people, and that is why they have been accused throughout history of spreading deadly disease and plagues, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s advisor Mohammad Ali Ramin told students during a visit at the town of Rasht, the Iranian news site Rooz Online reported Thursday. Ramin, a historian who serves as the president's most senior aide, is believed to be the man behind the regime's recent statements that the Holocaust is a myth.

“Historically, there are many accusations against the Jews. For example it was said that they were the source for such deadly disease as the plague and typhus. This is because the Jews are very filthy people. For a time people also said that they poisoned water wells belonging to Christians and thus killed them,” the site quoted Ramin as saying.

“I only know that Jews have been accused of such conspiracies and sabotage throughout history and have not performed well," he added.



http://www.spectator.co.uk/2006/08/hezbollah-cells-await-irans-orders/
2 August 2006: the jovially named Islamic Human Rights Commission run by Massoud Shadjareh. The IHRC is said to be close to Iran. Its understanding of human rights is to extol Hezbollah, endorse an eclectic assortment of jihadis and promote the end of Israel.

  
https://www.memri.org/reports/mohammad-ali-ramin-advisor-iranian-president-ahmadinejad-%E2%80%98hitler-was-jewish%E2%80%99 
In a December 28, 2006 interview with the Iranian website Baztab, which is affiliated with Iranian Expediency Council Secretary Mohsen Rezai, Iranian Presidential Advisor Mohammad Ali Ramin said that Hitler was Jewish, and that Hitler's policies were aimed at bringing about the establishment of a Jewish state. Ramin added that Hitler acted under the influence of his powerful Jewish associates and in cooperation with Britain, since the latter shared his desire to force the Jews out of Europe
 

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL29143722 
29 Jan 2007:  "Nearly a quarter Yemen's Jews have fled their village and sought refuge at a hotel in the Arab country after militant Islamists threatened to kill them for selling alcohol, a government official said on Monday. ...
Just 200 Jews live in Yemen after thousands were evacuated to Israel in 1948.
"The Shi'ite militants of (Abdel-Malik) al-Houthi sent threats to them (Jews) because they sell wine," the official told Reuters. The Jewish community denied they sold wine."


http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1528.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1528.htm
20 June 2007:

Hasan Rahimpur Azghadi: The expiry date of Christianity passed more than a thousand years ago. They are dragging this corpse with them. The expiry date of Christianity has passed, because of its contradictions, superstitions, and polytheism, and because it cannot resolve the theoretical and practical problems facing mankind.
[...]
Islam, in contrast to Christianity, is not a corpse that you have to drag – a reeking corpse, on which you have to constantly pour eau de cologne and perfume, and wash it in order to keep it clean.
[...]
I myself don't believe in preserving such a religion. These Westerners must be very religious, if they have kept a corpse of a religion devoid of content, for a thousand years. Real men they are! They continue to go to church and to read the New Testament. The New Testament and the Torah are so full of strange things that if you read them to children, they would start laughing.


http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1078417.html
29 August 2007: Baha'i International Community (BIC) said it has obtained a copy of a confidential letter from Iran's Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology that was sent to 81 universities. The letter instructs administrators to expel Baha'i students.... "Last year, 200 young people -- without being forced to say they were Muslims when they were Baha'is -- were able to enroll at university. However, 128 of them were expelled within a year," she added.
 

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1802.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1802.htm
10 May 2008: "The Secret of Armageddon" - An Iranian TV "Documentary" Claims That "a Jewish Plan for the Genocide of Humanity," Includes a Conspiracy for the Takeover of Iran by Local Jewish and Bahai Communities

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/4986476/Ibrahim-Moussawi-denied-visa-over-Hezbollah.html
13 March 2009: Moussawi, a Lebanese journalist who edits the militant organisation's main newspaper, is said to have been refused a visa by Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, on the grounds that his presence would not be "conducive to the public good". .... The journalist, who edits the Al-Intiqad newspaper - "Criticism" in English - which is linked to Hezbollah, has issued statements in which he has denied ever making anti-Semitic or hateful comments.
But he was banned from the Republic of Ireland in 2007 when working for the al-Manar television station, which broadcasts from Beirut and has been accused of anti-Semitism. It routinely describes fighters who are killed and suicide bombers as "martyrs", and condemns Israeli forces as criminals.
The station was blocked from broadcasting in France after it screened a 30-part series based on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a forged document setting out a supposed secret Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.
A recent article in the New Yorker magazine has quoted Moussawi as saying that Jews are "a lesion on the forehead of history". Despite that, and repeated opposition from the Tories, the journalist was twice granted permission to travel to Britain to speak, in 2007 and 2008, and was also awarded a PhD in Political Islam from Birmingham University two years ago."


http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/2238.htm
14 May 2009: Following are excerpts from an interview with Iraqi Shiite cleric Sheik Mazen Sai'di, which aired on Al-Kawthar TV, on May 14, 2009.

Mazen Sai'di: As we know, the movement of Salafism, of takfir, and of Wahhabism were created by global Freemasonry, in order to attack Islam in the name of Islam. These movements raise the banner of Islam, but have nothing to do with Islam.


http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/News/1795/-100 
4 Sep 2009:
انہوں نے یہ بیان کرتے ہوئے کہ سورہ ممتحنہ میں تیرہ ایتیں موجود ہیں اس سورہ کی شان نزول بیان میں کہا : اس سورہ کی شان نزول یہ ہے مسلمان کافروں نزدیکی روابط رکھنے سے پرھیز کریں ۔

حضرت آیت الله سبحانی نے تاکید کی : سوره ممتحنه میں امت اسلامیہ اور مسلمانوں کے حق میں خارجہ پالیسی بیان کی گئی ہے ولھذا اس سورہ کی ایات کے مفاھیم کو سمجھنے میں دقت کرنی چاھئے ۔ 
انہوں نے ایات وروایات کے ائینہ میں کہا : وہ کفارجو ھمارے خلاف قیام نہی کرتے اور ھمارے منافع کو نقصان نہی پہونچاتے ان سے معمولی دوستی رکھنے میں کوئی حرج نہی ہے ۔ 

اس مفسر قران کریم نے آیه « یا ایهاالذین آمنوا لا تتخذوا عدوی و عدوکم اولیا....» میں فرمایا : کفار مشرکین فقط مسلمانوں ہی کے دشمن نہی ہیں بلکہ خداوند تبارک و تعالی کے دشمن ہیں اور مسلمان بھی اس ذات باری تعالی سے مرتبط ہیں ۔ حضرت آیت الله سبحانی نے تاکید کی: قران کریم کا نہ ماننا اور پیغمبر اسلام (ص) کو مکہ سے نکالنا کفار ومشرکین کی خصوصیات میں سے یہ قوم ہے جس کسی بھی حالت میں رابطہ رکھنا مناسب نہی ۔ 

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/2250.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/2250.htm
25 Sep 2009:  Following are excerpts from a speech delivered by Hassan Rahimpour Azghadi of the Iranian Supreme Council for Cultural Revolution, which aired on Channel 1 of the Iranian TV on September 25, 2009.
"Today, underlying all the worldwide trends of alcohol consumption, prostitution, Hollywood sex and porn, banking, usury, and sex slavery there are Zionist tendencies. This is true in the U.S., in Europe, and everywhere. There is documented data to back this up. Surprisingly, even in the days of the Prophet of Islam, they fulfilled this same role."




http://en.abna24.com/index.php/219588/print.html
3 Jan 2011: (Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - The Vice President of the Supreme Islamic Shi’ite Council in Lebanon, Sheikh ‘Abd-al-Amir Qablan, denounced the bombing which occurred in front of Saints’ Church in Alexandria, in northern Egypt, and which led to the death of 21 people. Qablan said in a statement: “This terrorist act bears the mark of Zionism, which is accustomed to destroying religious holy places, and is in the interest of Zionism, which seeks to sow fitna, and foment sectarian and ideological differences.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/19/world/middleeast/persecution-defines-life-for-yemens-few-jews.html?_r=0
19 Feb 2015: " Yemeni Jews, like those in other Arab countries, have suffered wave after wave of persecution. Originally many of them lived in Saada Province in the north, which was predominantly Zaydi, members of an offshoot of Shiite Islam that historically were anti-Semitic. The Houthis, whose base is in Saada, embedded that attitude in their slogan, “Death to America, death to Israel, damnation to the Jews.”
The Houthis fought a succession of wars with the central government beginning in 2004, and in 2007, a Houthi representative in Saada gave Jews there an ultimatum: Leave in 10 days or face attack. Yemen’s president then, Mr. Saleh, though a Zaydi himself, became a champion of the Jews from Saada. At government expense, Mr. Saleh relocated them to a gated community in Sana next to the American Embassy."


20 Feb 2009: "A few worried families are all that remain of Yemen's ancient Jewish community, and they too may soon flee after a Shi'ite Muslim militia seized power in the strife-torn country this month.
Harassment by the Houthi movement - whose motto is "Death to America, death to Israel, curse the Jews, victory to Islam" - caused Jews in recent years to largely quit the northern highlands they shared with Yemen's Shi'ites for millennia.


http://standforpeace.org.uk/british-islamists-organise-imam-khomeini-conference/ 
"Shaykh Ahmed Haneef
Haneef is an extremist preacher, who often presents shows on Iranian regime-funded television channel, Press TV...Haneef has presented a number of shows for Press TV on ‘anti-Semitism’, in which he and his guest claimed anti-Semitism was not a real form of bigotry against Jews, and, as a term, is utilised for political means. It is even, Haneef’s guest claims – to no objection from Haneef,  a result of “Jewish hegemony” and incidents of Jews supposedly committing acts of “genocide” against non-Jews.
Further, the programme’s guest claims Jews are driven by a sense of supremacy and selfishness. Interrupting, Haneef says that there are some people who act in a selfish way “who are not even Jewish!” The guest responds that such people do not do so based on a religious text, unlike the Jews."

8 Sep 2009: People critisized Hugo Chavez, the president of Venezuela, of being a communist and an atheist. They further critisized the Islamic Republic for allowing him to enter the shrine of Imam Rida (a). These criticisms were then published by various news agencies. Ahmad Subhani, the head of the Iranian foreign ministry's Latin American sub-section, stated in an interview with the Fars News Agency that Chavez has announced on numerous occasions that he is monotheistic and a believing Christian.

http://databank.isranet.org/article.asp?article=53980
http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/muslims-asked-to-quit-uk-army-for-islam-404864
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/middleeast/article2605472.ece
14 Nov 2009: "The Iranian Supreme Leader’s representative in Britain has told Muslim servicemen and women to quit the Armed Forces, saying that their involvement in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars is forbidden by Islam....In his first interview with an English language newspaper, Ayatollah Abdolhossein Moezi, director of the Islamic Centre of England, said he regretted that protesters were killed by the Iranian security forces after the presidential election in June but that their deaths were “unavoidable”."
==============

Ibrahim Zakzaky

Although the IMN does not promote violence, its imams preach that the West conspires to “dominate minds and resources” of Muslims by converting them to Christianity and secularizing them, Jews are the “lowest creatures on earth” and the “children of monkeys and pigs,”[24] the West fabricated the 9/11 attacks on the United States, and the Nigerian government created Boko Haram to justify Western-Christian “occupation” of the Muslim world and northern Nigeria.[25]
....In 1991, an IMN imam in Katsina (who also spoke at film protests in 2012), Yakubu Yahaya, whose hero was Khomeini, led hundreds of IMN members in an attack on the office of the Daily Times newspaper after it portrayed the Prophet Muhammad in a cartoon marrying a prostitute.[28] In the 2000s, the IMN clashed most frequently with Sunnis in Sokoto, which is the seat of the sultan of Sokoto and where Nigerian intelligence reported that IMN established training camps for recruits from across northern Nigeria.[29] In 2005, IMN imams sought leadership positions in mosques in Sokoto, which led to violence between Sunni and Shi`a.[30] In 2007, Nigerian security forces destroyed the IMN’s headquarters in Sokoto and arrested an IMN imam after a Sunni cleric was assassinated at a mosque allegedly by the IMN in revenge for the cleric’s support of the crackdown on the IMN in 2005.[31] Al-Zakzaky, however, claimed the IMN was framed to justify ousting the IMN from Sokoto.[32] ... When Israeli Foreign Affairs Minister Avigdor Lieberman visited Abuja in 2009, al-Zakzaky said that Nigerian security forces targeted the IMN for Israel because “Iran is waxing stronger in Nigeria through me, and this is why they want to attack us, to finally slay the growing Iranian influence and our movement.”[34]

http://www.islamicmovement.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=618:zionists-always-plot-to-derail-believers&catid=41:frontpage 
25 Jan 2013: "Sheikh El- Zakzaky (H) traced the history of Yahud (Jews) right from Prophet Ibraheem (AS). They transgressed despite all the bounties and favour bestowed upon them by God.  They were taught lessons (for example their humiliation and slavery by the Babylonians). The genesis of their relocation to Yathrib and its environs then was to await the emergence of the last Prophet. However when they saw that Muhammad, an Arab from the genealogy of Isma’eel, not a Jew, is appointed as the seal of the Prophets, they rebelled against God.
They went further to plot the assassination of the Prophet (SAWA) and the destruction of Islam. They were the architects of the battle of Khandaq where they maneuvered and formed allied forces to ransack Madina. This and other notorious acts had to finally drive them away from Hijaz. Sayyid Zakzaky (H) further said that the Jews, like the devil, always aim to derail the true believer of Allah and His Messenger Muhammad."

 http://www.islamicmovement.org/old/yusufalilecture1428.htm
"While giving vote of thank, leader of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria, Sheikh Ibraheem Zakzaky(H) said the Jewish plot against Islam is manifested in Iraq as they sent Bush to capture Iraq for them. Sheikh said if you asked Bush on why he went to Iraq, he cannot give you answer. The only answer Bush will give is ‘the job must be completed’. The units of the American army in Iraq are under the command of a Jew who can speak Arabic."

http://www.islamicmovement.org/old/sheikhonghadeer.htm 
The issues of 12 Imams, sheikh explains, is mentioned in the books of Jews and Christians , they however tried to hide facts. The Jews tried to isolate Ismael  and ascribed every position  only to the children of Ishaq (AS). Sheikh said that it is mentioned in the book of Isaiah that as for Ismael  ‘Twelve princess he shall begot’. Sheikh explained in detail that 12 princess are the imams from the children of Ismael.
Sheikh also explained that  in the Bible  prophet Isa (AS) in the book of Isaiah  was mentioned  entering the city of Quds riding on a donkey which some Christians still celebrate but kept mute about the  one entering  a city riding on a camel.
Sheikh challenged all Christians and Jews to give explanation of 12 princess mentioned in Bible since the Bible explains that all prophesies must be fulfilled. He said that “we Muslims have answer to it’.
The prophet explained them at Ghadder Khum and also in his well know ahadeeths narrated from so many sources to the extent that they can be considered to exceed the level of Tawatur with people of knowledge of hadeeths. He added.
Sheikh However lamented on how the Ummah tried to hide facts as did the Jews and Christians  about Ismail (AS). Sheikh warned Muslims about the  hadeeth in which the prophet AS) explained that this ummah will imitate  the children of  Israel in all cases.
He Lamented on how the Ummah tried to hide facts about Imam Ali (AS) being the successor of the prophet. Sheikh explained that hiding facts about Imam Ali is imitating the children of Israel as they also hide facts about Ismail (AS) and the 12 Imams.
He explained that at Ghadeer the prophet mentioned all the twelve imams one after another. They are the Ahlul Bait (AS), the trustworthy (Siddiqoon), the Leaders (ulul Amr) and the inheritors of the prophet.


http://www.islamicmovement.org/old/speecharbaeen.htm 
"All atrocities in Iraq are carried out by Jews and Americans. Western papers covered that the condition given to Bush by Jews for second term ticket is to invade Iraq. This is not a secret.”"
.....
“where ever an attack is carried out in mosques, it is Jews weather in Maiduguri ( a city in Nigeria) or anywhere else. The killings in Nigeria are also by them. I think in Nigeria Jews don’t have embassy. They are together with Americans in American embassy."
===========

http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/news/1080/-100
13 March 2010:
شھر قم کےمراجع تقلید میں سے حضرت آیت‌الله وحید خراسانی ... نے مزید کہا : ایسی نشستیں جوعوام کےعقیدے کے انحراف کا سبب ہیں معاشرے سے اٹھا لی جائیں  .
اس مرجع تقلید نے یہ بیان کرتے ہوئے کہ انتظامیہ اپنی کوشش سے عوام کے عقائد کا تحفظ کرے کہا: مسیحیت ، بهائیت، وهابیت اور صوفی‌گری جیسی بزم کا خاتمہ کیا جائے  .


http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/news/1693/-100
14 August 2010:
مجلس خبرگان رهبری و جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم کے رکن ، آیت الله سید هاشم حسینی بوشهری ... نے مختلف فرقوں کی پیداوار ، جھوٹے عرفان اور مسیحیت کی جانب جھکاو دشمن کے منصوبے میں سے بیان کرتے ہوئے کہا : انقلاب اسلامی کے دشمن ملک کے اسکولوں اور یونیورسٹیز میں بنے بنائے منصوبہ کے ساتھ وسیع پیمانے پر شبھات کے ایجاد کرنے میں مشغول ہیں کہ اگر حکام وتعلیم وتربیت کے ذمہ دار افراد چالاکی اور ھوشیاری سے کام نہ لیں گے تو بہت سارے سادہ لوح طالب علم کو دشمن کی جال میں پھسنے کی پوری پوری امید ہے ۔ مجلس خبرگان رهبری میں بوشھر کےعوامی نمائندہ نے یہ بیان کرتے ہوئے کہ دشمن نے اسکولوں اور یونیورسٹیز میں خرافی فرقے اور جھوٹے عرفان کی ترویج میں عظیم سرمایہ گزاری کررکھی ہے کہا: ناچیزقیمت پریا فری میں خرافاتی اور مذ خرف سی ڈیز کا تقسیم کرنا یا بعض مسیحی کتابوں کا تقسیم کرنا دشمن کی انہیں منصوبہ بندیوں میں سے ہے جن سے بہت زیادہ ھوشیار رہنے کی ضرورت ہے ۔ 
 

http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/85678/14
4 Sep 2010:
خبرگزاری رسا:امت اسلام از برقراری ارتباط با کفار و مشرکان اجتناب کند
Ummah of Islam avoids contacts with infidels and polytheists
حضرت آیت الله سبحانی، برقراری ارتباط با مشرکان و کفار را به ضرر مسلمانان دانست و با تاکید بر ضرورت توجه امت اسلام به این مساله گفت: دوستی متعارف با کافرانی که علیه ما شعار ندهند، قیام نکنند و منافع ما در مورد هجمه قرار ندهند، مانعی ندارد، در غیر این صورت شرایط متفاوت خواهد بود.
Ayatullah Sobhani considered communicating with the idolaters and infidels to the detriment of the Muslims and emphasized the necessity of the attention of the Muslim nation to this question: "The conventional friendship with the infidels who do not chant against us, do not rise up, and our interests are not about to crush, There is no obstacle, otherwise the situation will be different.

http://www.archive.mohabatnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1341
http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/news/2505/-100 
March 9, 2011: 
حضرت آيت الله حسين وحيد خراساني نے اج بدھ کے روز اپنے سلسلہ وار تفسير کے درس ميں جو سيکڑوں علماء وطلاب کي موجودگي ميں مسجد اعظم قم ميں منعقد ہوا ايران کے مختلف شھروں ميں عيسائي مذھب کي تبليغ سے خبردارکيا

انہوں نے اس سلسلے ميں مربوطہ مراکز اورحکام سے بروقت اقدامات انجام دينے کا مطالبہ کرتے ہوئے تاکيد کي : اس سرزمين پہ عيسائي مذھب کي تبليغ پر پابندي لگائي جائے ?

حضرت آيت الله وحيد خراساني نے عيسائيوں کے عقائد ، کتاب انجيل اور توريت پر مختلف اشکالات واعتراضات کرتے ہوئے ان موجودہ کتابوں کو تحريف شدہ بيان کيا اور کہا : ان موجودہ کتابوں ميں انبياء الھي کي کي طرف نازيبا نسبتيں دي گئي ہيں

حوزہ علميہ قم ميں خارج فقہ واصول کے اس استاد نے ايران ميں عيسائي مذھب کي تبليغ کے حوالے سے مربوطہ مراکز اورحکام سے بروقت مناسب اقدامات انجام دينے کي سفارش کرتے ہوئے کہا : ميں عيسائي ہونے والے نوجوانوں کي تعداد سے باخبر ہوں ?

حضرت آيت الله وحيد خراساني نے کہا : پاپ کي ذمہ داري ہے کہ ان خرافات کے مقابل قيام کرے اور کروڑوں عوام کو ان خرفاتي عقائد سے روکے 
انہوں نے تاکيد کي : عيسائيت کو چاھئے کہ قيام کرے اورحضرت عيسي کے تقدس کي حفاظت کرے  

http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/news/2708/-100 
27 April 2011:
حضرت آيت الله وحيد خراساني نے کتب انجيل اور فعلي توريت ميں الھي انبياء کے سلسلہ ميں جو نازيبا نسبت دي گئي ہيں اس پر تنقيد کرتے ہوئے الھي انبياء کي صحيح و درست پہچان کے لئے قرا?ن کريم سے منسلک ہونے کي ضرورت کي تاکيد کي ہے  



http://mohabatnews.com/en/?p=1987 
1 June 2011: Warning Given by Mesbah Yazdi Regarding the Spread of Christianity in Iran!
 
https://www.worldwatchmonitor.org/2011/06-June/article_114152.html/ 
6 June 2011: “If, for example, Ayatollah [Mesbah] Yazdi says ‘We have to end the Christian movement,’ as he said a few weeks ago, that is enough for his followers in the government to go and arrest Christians.”
In May Yazdi said authorities have not done enough to quench the growth of Christian house churches, considering the “massive funding” the government has spent toward that end. ... Given the “the growth of Christianity in some of the provinces, the actions taken by the government and the judicial authorities, and the massive funding of such programs, the desired results have not been achieved, and this is partly due to the undisciplined attitude and lack of proper supervision of these programs,” Yazdi reportedly said. Yazdi suggested that the government set up a central system to monitor and coordinate the suppression of churches
 ....
Religious leaders also publicly attacked the country’s underground house church movement last fall.  In October, Khamenei said Iran’s enemies wanted to shake the country’s religious and societal values through the spread of Baha’ism and a network of Christian house churches. 
Experts believe these public attacks on Christians, and particularly Khamenei’s, resulted in authorities arresting over 120 Iranian Christians between December and January. Most of those detained were converts from Islam.


http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/news/3148/-100
20 August 2011:
حضرت آيت ‌الله‌ جعفر سبحاني مرجع تقليد نے رمضان کے مبارک مہينہ ميں قرا?ن کريم کے سترہويں جلسہ تفسير ميں جو مجتمع آموزش عالي فقہ قم ايران ميں منعقد ہوئي کہا : يھودي حيوان کي طرح ہيں کہ جو علمي کتابوں کو اپنے پشت پر حمل کرتے ہين ليکن اس سے کچھ فائدہ نہي اٹھا پاتے ہيں ?

انہوں نے سورہ جمعہ کي پانچويں ا?يہ کي شرح ميں اس بيان کے ساتھ کہ يھودي خود کو چنا ہوا خاص قوم جانتي ہے اور بني اسرائيل کے علاوہ کسي کے مقام و مرتبہ کو قبول نہي کرتے ہيں وضاحت کي : خدا وند عالم اس سورہ ميں ہھوديوں کي مذمت کي اور فرمايا ہے اگر اپنے قول پر واقعي معتقد ہو تو موت کي تمننا کرو ?

مرجع تقليد نے اس بيان کے ساتھ ک يھودي اپنے اعمال سے باخبر ہيں اس لئے کبھي بھي مرنے کي تمننا نہي کرتے ہيں اظہار کيا : يھودي شخص جو کہ قرا?ن کو باطل دکھانے کے لئے کہتا ہے کہ ميں مرنے کي تمننا کرتا ہوں تو يہ جھوٹ ہے کيونکہ اگر واقعي موت کي تمننا کرتے تو اپنے تمام مالوں کو خدا کي راہ ميں خرچ کر ديتے ?

انہوں نے اس اشارہ کے ساتھ کہ يھوديوں نے مسلمانوں کے ساتھ بہت مشکلات پيدا کي تھي وضاحت کي : منحرف قوم جو کہ اسلامي احکام کو ختم کرنے کي کوشش ميں ہيں اپني بقا کے لئے الھي ا?يتوں کي تحريف کرتے ہيں

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/11/14/opinion/choksy-iran-zoroastrian/index.html?hpt=hp_bn9
Nov 14, 2011: "When the bloody war with Iraq raged from 1980 to 1988, young Zoroastrians were involuntarily drafted for suicide missions in the Iranian army. Rejecting the Shiite mullahs' claim that military martyrdom would lead them to a heaven full of virgins was futile. Failing to offer their lives on the battlefield could result in execution for treason.
Then in November 2005, Ayatollah Ahmed Jannati, chairman of the Council of Guardians of the Constitution, disparaged Zoroastrians and other religious minorities as "sinful animals who roam the earth and engage in corruption." When the Zoroastrians' solitary parliamentary representative protested, he was hauled before a revolutionary tribunal. There, mullahs threatened execution before sparing his life with a warning never to challenge their declarations again. A frightened community subsequently declined to re-elect him.
Over the past two years, many Muslim Iranians have begun publicly rejecting the Shiite theocracy's intolerant ways by adopting symbols and festivals from Zoroastrianism. Those actions are denounced as causing "harm and corruption" by ayatollahs like Khamenei and Jannati."
......
"Like members of the Christian, Jewish and Baha'i minorities, Zoroastrian activists who protest the theocracy's excesses are sent to Tehran's notorious Evin prison on charges of sedition. At the ayatollahs' instigation, Iranian media characterizes the followers of Iran's ancient faith as polytheists and devil worshipers. Lesser mullahs rant against Zoroastrians not only in Iran, but even at mosques in Toronto."


http://www.iranfocus.com/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4504:senior-iran-cleric-calls-non-muslims-qanimalsq&catid=4:iran-general&Itemid=109
http://www. ettelaat.net/05-11/news.asp?id=10447
Nov 2005: The Zoroastrian representative in Iran’s Majlis officially protested against the Ayatollah Jannati’s statements. For his statement (in Persian).





==============

East End Madrassah, Toronto

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LPbLxNZ5Ss
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/madrassah-booted-from-toronto-school-pending-hate-probe-1.1184281
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/islamic-school-apologizes-for-anti-semitic-material-on-website-1.1184284
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/05/07/islamic-school-under-investigation-for-teachings-about-jews
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/toronto-islamic-school-removes-parts-of-curriculum-casting-jews-as-treacherous-akin-to-nazis
May 7, 2012:  "The Islamic school operates out of David and Mary Thomson Collegiate Institute, a public high school in Toronto. But the complaint was made to police in York because the Islamic school’s mailing address is in that region.
“We are looking into it,” said Masuma Jessa, principal of the East End Madrassah. She said the curriculum document in question had been removed from the school’s website. Later on Monday, the entire school website went offline.
...
The complaints concerned the school’s Level 8 curriculum, which describe historical conflicts between Muslims and Jews. It refers to “Jewish plots and treacheries” as well as “crafty” and “treacherous” Jews.
Another section discusses jihad, which it says means “to strive for something.” But it adds that jihad “sometimes also involves fighting a war against an unjust ruler.” It then quotes Muslim scripture that says about “fighting (in the cause of Allah) is ordained unto you…”
In “Sports and Jihad,” a section of the Level 7 curriculum, it says Islam encouraged boys to engaged in physical training in order to be ready for jihad, but girls were instead to stick to “hobbies” that prepare them to become wives and mothers.
The Level 3 curriculum asks students to color 10 boxes, each representing a branch of Islam. One of the boxes is labeled: Jihad. Later, it explains that jihad “is not just with a weapon, it can be with your writing and speech also,” as well as an internal struggle.


http://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2012/05/03/toronto-madrasah-unlike-the-beliefs-of-the-ancient-romans-the-jews-and-the-nazis-islam-is-not-restricted-to-a-certain-community-of-a-certain-race/
This is the Level 8 Dinyat Text at Toronto’s East End Madrasah.
  Jihad
“Unlike the beliefs of the ancient Romans, the Jews, and the Nazis, Islam is not restricted to a certain community of a certain race, but is for all human beings and aims at human prosperity and salvation. This divine faith requires all Muslims, guided by the holy precepts and instructions of Islam, to endeavor to rescue the oppressed masses to establish peace and justice, and to acquaint the unaware people of the whole world with Islam and Islamic rules and regulations.” pg 71

 End of Jewish Plots and Treacheries 
“Ever since the Prophet’s entry into Madina, the treacherous Jews had vehemently opposed him and his Islamic call, evoking memories of their hostility to the previous Prophet, Jesus Christ (a), half a millennium ago. The crafty Jews entered into an alliance with the polytheist Quraish in a bid to stamp out Islam. They conspired to kill Prophet Muhammad [s] despite the fact that he was lenient towards them and had treated them kindly, hoping to convince them of Islam’s truth.
But eventually as Jewish plots and aggressions increased, he had no choice other than to take up arms against them, in order to protect Islam and the Muslims. At the battle of Khaiber which is famous for Imam Ali’s [a] heroic exploits, the Prophet defeated them ending Jewish intrigues and conspiracies in Arabia.”  pg 111
http://www.friendsofsimonwiesenthalcenter.com/downloads/news_110812.pdf 
East End Madrassa hate propaganda investigation report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgilGw-cs94
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2012/05/08/islamic_school_apologizes_for_antijewish_teachings_on_website.html
8 May 2012: East End madrassa apologizes.

 http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2012/05/17/east_end_madrassah_loses_toronto_school_permit_after_antisemitic_postings_on_website.html 
17 May 2012:  East End madrassa loses school permit after anti-semitic web posts.

 http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/toronto-islamic-school-will-not-face-charges-over-anti-jewish-curriculum-police
8 Nov 2012: A Toronto Islamic school whose teaching materials disparaged Jews and encouraged boys to keep fit for jihad will not face criminal charges but police said their investigation had identified passages of syllabus books they found concerning.
...
The report also confirmed some of the school materials originated from books published by Iranian foundations, one of which is an alleged front for the Islamic regime. The Iranian-origin passages referred to Jews as “crafty” and “treacherous,” and contrasted Islam with “the Jews and the Nazis.”
Police held Principal Masuma Jessa and Imam Syed Mohammed Rizvi responsible.


http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3162/iran-infiltrates-canada
The cleric affiliated with the Islamic Shia Study Centre, Imam Moulana Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi, tried to cover up the now-public scandal by stating that the passages were wrongly copied from two websites; however further investigation revealed that the passages were excerpts from two books published by the Al Balagh Foundation in Tehran, as well as by the Mostazafan Foundation of New York, which the FBI indicated was a front organization controlled by the Iranian regime, currently the leading sponsor of worldwide terrorism, and the president of which, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, is not only outspokenly anti-West, but prominently threatens to wipe Israel off the map.
This material understandably alarmed Jewish groups, who responded that they were dismayed that such material had made its way into the Toronto District School Board. Such textbooks have also made their way into the Ottawa Carlton Public School Board, where Iranian hate literature glorifies a 13-year old child soldier who, under an Iraqi tank during the Iran-Iraq war, strapped on a grenade and blew himself up. In addition, it depicts Jews as the "sons of Apes."

==============

https://www.mrctv.org/sites/default/files/embedcache/113826.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/david-b-harris/irans-fifth-column-target_b_1577752.html
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4240118,00.html
9 June 2012: "Ottawa Carlton Public School Board, a publically funded school board had until 2011 allowed its courses in Farsi on the weekend to use Iranian Ministry of Education textbooks." Harris noted.

"These textbooks included hate literature that included the glorifying of a 13-year old child soldier who had strapped a grenade to himself and blown himself up under an Iraqi tank during the Iran-Iraq war. We've also seen multiple pictures of Ayatollah Khamenei."

Harris noted that "these books were given to elementary school students, and even third graders," adding that "Israel of course was vilified.

"The Israeli soldiers (in the book) looked ape-like and very much reminiscent of the popular Jihadist portrayal of Jews as the 'sons of apes,'" he said.
"There was a grade three text that portrayed a situation in which a six-year-old Palestinian was instructing his three-year-old brother how to stone Israeli soldiers, and then the passage ends with one of the soldiers beating the young child over the head with blood flowing everywhere."


http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/06/27/223021.html
http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/44809
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/717579.shtml
27 June 2012: The teachings of the Jewish book of law, the Talmud, are a driving force behind the international drugs trade, Iran’s First Vice President Mohammed Reza Rahimi said in comments reported on Wednesday.
Rahimi’s remarks, at an international anti-drug conference in Tehran attended by many foreign diplomats on Tuesday, were a rare diatribe by an Iranian official targeting the Jewish faith, rather than the state of Israel.
“The spread of narcotics in the world emanates from the teachings of the Talmud... whose objective is the destruction of the world,” Rahimi said in comments published by the official website of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and state media.
“The Talmud teaches that it is lawful to acquire wealth through legal and illegal means... which gives (the Jews) the right to destroy humanity,” he said.
“If one seeks what lies behind all forms of corruption, there is the repugnant face of Zionists. This is the same case for the narcotics trade ... whose primary operator is the Zionist regime,” he said.
“The Zionists spread destruction not only by drugs, but also by (attacking) cultures.”
Iranian officials have repeatedly courted international outrage with tirades against the state of Israel but criticism of Judaism as a faith has been rare.



http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2012/al-monitor/in-iran-anti-semitic-outbursts-r.html
29 June 2012: Rahimi went on to say that the Talmud teaches how to destroy non-Jews and that 80% of America’s wealth is in the hands of 6% of the world’s Jewish population. He quoted an American researcher, who he did not name, to claim that a Jewish gynecologist sterilized 8,000 Native Americans, which Rahimi asserted was in accordance with the Talmud. He also blamed the Talmud for what he said are anti-Christian and anti-Muslim teachings and claimed that Jews see “others at their service.” Delving into the rich international grab-bag of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, he blamed Jews for the Russian revolution — in which he asserted that “not a single Jew died” — trying to take over the world and fomenting differences between Shiite and Sunni Muslims.
Half way through the tirade, Rahimi seemed to become aware that he had gone too far and attempted a bit of damage control.  “We respect the followers of the Prophet Moses, but we are against global Zionism,” he said. He then blamed “Zionists” for the world drug trade and for opposing “manifestations of independence and freedom of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”  
....
Realizing the international outrage Rahimi’s outbursts would cause, the Iranian regime’s PR machine went into damage control mode. First the English language mouthpiece Press TV published a piece about the speech without a single direct reference to Rahimi’s use of the word 'Yahood,' which means Jews. Thus, where Rahimi said in Farsi that “Jews see others at their service,” Press TV changed that to “the Zionists regard themselves as the master race and they view the other races as their slaves.”
The regime then pulled off the original article from the Iran Student News Agency website where it was first reported in Iran. (The full text of the speech is still available on other websites, including Aftab News.
....
Even US-educated reformist politician Ebrahim Yazdi — who served as deputy prime minister and minister of foreign affairs after the 1979 revolution and resigned to protest the takeover of the US embassy in Tehran — has joined the chorus. While serving in prison recently, the octogenarian (the world’s oldest political prisoner at the time) issued a public letter in which he asked, “how does a president of Jewish descent want to perform his duties? In contrast to Muslims of Zoroastrian decent, Muslims of Jewish descent do not have a good record.” Yazdi referred to dubious material published by Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence in which those who have fallen from the regime’s grace are now accused of having Jewish backgrounds.
 
http://hurryupharry.org/2012/06/27/the-islamic-centre-of-england%E2%80%99s-ex-fascist-on-anders-breivik-%E2%80%98blame-zionists%E2%80%99/
https://cst.org.uk/news/blog/2012/06/27/the-islamic-centre-of-englands-ex-fascist-on-anders-breivik-blame-zionists
27 June 2012: "Living Islam, the magazine of an Iranian Shia mosque in London that calls itself the Islamic Centre of England, is the latest publication to peddle the conspiracy theory claiming that Israel and Zionists were behind Anders Breivik’s terrorist massacre in Norway last year. This one, though, comes with a curious political twist regarding its author.
As Breivik’s trial winds to a close, the editorial in the May issue of Living Islamwarned that people still do not understand the real meaning of Breivik’s crimes:
A more attentive research in the background of Anders Behring Breivik shows that this individual who the media have tried to associate to Christian fundamentalism is in reality a ultra-Zionist, freemason, Islamophobic who claims to belong to the Templar order of the Rose-Cross.
Our understanding is that the main media has said very little on the masonic-zionist ideology of this isolated “illuminato”.
.....
The Islamic Centre of England is closely connected to the Iranian government - its Director, Ayatollah Abdolhossein Moezi, is the personal representative in Britain of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei - so it is not surprising that its in-house magazine should contain the kind of Zionist conspiracy nonsense that the Iranian government and state media regularly peddle.
For example, Moezi himself blamed the inflammatory actions of a handful of crazy Christian Islamophobes in America on:
a conspiracy planned by the agents of international Zionism intent to create tension between Christians and Muslims
But there is a specifically European twist to this particular story. Before becoming the Islamic Centre of England's Educational Officer, Amir de Martino was plain old Marco de Martino, an Italian neofascist who converted to Islam in 1987.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD2MthtFte0
8 Jul 2012: An excerpt from a class taught on Aqeeda at the Ravenstor Summer Retreat (http://seekerspath.co.uk) by Mufti Zahid Hussain al-Qadri who urges Muslims not to associate with Jews and Christians, whom he describes as “deviants” and likens to “drug-dealers” and “alcoholics”.


http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/134032/2032
29 Jul 2012:
آیت الله تهرانی:

Ayatollah Tehrani:
دعای خیر برای مشرک نکنید
Do not pray for polytheists
خبرگزاری رسا ـ آیت الله تهرانی با اشاره به این که دعای خیر نسبت به مشرک مورد نهی است گفت: در قرآن خطاب به پیغمبر اکرم(ص) است: «بر پیامبر و کسانی که ایمان آورده‌‌اند، سزاوار نیست که برای مشرکین بعد از اینکه معلوم شد مشرکند، دعای خیر کنند.»
The Ayatollah Tehrani news agency, referring to the fact that the prayer of goodness is forbidden to the idol worshipers, says: "In the Qur'an, the Prophet (pbuh) says:" It is not desirable for the Prophet and those who believe that it is not desirable for the Prophets after it is known Have mercy, pray for good. "
به گزارش خبرگزاری رسا،‌ آیت الله  مجتبی تهرانی استاد اخلاق و معارف اسلامی در پنجمین جلسه سخنرانی خویش در ماه مبارک رمضان با تأکید بر اینکه دعا برای مشرک مورد نهی است،‌ افزود: دعای خیر نسبت به مشرک مورد نهی است. در قرآن خطاب به پیغمبر اکرم است:
According to Rasa News Agency, Ayatollah Mojtaba Tehrani, professor of ethics and education at the fifth session of his speech during the holy month of Ramadan, emphasizing that the prayer for the Prophet is forbidden, added: "The goodness of the prayers is forbidden against the idol worshipers." In the Quran, the Prophet is referring to the Prophet:
 «ما کانَ‏ لِلنَّبِیِ‏ وَ الَّذِینَ آمَنُوا أَنْ یَسْتَغْفِرُوا لِلْمُشْرِکِینَ وَ لَوْ کانُوا أُولِی قُرْبى‏»،
یعنی بر پیامبر و کسانی که ایمان آورده‌‌اند، سزاوار نیست که برای مشرکین بعد از اینکه معلوم شد مشرکند، دعای خیر کنند.
 البته طلب غفران کردن بخشش است و خیر هم هست. چه خیری بالاتر از غفران؟ البته بعداً خواهم گفت که قیدی در آیه دارد و من نخواندم که می‏گوید: وقتی معلوم شد این‏ها اهل آتش و جهنمی هستند دیگر نباید این کار را کرد.
 "We are Kan Llnbi and Al-Zin Amenova Aen Yastghfvra Lelmhirkin and Lu Kanavah al-Qur'b"
That is, it is not desirable for the Prophet and those who believe to pray for the idolaters after they become polytheistic.
Of course, the call for pardon is forgiveness, and it is good too. What good is higher than the savior? Of course later, I will say that he has a clause in the verse, and I did not read that he says: "When it became known that they were from hell and fire, they should no longer do that."




http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/134950/81
https://www.memri.org/reports/iranian-officials-jews-are-responsible-massacre-muslims-myanmar
8 August 2012:
Ayatollah Ruhollah Qarehi: Judaism, Global Zionism Behind Myanmar Genocide
In an August 8, 2012 interview with the Rasa news agency titled "The Cruel Genocide Against The Muslim People In Myanmar," Ayatollah Ruhollah Qarehi, head of the Imam Mahdi seminary in Tehran, said: "The genocide of the Muslims in Myanmar is ostensibly being carried out by the Buddhists, but we are certain that Judaism and Global Zionism are [behind] the massacre and the genocide against the Muslims... The tenets of Buddhism are derived from Judaism. The Buddhists are a tool [in the hands] of the Jews, and 'Buddhism' is a name behind which [hides] the hand of Judaism and Global Zionism.
"The Jews also run America. Has there ever been an American president, either a Democrat or a Republican, who wanted to get elected and did not put on the Jewish hat or skullcap, and did not explain his ties with the Jews to the Jewish [U.S.] Congress?! Naturally, the hands of the Jews are behind all these events. But, since the Jew knows that he is an [object of] derision throughout the world, he hides behind a pseudonym like 'Buddhism.' Lecturers at seminaries and universities, as well as the media, must [speak up] in various languages and in eloquent terms... and explain to the people and to our dear youth that behind [the term] 'Buddhism' there [hides] the Jew."


http://www.dohi.org/2012/08/construction-of-a-church-in-bahrain-rritates-islamic-republic-authorities/
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/shi-ites-salafists-slam-bahrain-s-king-donating-land-catholic-church
21 August 2012: Mohabat News, an Iranian Christian news agency, drew attention to a report on an Iranian regime-backed website affiliated with the Shi’ite seminary at Qom, slamming Hamad for the church decision...
“Now, Malik Hamad Bin Isa Al Khalifa, dictator of Bahrain, has allowed the first Christian church to be constructed in Bahrain,” it continued. “By giving a construction permit for the first church and catholic vicariate in Bahrain, the king of Bahrain introduced himself as an open-minded man.” (Open-mindedness is not a positive trait in Islamic fundamentalist thinking.)
Mohabat News put the Iranian Shi’ite criticism over the church decision into context. “It should be remembered that after the Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa banning the building of churches of any kind in the country,” it said.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/grand-ayatollah-jesus-an-illegitimate-child/#0CGmLPkRuQgr4ZRd.99 
24 Sep 2012: Grand Ayatollah Vahid Khorasani, a prominent Shi’ite source of emulation and a Twelver, in condemning the insult to the Prophet, not only insulted Pope Benedict XVI but also Jesus and Miriam, stating that if it were not for the Quran, Jesus would not be worthy of God’s heavens.
Khorasani, in a long statement quoting several verses from the Quran published Friday in Hawzah News, the official site of the seminaries in Qom, Iran, claims the only reason Jesus is regarded as holy is due to the Quran and Muhammad.
“Hey, clueless pope who has chosen silence (on the Muhammad video), answer this: If there was no Quran, then as the Bible and the Torah have it, Jesus the son of Miriam is a bastard and a bastard will be forbidden from the heavens of God, and so the high place of Jesus is due to the existence of the Prophet Muhammad as the last prophet by God,” Khorasani said.
.....
Khorasani had previously called the Bible wrong and unjust, a book that does not reflect the words of God but rather one that has been altered.

...
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, not only ordered the burning of tens of thousands of confiscated Bibles, calling it an unholy book, but also ordered the Intelligence Ministry to clamp down on converts, according to a former Revolutionary Guards intelligence officer who has defected to a Scandinavian country.


http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran-cracks-down-on-underground-illegal-churches
15 Oct 2012: In June, Qom’s Friday prayer Imam Hojatoleslam Seyed Mohammed Saeedi told the Organization of Islamic Propaganda that Iran’s enemies targeted vulnerable families in order to establish underground “house churches,” according to Iranian Christian news agency Mohabat News, which works to report violations of Christians’ rights in the country.
Monday’s Fars News report blamed the growth in underground Christian houses of worship on the spread of “Zionist propaganda.”

http://knightnews.com/2012/12/ucf-muslim-group-respond-to-video-jewish-students-call-anti-semitic/
http://knightnews.com/2012/11/speaker-hosted-at-ucf-causing-uproar-among-jewish-students/
29 Nov 2012:  On Nov. 17, the Ahlul-Bayt Islamic Society invited Sheikh Jaffer Ladak to UCF to speak on Islam and Anthropology. Some of his comments, however, have supporters of Israel offended and demanding action take place by UCF against hate speech and discrimination. 
“We are considered Homosapiens, although I will say there are some who have probably, you know, gone backwards, and are more Neanderthal in their thinking, their from Mars, or probably from the state of Israel,” Sheikh Jaffer Ladak said in the video. “That’s why I don’t want this being recorded. I’ll never be allowed back in the states.” 


http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/News/4899/-100
12 Dec 2012:
 حضرت آيت الله جوادي آملي نے تاکيد کي: مشرک اور ملحد پر بھروسہ کرنا مکڑيوں کے گھروں پر تکيہ کرنے کے برابر ہے ، اگر کوئي اسلامي نظام سے فرار کرکے بيگانہ ممالک ميں پناہ گزيں ہو تو بيت العنکبوت سے متمسک ہونے والي ا?يت کا مصداق ہے کہا: فراري افراد خيال کرتے ہيں کہ وہاں سکوں سے رہ سکيں گے اور وہاں ان کي زندگي ارام کي کٹے گي جب کہ يہ خدا کے علاوہ کسي اور پر تکيہ کرنا ہے ، اور اس سے معلوم ہوتا ہے کہ قران کے بيان ميں تازگي ہے ?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp9TTEXOrME
http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=26636&sendtofriend=9319
15 Dec 2012: "In an interview last December 13 on Egyptian television Al Baghdadia, the Shiite ayatollah Ahmad Al Hassani Al Baghdadi issued a fatwa against Christians in Iraq. Labeling them as "polytheists" and "friends of the Zionists", the extremist leader stressed that they must choose "or Islam or death," while "their women and girls may legitimately be regarded wives of Muslims." Al Baghdadi is known for his "jihad" positions and for attacking Americans in the past during their presence in the country, and today he lives in Syria, supporting the armed opposition."

-----
[Extracts  from the transcript of interview]"If they are people of the book [Jews and Christians] we demand of them the jizya—and if they refuse, then we fight them.  That is if he is Christian. He has three choices: either convert to Islam, or, if he refuses and wishes to remain Christian, then pay the jizya.
But if they still refuse—then we fight them, and we abduct their women, and destroy their churches—this is Islam!… Come on, learn what Islam is, are you even a Muslim?!      As for the polytheists [Hindus, Buddhists, etc.] we allow them to choose between Islam and war!  This is not the opinion of Ahmad al-Husseini al-Baghdadi, but the opinion of all five schools of jurisprudence [four Sunni and one Shia].


http://archive.mohabatnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6212
Jan 2013:
In a statement, Ayatollah Noor-Allah Tabarsi, the Friday Prayer Imam in Sari, defamed Christianity and called today's Christians "a shame for Christianity". Ayatollah Tabarsi, who is also the Supreme Leader's representative in Mazandaran province, claimed that all the corruption in the west was due to the inappropriate application of Christianity!
......
Another report on January 7 noted that Ayatollah Jafar Sobhani, who is based in Qom, warned once more against the growth of house churches in society and called on Islamic seminaries to be alert in this respect. The pro-regime Ayatollah also said that house churches attract ungodly youth who have gone astray and try to induce them to accept their faith.



http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/191/-100
13 March 2013: Ayatollah Noori Hamadani: “We must act bravely in front of America, Zionist, EU, Wahhabism, and the hypocrites. With all the bloodsheds and oppressions they did, they have proved that they are after destruction of Islam” he added, considering the Jihad and braveness in front of the spiteful internal and external enemies as an attribute of a believer.
...In mentioning the events of the Ahzab war, he said: “In this war, Jewish, blasphemy and hypocrisy were united, hand in hand, to destroy Islam. Today the same side is united on front against Islam. So we should confront them with the help of the great hero of the Khandagh war, Imam Ali and with courage, awareness and vigilant”.
 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9933328/Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-accused-of-heresy.html
15 March 2013: Ayatollah Ahmed Janati, the hardline chief of the Guardians Council, told worshippers at Friday prayers in Tehran: "Those comments on Chavez's return with Christ were heresy."
Janati was referring to comments by Ahmadinejad on March 6 in which he called Chavez a "martyr" who would "return, along with the righteous Jesus and the perfect human."
The last was an allusion to Shia Islam's 12th imam that Iran's majority faith believes will return with Christ to bring peace and justice to the world.
Janati said Iran's clergy had been "upset" by the remarks.
"Should people say whatever comes to mind? I wish (Ahmadinejad) had spent a few days in a seminary before discussing such issues," he said.
"Chavez was a populist and anti-American. His political agenda was completely acceptable. But he was not a Muslim," Janati added.


http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/news/5647/4
15 July 2013:

آیت‌ الله مصباح یزدی نے ان کی ایات، جن میں جھاد فی سبیل اللہ کے دنیاوی فوائد کا اشارہ کیا گیا ہے کہا: قران نے مومنین سے خطاب میں فرمایا کہ « خدا کے دشمنوں سے لڑو تاکہ انہیں شکست دے سکو اور خداوند متعال تمھارے ہاتھوں انہیں عذاب کا مزا چکھا سکے »

انہوں نے تاکید کی: کافر و مشرک، مسلمانوں کے ہاتھوں عذاب دئے جائیں در حقیقت یہ ایت قران کریم کے وحدانی پیغامات میں سے ہے  ۔

امام خمینی(ره) تعلیمی و تحقیقی سنٹر کے سربراہ نے اخر میں بیان کیا: اس دنیا میں جھاد فی سبیل اللہ کا ایک اور فائدہ، دشمن خدا کی رسوائی اور مومنین کے دلوں کی خوشحالی ہے  ۔




https://www.worldwatchmonitor.org/2013/10/article_2749988.html/
https://www.worldwatchmonitor.org/research/2745230
22 August 2013: Some Christian women have lost custody of their children after their divorces from Muslim men because they are judged as Christians to have forfeited their rights. In one case, the judge told a mother of a two-year-old daughter that she could retain custody of her daughter if she became Muslim. Meanwhile, many Christians are forced to marry in Muslim ceremonies and to conduct Islamic funerals for Christian family members.
...
The government confiscated and burnt thousands of Bibles translated in Persian which was distributed in Iran in 2010 and 2011....Non-Muslim food sellers such as Armenians were required to put a notice outside their shops to state they belong to religious minorities so that Muslims do not buy from them.




http://dailycaller.com/2013/11/30/iran-quran-has-marked-israelis-as-rabid-dogs-and-pigs/#ixzz46ZgEoMD9 
30 Nov 2013: “This vicious temperament of dogs and pigs is you (Israel),” said Ayatollah Mohammad Imami Kashani, a member of the Assembly of Experts, the body that appoints the supreme leader, at Tehran’s interim Friday prayer. “The Quran has marked on your foreheads that you will be humiliated. The Zionist officials are like animals, and truly as rogue thugs they do whatever they want, killing people, creating bloodshed and destroying whatever they want.”
Kashani said at this week’s Friday prayers sermon in Tehran that whenever Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears on television, “all of the world hates you. You are hated, humiliated and despicable and,” the ayatollah added in a putrid insult to make to a Jew, “have been immersed in the flesh of rabid dogs and pigs.”


https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2014/nea/238454.htm
In November the Friday prayer leader in Rafsanjan reportedly declared in a speech that, according to religious fatwas, Bahais were “unclean” and it was forbidden to conduct business with them.
There were reports of Shia clerics and prayer leaders denouncing Sufism and the activities of Sufis in both sermons and public statements. According to a December 22 report by Majzooban Noor, a Shia group in Karaj sponsored a series of speeches against Sufism and put up related posters in front of the city’s Sufi congregation hall. According to the report, authorities intervened and removed the posters in an effort to reduce tensions.
In May a Muslim cleric in the city of Islam-Abade-Gharb publicly declared that members of the Yarsani community were devil worshippers, thus “impure” and “un-Islamic.” Yarsani community members reported harassment targeted against Yarsani men because their long moustaches identified them as Yarsani.



http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/7823.htm
On January 19, 2014, Ayatollah Nouri Hamedani said: "The Muslims should strengthen their defense and military industries so that the faithful can stand fast against the enemies. The Koran mentions that the infidels, Jews, hypocrites [i.e. the Iranian oppositionist group Mojahedin-e Khalq], and Zionists are your enemies. As you see, today a deviant and extremist sect known as Wahhabism, and the takfiris, are working for the enemies of Islam."[10] On February 2, 2014, Hamedani reiterated: "According to the Koran, the infidels, hypocrites, and Zionists are the enemies of the house of faith... We always must struggle against the infidels headed by America and Britain, the traitors, and the Zionists, and must be aware of their plans and of the fact that we cannot reach an agreement with them... Nowadays the takfiris, who enjoy the support of Saudi Arabia, have also joined our enemies. Saudi Arabia is using its income from its gas and petroleum to fight the Shi'ites, and is a tool of America."[11]


http://ur.rasanews.ir/detail/News/6638/1
14 April 2014:
حضرت آیت الله حسین نوری ھمدانی نے آج ظھر سے پہلے رسالت بینک کے ملازمین سے ملاقات میں اس بات کی تاکید کرتے ہوئے کہ اسلام اور قران کریم کی نگاہ سے دوگناہ نہایت بدترین و عظیم گناہ ہیں کہا: ایک ربا اور دوسرے کفار کی آمریت کے سامنے سرتسلیم خم کرنا و نیز امریکا و کفار سے دوستی ۔

انہوں نے مزید کہا: فقہی حوالہ سے ربا حرام ہے اور قران کریم میں سات جگہ اس کا تذکرہ کیا گیا ہے ، ربا اور سود خوری خطرناک و بدترین موضوع ہیں اور عوام کا خون چوسنا ہے ۔


http://www.humanrights.asia/news/urgent-appeals/AHRC-UAC-086-2014
11 June 2014: According to the information received by the AHRC, Mr. Sharafat Din, 35 years of age, the son of Ahmed Mir and a resident of Gilgit-Baltistan province Pakistan, who hails from the Shia Sect of Islam, on his own choice adopted the Ahmadi faith in June last year (2013)... No sooner, Mr Sharafat Din adopted the Ahmadiyya faith he had started receiving threats from his family members, including his in-laws, his employer, Muslim militant groups, from even the law enforcement agencies such as the police and security guards posted in Gilgit-Baltistan province bordering China. The AHRC also learnt that Mr. Din, his wife and son had all been kidnapped.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6jEx47xJ7k 
http://ara.tv/2j2mk 
http://en.iranwire.com/features/5889/ 
1 July 2014: Iran’s state broadcaster, known as Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, IRIB, has never been the country’s most dignified institution. But even by its own standards, the network plunged into a fresh abyss of superstition and fear-mongering with a recent broadcast in which Valiollah Naghipourfar, a cleric and professor at Tehran University, discusses the use of jinns, or genies, in public life. “Can jinns be put to use in intelligence gathering?” the presenter asks ingenuously, as though dragons can also serve as defense ministers and we’ve all entered the realm of the Hobbit. The cleric nods, as though speaking about a species of exotic elf: “The Jew is very practiced in sorcery. Indeed most sorcerers are Jews.”


http://blog.adl.org/international/iran-broadcasting-enters-ramadan-with-anti-semitism
1 July 2014: IRIB’s 24-hour news net­work, Islamic Repub­lic of Iran News Net­work (IRINN), aired a short doc­u­men­tary, called “Zion­ist Aspi­ra­tions to Con­trol the West.” The doc­u­men­tary pro­moted anti-Semitic canards of alleged Zion­ist and Jew­ish con­trol of U.S. pol­i­tics and poli­cies, Hol­ly­wood, and academia.
The doc­u­men­tary employed the terms “Zion­ist” and “Jew­ish” inter­change­ably, claim­ing that one of Pres­i­dent Obama’s biggest sup­port­ers is Gold­man Sachs, “America’s largest bank­ing net­work that has no non-Jewish own­ers and who are all Zion­ists and sup­port­ers of Israel.” The doc­u­men­tary also shows a graphic of the globe with a Star of David super­im­posed on it fol­lowed by the logo of AIPAC, claim­ing that the most pow­er­ful lobby in the U.S. “works for the inter­ests of another coun­try and every­one knows which one.” Pic­tures of sev­eral high-ranking offi­cials in global finance, such as for­mer chair­man of the Fed­eral Reserve Ben Bernanke and for­mer IMF Man­ag­ing Direc­tor Dominique Strauss-Kahn, were depicted as the Jew­ish hands in con­trol of the global economy.
Inter­spersed with scenes from Schindler’s List, the doc­u­men­tary also claimed that Jew­ish and Zion­ist con­trol of Hol­ly­wood have built their stature by exploit­ing the Holo­caust and anti-Semitism, com­par­ing it to when “the Chil­dren of Israel built the golden calf dur­ing Moses’ absence and began wor­ship­ping it.” The nar­ra­tor added that, “Zion­ist elites even say that non-Jews are not rec­og­nized as human beings and only Jews have importance.”

http://www.mwmpak.org/index.php/en/2015-04-23-09-10-57/2015-04-23-09-14-41/item/5297
14 July 2014:
ایم ڈبلیوایم کےمرکزی  رہنما علامہ اعجاز بہشتی نے کہا کہ قرآن نے دشمن اسلام یہود و نصاریٰ کے ساتھ دوستی سے منع کیا ہے۔ یہ پیغام خدا کا ہے کہ یہود و نصاریٰ کو دوست نہ بناو۔ ہمارا دشمن یہود ہے، ہمیں اس دشمن حقیقی سے مقابلہ کے لئے قرآن سے رہنمائی لینا ہوگی۔ جس طرح اللہ نے موسی علیہ السلام کو کہا تھا کہ فرعون سے نجات پانا چاہتے ہو تو اللہ سے مدد مانگو۔

http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/991/-100
12 Aug 2014:
Ayatollah Beheshti continued by stating: “We cannot compromise with the enemy with resolutions, compliments and smiles, because they only want to be deceive Muslims with their promises and to scare them with their threats. In the face of their tricks, there is no other way except resistance.”

His Eminence explained that the Quran states that the success of Muslims causes the unbelievers to become disheartened, and he recited this following verse: “If good befalls you, it grieves them, and if an evil afflicts you, they rejoice at it; and if you are patient and guard yourselves, their scheme will not injure you in any way; surely God comprehends what they do.” [3:120]

He then added: “Patience and piety are a form of resistance. Besides resistance, there has been and never will be any other way to counter the enemies.”


http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/1159/-100 
16 Sep 2014: Ayatollah Alavi-Gorgani has explained that Zionism is the greatest enemy of humanity and said history has shown that the Zionist Jews have slaughtered innocent people throughout their history and have showed that they not afraid of anything to achieve power, including inhuman methods.
....
 “We have a narration from the Commander of the Faithful [Imam Ali] (A) that in one day between dawn to sunrise, the Israelites killed seventy prophets and then went to their markets to buy and sell if they did not do such a thing. What the Zionists are doing today is a lot like their approach to the killing of the prophets,” Ayatollah Alavi-Gorgani explained.

He pointed out that history has proved that the Jews do not hesitate to slaughter innocent people and shed blood, saying: “Zionists have spared no effort to do everything they can to commit inhumane acts in order to obtain power and achieve their goals… Zionists believe that the goal justifies the means, and are always trying to flex their muscles and flaunt it even if the price is the blood of innocent people and their honour, whereas Islam is strongly opposed to this way of thinking.”

Ayatollah Alavi-Gorgani stated that God has explained in the Quran that there are three groups fighting the believers: the Jews, Christians and polytheists. God considered the Christians closer to the believers than the others, and considered the Jews the strongest men in enmity to the believers. This has proven true, Ayatollah Alavi-Gorgani explained, “Because global Zionism is considered the biggest threat to the entire human race.”

He stressed that the Zionist movement among the Jewish community is not rational, and stated that in the Holy Quran, the Almighty Lord has warned the believers about the Jews, Christians and polytheists, though Christians are closer to the truth because they resort to their scholars.

In conclusion, His Eminence pointed to the small population of the illegitimate Zionist entity, saying: “despite the small population of the Zionist entity, its many evils are due to the lack of truthful scholars leading its people.”


http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/223625/14
1 Oct 2014:
مؤمنان واقعی شیفته و مفتون کفار نمی‌شوند
Hojjatoleslam and Muslims Seyed Mohammad Saeedi : True believers will never be enthralled and charmed by infidels.

وی خاطرنشان کرد: افرادی که ادعای پیروی آیین پیامبر اکرم(ص) و اهل بیت عصمت و طهارت(ع) را دارند، با کفار به شدت برخورد می‌کنند، به آنان هرگز اعتماد نکرده و شیفته و مفتونشان نمی‌شوند، علاقه‌ای به نزدیکی به دشمنان ندارند و اگر دشمن از آنان تعریف و در رسانه‌هایش یاد کرد، باور نکرده و راضی نمی‌شوند.
He pointed out that those who claim to follow the ritual of the Prophet (PBUH) and the family of the Prophet (PBUH), are harsh on infidels, never trust them, and are not attracted to them; they are not interested in being close to enemies. And if the enemy has defined them in the media, they will not believe and will not be satisfied.
http://standforpeace.org.uk/hardline-pro-regime-cleric-to-speak-at-islamic-centre-of-england/
7 Oct 2014: Sodagar is a noted Khomeinist who studies in the Iranian city of Qom, the ideological base for Iranian theocracy. Sodagar promotes Iranian regime conspiracy theories that the “war in Syria is because of Israel. … People in Egypt…and people in Lebanon are being killed because of the Zionist entity. … Some are claiming that 9/11 was an Israeli project.” He repeatedly echoes Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei’s description of Israel as a “cancerous tumour”. Sodagar claims that American and Europeans, whom he describes as “kuffar”, are puppets of Jewish lobby groups, that a “Zionist web of media is trying to control the minds of the people” and that “Zionist companies” hold the economies of the world’s countries to ransom. He has also said that accusations of anti-Semitism are employed by the Israeli government as a fig leaf to hide its actions. In addition, Sodagar is vocally anti-gay, and has stated that Western tolerance for homosexuality is the inevitable product of “legal and moral value systems that are based purely on democracy.”
Despite these views, Sodagar has frequently spoken in the UK before, including at an interfaith event at St Andrews University designed to “improve relations on campus” between Muslim and Jewish students. The Islamic Centre of England, where Sodagar will be speaking, is one of the key institutions for the Iranian regime in the UK.  Abdolhossein Moezi, the Director of the Centre, is described in the Centre’s own incorporation documents as Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s “personal representative” to the UK.


http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/1628/-100
14 Nov 2014: Refering to American and Israeli officials, Ayatollah Tabatabaeinejad said that most Jews and Christians can never be the guardians of Muslims as they are the enemies of Islam. Jews and Christians will never love or accept Islam. Even the Quran states that they will never be satisfied with Islam.

The Friday prayer of Esfahan stating that the arrogant people, especially the Jews and Christians, have a deep hatred towards Islam in their hearts, saying: “They do not have pure hearts and will never stop fighting against Islam. Their problem [with Iran] it is not due to the nuclear energy issue. It is just an excuse. Rather they are against Iran even progressing slightly in the fields of technology,” he stated. 


http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/231195/2032 
16 Nov 2014:
 حجت الاسلام والمسلمین میرباقری مطرح کرد؛
یهود صحنه گردان اصلی واقعه کربلا
خبرگزاری رسا ـ استاد حوزه و دانشگاه با بیان این که آیات ابتدایی سوره اسرا به دومین سرکشی قوم یهود در برابر خداوند اشاره دارد، گفت: این آیات به صراحت قوم یهود را در واقعه کربلا دخیل دانسته و شهادت امام حسین(ع) را به توطئه و نقشه شوم یهود نسبت می دهد.
Hujjat al-Islam and Muslim Brotherhood raised;
The Jew were the main behind-the-scene culprits of Karbala event
"The verses explicitly involved the Jewish people in the incident of Karbala and condemned the martyrdom of Imam Hussein (AS)," Rasa said, referring to the first verses of the Surah Israh to the second suppression of the Jewish people against the Lord. And the Jewish map of the plan.
به گزارش خبرنگار خبرگزاری رسا، حجت الاسلام و المسلمین سید محمد مهدی میر باقری، استاد حوزه و دانشگاه، بعد از ظهر امروز در برنامه تلویزیونی سمت خدا از شبکه سه سیما با بیان این که آیات قرآن کریم در جاهای مختلفی قوم یهود را به خاطر سر کشی و طغیان مورد سرزنش قرار داده است، گفت: آیات ابتدایی سوره اسرا به صراحت قوم یهود را در واقعه کربلا و سرکشی و طغیان بزرگ انسان ها یعنی شهادت امام حسین(ع) محکوم کرده و آنها را مقصر شهادت امام حسین(ع) و یارانشان می داند.
According to Reza News Agency, Hojjatoleslam and Muslim Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi Mir Bagheri, university professor and university professor, in the afternoon of the TV program on the part of God from the network of three Sima, saying that the verses of the Holy Qur'an in different places, the Jewish people for the sake of the head He said: "The first verses of the Surah al-Asra have clearly condemned the Jewish people in the incident of Karbala and the great rebellion and great outbreak of human beings, the martyrdom of Imam Hussein (AS), and blamed them for the testimony of Imam Hussein (AS) and Knows their helpers.
حجت الاسلام والمسلمین میرباقری با بیان که در اصول کافی در روایتی از رسول اکرم(ص) بر فسادهای انسان اشاره شده و سرکشی در برابر دین و اجرای دستورات دین و حب دنیا را نخسیتن سرکشی انسان در برابر خداوند معرفی کرده است، گفت: دومین سرکشی انسان در برابر خداوند شهادت امام حسین(ع) است که خداوند در این زمینه در آیات ابتدایی سوره اسرا قوم یهود را مورد سرزنش قرار می دهد که  این امر حکایت از دشمنی مستقیم قوم یهود با مسلمانان دارد.
Hojjatoleslam and Muslim Brotherhood, arguing that its narrated in Asul Kafi of the Prophet (peace be upon him) refer to human corruption, and rebellion against religion and the implementation of the orders of religion and the world, has been introduced by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH & HP) to God, said the second rebellion Human beings are martyrdom of Imam Hussein (AS) before God, in which God blames the Jewish people in the first verses of Surah al-Asra, which is a direct enemy of the Jewish people to Muslims.



http://www.christiansinparliament.org.uk/uploads/APPGs-report-on-Persecution-of-Christians-in-Iran.pdf
March 2015: Since the 1979 Revolution, the government has not granted a licence for the establishment of a new church organisation or allowed the construction of any church building, Orthodox, Protestant, or other. It has required recognised churches to limit attendance to those who are not from a Muslim background, and to conduct services only in the minority languages of Assyrian or Armenian. Churches have also been closed down, and had leaders arrested, if they refused to comply with these restrictions. 

"During Ahmadinejad’s government, they closed many formal churches in Iran, and we had to go to home churches. And they told us - especially Ayatollah Khamenei said very officially - that home churches are against the law, and you should not go to home churches, just the official churches. And they closed the official churches - so what should we do?" (Mostafa Bordbar, video testimony, filmed 27 November 2014).

http://en.abna24.com/service/iran/archive/2015/04/27/686656/story.html
17 April 2015: "Pointing at the history of the emergence of nudity, homosexuality and immorality in Hollywood he said: Protestants and Catholics tried to stop this trend and purge the industry but they failed against the Jewish conspiracy. The Jews, by the excuse of holocaust, used nudity at first. The church remained silent against this immoral action and they failed against the Jewish cultural war.

Pointing out the number of Jews in Hollywood he said that 95% of people active in Hollywood are Jews and Hollywood is a practice field for anti-cultural and anti-social activities.

This immorality in the movies is the Jewish weapon in cultural war, he said. The immorality has blinded people and deprives them of thinking abilities."


http://mohabatnews.com/en/?p=1979
1 May 2015: According to Mohabat News, Ayatollah Jafar Sobhani, an Iranian Islamic religious expert who is known for his exaggerations, warned against anti-Shi’ite activities in Khuzestan province (western Iran). He told Islamic seminary students and professors of the Islamic seminary of Masjed-Soleiman in the religious institute of Imam-Sadeq in Qom, “Enemies of the Islamic revolution and the Islamic regime of Iran are investing money and providing means to make the people of Khuzestan turn their back on Shi’ite Islam. However, we should be cautious, and not let house churches be planted, or Wahhabis promote their faith in people’s homes”.


http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/2786/-100
19 June 2015:
Hujjat al-Islam Sa’idi referred to verse 4:141 of the Holy Quran, and explained that this verse says Muslims and their lands should not be dominated by the unbelievers. “But unfortunately, the leaders of many countries in the region have opened their countries to the domination of the West. If Muslims increased their familiarity with the Quran, they will be able to defeat the unbelievers and the oppressors,” he explained.


http://hawzahnews.com/detail/News/352509
25 June 2015:
حضرت آیت الله سبحانی با اشاره به بیان آیت الله العظمی بروجردی در خصوص این محور و میثاق گفتند: این مرجع بزرگ جهان تشیع فرمود،  تمام این مذاهب ساختگی در عالم برای مبارزه با این اصل و این میثاق خدایی یعنی اصل توحید، گردهم جمع شده اند.
Ayatullah Sobhani, referring to the statement of the great Ayatullah Borujerdi, said about this axis and the covenant: The great reference of the world has given Shi'ism, all these fabricated religions in the world have gathered to fight this principle and this covenant of God, the principle of monotheism.
هند، موزه ادیان مشرکانه است
معظم له بیان کردند: امروز همه،  هند را یک کشور اتمی می دانند، ولی این کشور هنوز هم موزه ادیان مشرکانه است و همه چیز در این کشور پیدا می شود؛  متاسفانه باوجود گذشت 14 قرن از هجرت پیامبر(ص)، هنوز بسیاری از مردم جهان بت پرست و مشرک هستند و چیزهایی را مقدس می دانند که قابل تصور نیست.
India is a museum of polytheistic religions
Supreme Leader said: "Today, everybody considers India a nuclear country. But this country is still a museum of polytheistic religions. Everything is found in this country. Unfortunately, even after 14 centuries since the Prophet's emigration, many people in the world are still idolatrous and polytheistic, and they consider those things sacred that are not conceivable.
رشد تکنولوژی همیشه به رشد معرفت و عقل نمی انجامد
The growth of technology does not always lead to the growth of knowledge and reason
ایشان گفتند:
 یکی از نمونه های دیگر را می توان در کشور ژاپن که همه وسایل پیشرفته را می سازد جستجو کرد که در این کشور نیز بت پرستی وجود دارد و با این وجود باید گفت،  رشد تکنولوژی همیشه به رشد معرفت و عقل نمی انجامد.
He said: Another example can be found in Japan, which produces all the advanced equipment but there is also idolatry present in the country; however, it should be said that the growth of technology does not always lead to the growth of knowledge and reason.
....
معظم له با اشاره به سالروز وفات حضرت ابوطالب بیان کردند: این حضرت 42 سال از پیامبر(ص) حمایت کردند و سه سال در سخت ترین شرایط کنار پیامبر بودند، ولی متاسفانه عده ای در ایمان این حضرت تشکیک می کنند.
The Holy Prophet, referring to the anniversary of the death of Hazrat Abu Talib, stated: "The Prophet (peace be upon him) 42 years supported the Prophet (peace be upon him), and for three years he was in the most difficult conditions with the Prophet, but unfortunately, some of them are in the faith of this Prophet.
صحیح بخاری دارای اشکال است
این مرجع تقلید اظهارکردند: متأسفانه برخی با یک روایت در صحیح بخاری چنین حکمی صادر کردند که باید گفت که مگر این کتاب قرآن است که به آن صحیح می‌گویید؟ این کتاب نیز با اشکالاتی حتما همراه بوده و قرار نیست انسان عقل خود را نیز کنار بگذارد و بگوید یک فرد با سابقه حمایت خالصانه 42ساله از پیامبر(ص) با بی دینی از دنیا رفته و این همه اشعار ایشان در خصوص پیامبر(ص) را ندیده بگیرد.
Sahih Bukhari has a bug
They said: Unfortunately, some people with a narration in Sahih Bukhari issued such a verdict that it should be said that this is the book of the Qur'an that you are correct about? This book also has some drawbacks and it is not forbidden to leave the human mind and say that a person with a record of 42 years of pure protection from the Prophet (PBUH) has died with an unbeliever and all his poems about the Prophet (pbuh) Not seen


http://www.therebel.media/who_was_there_and_what_they_said_at_al_quds_day_in_toronto
13 July 2015: The Canadian Shiite cleric of Al-Mahdi Centre, Syed Asad Jafri, portrayed Zionism as the cause of all evils in the world.

http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/274582/2006 
14 July 2015:
  قرآن کریم با اشاره به آیه «اشِداءَ عَلَی الکُفار رُحَماءَ بَینَهُم» می فرماید مسلمانان واقعی با خود مهربان و با دشمنان خویش نامهربان و سختگیر و بد هستند.
 "The Holy Quran, referring to the verse" Allah Al-Qa'far Rahma Binem, "says that the true Muslims are self-loving and disobedient to their enemies. Hard and bad.
حجت الاسلام صرفی پور تصریح کرد: انسان ها یا مؤمن هستند و یا کافر و خداوند به مؤمنان پاداش های عظیم وعده داده است، همواره از مؤمنان و مظلومان دفاع و محافظت می کند.

Hojjatoleslam Mari Pour stated: "Human beings are either believers or unbelievers, and God has promised believers great rewards, he always protects and protects the believers and the oppressed."
وی با اشاره به آیاتی از قرآن کریم اظهار داشت: خداوند و ملائکه بر مؤمنان درود و سلام می فرستند، چرا که عزت برای مؤمنان است، کفار دشمن خداوند هستند و آن ها اهل جهنم هستند و از نور به تاریکی وارد می شوند.
Referring to the verses of the Holy Quran, he stated: "Allah and the angels will salute the believers, because their dignity is for the believers, the infidels are the enemy of Allah and they are from hell and come from light to darkness.
مدیر  حوزه علمیه امام خمینی(ره) بیان داشت: قرآن مردم را به دو دسته تقسیم کرده است آن هایی که مسلمان هستند و همواره مورد رحمت پروردگار هستند و آنهایی که کافرند و وظیفه ما این است که باید با افراد مسلمان مهربانی، مدارا و برادری کنیم.
The director of Imam Khomeini's seminary stated: "The Qur'an divides the people into two categories: those who are Muslims and who are always merciful to the Lord and those who are infidels, and our duty is to deal with Muslim people kindness, tolerance and fraternity do.

وی با اشاره به آیات قرآن ابراز کرد: در بسیاری از آیات قرآن به روش برخورد خوب و شایسته با مسلمانان توصیه شده است و آمده است نسبت به هم خشمتان را کنترل کرده و به یکدیگر نیکی کنید.

Referring to the verses of the Qur'an, he stated: "In many verses of the Qur'an, it is recommended to treat the good and proper people with the Muslims and come to control each other and give good to each other."
حجت الاسلام صرفی پور با بیان اینکه دسته دوم از انسان ها کفار و مشرکان هستند، گفت: دسته دوم مشرکان هستند و تأکید شده که با آن ها به شدت برخورد شود، از دوستی با آن‌ها نهی شود، خداوند در قرآن می فرماید؛ افراد با ایمان نباید غیر از مؤمنان، کافران را دوست و سرپرست خود انتخاب کنند و هر کس چنین کند، در هیچ چیزی از خدا نیست و رابطه او به طور کلی از خداوند گسسته است، این آیه در واقع درس سیاسی و اجتماعی به مسلمانان می دهد و آن ها را از ارتباط با کفار چه به عنوان دوست و چه به عنوان حامی و یاور بر حذر می دارد.

Hojatoleslam Mari-Pour, arguing that the second group of human beings is infidels and polytheists, said: the second group is polytheists, and it is stressed that they will be dealt with severely, they will be forbidden to be friends with them; God says in the Quran; Faith should not only choose believers and disbelievers as believers and guardians, and whoever does so is in no case from God and his relationship is generally disconnected from God, this verse actually gives Muslims a political and social lesson and It prevents them from communicating with the infidels either as a friend or as a supporter.


مدیر حوزه علمیه امام خمینی(ره) با اشاره به سخنان استاد علامه طباطبایی افزود: در تبیین نهی از قبول دوستی و ولایت کفار دو صفت کفر و ایمان به واسطه تضاد و ناسازگاری کلی که با هم دارند سبب می شود صف مؤمنان از کافران در اخلاق، معارف و سایر شئون زندگی جدا شود با این وضعیت چگونه می شود که ایمان و ولایت با کفار سازش پیدا کند.

Referring to the words of Professor Allamah Tabatabai, the director of the seminary of Imam Khomeini (RA), added: In explaining the refusal to accept the friendship and the infidels, two attributes of disbelief and faith, due to the general contradiction and incompatibility that they bring together, make the line of the believers from the disbelievers in morality , Education, and other aspects of life. How can the faith and authority of the infidel be compromised?
وی در ادامه خاطر نشان کرد: روشن است که اگر نزد مؤمنی جانب دوستی با کفار تقویت شود و او برادران ایمانی خود را وانهاده و تنها و از صمیم قلب با کفار محبت و پیوند پیدا کند در این صورت آن دوستی تأثیر می‌کند و در ابتدا خاصیت و اثر ایمان و سپس اصل ایمان را از بین می برد، از این رو خداوند فرموده است که افرادی که با دشمنان من، پیوند دوستی و همکاری برقرار کنند از حزب الهی خارج هستند و در هیچ یک از احوال و آثار دینی استقرار نخواهند یافت، البته از این حکم کسانی که از روی تقیه و برای حفظ جان خود نسبت به کفار ابراز دوستی می کنند استثنا شده اند.

He added: "It is clear that if the believer is strengthened by the friendship with the infidels and that he will be the brothers of his faith and will only love and wholeheartedly support the infidels, then this friendship will be affected and at first the property And eliminates the effect of faith and then the principle of faith. Therefore, God has stated that those who interact with my enemies will be outside the Divine Party and will not find their place in any of the religious affairs. Of course, those who have expressed their friendship with the Taqiyah and to protect their lives against the infidels are exceptions.

حجت الاسلام صرفی پور عنوان داشت: اتخاذ ولایت کفار، یک نحو خروج از لباس بندگی و داخل شدن در حزب دشمنان خدا برای فاسد کردن دین است و حتی ضرر این طغیان و فساد برای دین بیشتر از کفر کافران و شرک مشرکان است به همین دلیل آیه «یحذرکم الله نفسه» بیانگر آن است که «اتخاذ ولایت کفار» از مصادیق طغیان بر خدا و باطل کردن دین او است.

Hojatoleslam Muri Pour stated: "The adoption of the infidels is a departure from the dress of slavery and entering the party of the enemies of God to corrupt the religion, and even the loss of this upheaval and corruption for religion is greater than the disbelief of the disbelievers and the polytheistic shrine. Therefore, the verse "Ya'zurkum Allah Self" indicates that "the adoption of the infidels" is an example of a flood of God and the abrogation of his religion.


وی در پایان ابراز کرد: اسلام ناب محمدی فقط چهره رحمانی ندارد، بلکه نسبت به مؤمنان رحمان و نسبت به دشمنان اسلام اعم از کفار و مستکبران چهره سخت و برخورد شدید و بیزاری از آن ها را دارد، اسلام ناب محمدی نمی گوید با استکبار خوب باشید، بلکه می گوید از آن ها بیزار باشید و با آن ها دوستی نکرده و مراقب توطئه های آن باشید.

He stated at the end: pure Mohammadi Islam is not only a Rahmani's face, but rather to the faithful believers and to the enemies of Islam, including the infidels and the mustahabs, they have a hard face and antagonism to them, the pure Islam does not say that Mohammadi is said to be with good arrogance Be, but rather tell them to hate them and not be friends with them and take care of their conspiracies.

http://en.abna24.com/service/middle-east-west-asia/archive/2015/09/14/710662/story.html
14 Sep 2015: "Hujjat al-Islam Ali al-Kourani, a Lebanese scholar and researcher in the field of Mahdism, referred to the recent remarks made by the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, wherein he stated that Israel “will not exist in 25 years’ time,” and said that since Muslims in Arab countries agree that the Zionist regime is their enemy, thus they must fight and so work toward destroying this regime.
His Eminence explained that the destruction of the Zionist regime will occur in two phases, and in regard to the first phase, he quoted verse 17:5 from the Holy Quran, explaining that Israel will be eventually punished for their actions.
He also mentioned an authentic hadith from Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq which states that “They are those who will be resurrected by God before the rise of [Imam Muhammad al-Mahdi] to fight Israel” and said: “Our youths’ resistance against the Zionist regime and the Islamic Resistance [Hezbollah] are proof for this.”
“Imam al-Mahdi and his companions will enter al-Aqsa Mosque and later they will re-enter it, just as they entered it the first time,” he explained.
Hujjat al-Islam al-Kourani stressed that the predication made by Ayatollah Khamenei that Israel will be destroyed is based on Quranic verses and authentic narrations and stressed that this will be achieved in the near future.
“God willing, we will see this day,” he added."


http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/5486.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/5486.htm
13 Oct 2015: Iraqi Shiite cleric Sabah Shabr discussed the spread of Islam in a series of lectures about Jihad. Sabah confirmed that most Islamic countries were conquered by force. He said that Muslims should not try to appease the Jews and Christians by denying this and that the "true religion of Allah should be spread by the sword." Sheikh Shabr added that when Muslims conquer the country of infidels, they should give the locals the opportunity to convert to Islam or kill them. If the locals are from among the People of the Book, i.e., Jews or Christians, they should have the third option of paying the jizya poll tax. The entire series of lectures was posted on October 13, 2015 on a YouTube account, dedicated to the thinking of Ayatollah Sistani.


http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/3523/-100
http://en.abna24.com/service/grand-ayatollahs/archive/2015/11/02/718116/story.html
31 Oct 2015: "Ayatollah Nouri-Hamadani ....said that identifying the enemies and their plans is another key principle of Islam, and added that the Quran introduces three groups as the main enemies of the Islamic nation – the infidels, the hypocrites and the Jews. The Quran also calls on Muslims not to neglect these three groups and to never become dominated by them.
“Thus, we must be very vigilant, especially in today’s world where the words of the US and Israel are loudly heard and the voices of those killed Yemen, Palestine, Iraq and Syria are not,” he said."


http://www.egyptindependent.com//news/iraq-s-shi-ite-leader-al-sadr-invites-al-azhar-unity-against-jews
11 Nov 2015: Muqtada Al-Sadr, one of Iraq’s influential Shi'ite leaders, has invited Egypt’s Al-Azhar, the top religious academy in the Sunni Islamic World, to make Jews their common enemy and to set doctrinal differences aside.
“Let’s have a common enemy: jews and their extremist subordinates. Let’s put our hands together,” he said in a message published in Arabic by his official website Sunday.
http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/195813-shiite-killings-nigerian-christian-leaders-condemn-iranian-analyst-for-dangerous-statement.html
27 Dec 2015: "In a statement signed by its chairman, Solomon Asemota, the forum described the allegation by an analyst on Iran’s Press TV as sheer absurdity aimed at igniting a conflict between Christians and Shiite Muslims in Nigeria.
“The National Christian Elders Forum wishes to refute publicly and stridently that there is no iota of truth in a video report credited to an Iranian television station in which an Iranian lecturer posited that a “triangle of evil” composing of the Nigerian Army, Boko Haram, and Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) have combined to destroy Shiites in Nigeria!”


http://almon.co/2kzl 
2016:  Mashhad al-Shams, a pagan shrine converted in a Shia shrine. the tomb of the Prophet Ezekiel (Zul-Kifl) in southern Babil was originally a Jewish monument but is now classified as a Shiite mosque.
 


http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/01/iraq-religious-minority-mandean.html#ixzz4GLItBixV
Jan 2016: Mandaeans complain of a discriminatory preferential treatment regarding the construction of places of worship. While it is easy for Muslims to build a mosque or a Shiite shrine, constructing a mandi requires cumbersome administrative measures and prior approvals.
...While it is permissible for Muslim endowments by the Ministry of Planning to invest their lands in projects, such as using them as parking spaces, building hotels, playgrounds and other projects, Mandaeans are not allowed to construct guest houses or religious schools or even residence complexes for their clergy. The Mandaeans are even not allowed to invest in projects of public interest, such as the construction of a hospital, for example.

http://isgap.org/flashpoint/antisemitic-incitement-is-still-alive-in-iran
6 Jan 2016: On April 10, the Iranian hardliner website Mashregh News affiliated with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards published an article entitled “Who Are Human History’s Most Bloodthirsty People?” The article was later republished by other websites, including Alef, which is associated with Ahmad Tavakoli, a conservative member of Iranian Parliament (Majlis), former head of its research center, and a relative of Iran’s Majlis Speaker Ali Larijani and the Head of the Judiciary Sadegh Amoli Larijani. The article, which included quotes and pictures from classic blood libels, accused Jews of killing non-Jews and using their blood for ritualistic purposes. It claimed that Israeli policy in the Palestinian territories was proof of the rapacious and savage nature of the Jewish people and cited antisemitic literature as further evidence of crimes allegedly committed by Jews throughout history.
....
On 30 August 2014, Mashregh News published an article entitled “Why do we call the Holocaust a myth?” The website claimed that the Holocaust has turned into a lucrative industry for the Jews, serving their economic interests and justifying the allocation of financial resources and significant economic benefits to Zionist Jews. It also serves the Zionists’ international and diplomatic interests and is used by the Jews to justify their crimes against the Palestinians. The article then argued that nearly 200 different researchers have found no evidence for the final solution or the genocide of the Jewish people. “It can be firmly said…that the Holocaust is no more than a false myth”, the article concluded.[5]
Antisemitic propaganda also includes theological articles inciting against Jews, such as an essay published by Tasnim News, affiliated with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, discussing the connection between the Day of Judgment in Shi’ite tradition and the “divine promise to exterminate the Jews”.[6]
Iranian clerics seem to disregard the official distinction between Zionists and Jews, as well. In November 2013, a leader of Friday prayers in the city of Sanandaj in the Kurdistan province referred to the Jews as the “biggest enemies of Islam”. He went on to say that “their crimes at the present time” are a repetition of the Battle of Karbala in 680 AD where Imam Hussein ibn Ali and his followers were massacred.[7]
.....
Isolated attacks against Iranian Jews in recent years have proved the vulnerability of the Jewish minority in the Islamic Republic. In November 2012 a Jewish woman in Isfahan was murdered by her neighbors who wanted to take over her home. A month later, a 24-year-old Iranian Jew, the son of a well-known wealthy businessman, was reportedly murdered for dating a Muslim girl whose father was a member of the Revolutionary Guards.


http://en.cijnews.com/?p=19529
http://en.cijnews.com/?p=18641
7 January 2016: One of the speakers was the Shiite cleric, Syed Hassan Mujtaba Rizvi, Pakistani born who grew up in Canada. In his passionate speech, Hassan Mujtaba Rizvi emphasized that the Shiites are not afraid of death, rather they wish to die and gain martyrdom in the path of Allah and for the cause of Islam.
........
Hassan Mujtaba Rizvi discussed in one his sermons held in Houston, Texas (January 30, 2011) the question of loyalty (“affiliation” in his terminology) of Shiite Muslim believers to their country of residence and the relations between religious belief and citizenship.
Here is an excerpt of Hassan Mujtaba Rizvi’s sermon:
“My affiliations are with Iran, because my affiliation with Canada would mean that if in Canada there was something for me to affiliate by, that was given to me by Allah, I should have affiliation with Canada.
“But when I look towards Allah, and I see that He has affiliation with Iran, has no affiliation with Canada with America, I say: I have affiliation with Iran.
“Do I have an affiliation with the country that I was born in? No. Why Should I have affiliation with the country that I was born in? That’s a very shallow way to look at it. Like, I was born in Pakistan, so I start having affiliations because I was born there.



https://cafedissensus.com/2016/01/07/a-tale-of-two-brothers-history-of-estrangement-and-the-birth-of-two-religions/
7 January 2016: In an interview to this scribe, the leader of the liberation movement of this Masonic Temple Kalbe Jawad firmly reiterated that the Freemasons are Jews. Relying heavily of the Zionist conspiracy theory against Islam he said, “Freemason is a Jewish organization. However, it also has some Christians as its members. Unfortunately, some opportunists among Muslims are also a part of this movement that is a conspiracy against Islam.” To him the freemasons are the worshippers of Satan. He goes on to tell me, “You should read the Jewish book Talmud. It is a very dangerous book. I call it dangerous because it states that only Jews have the right to live. If given a choice between saving a non-Jewish human life and a life of the dog, the Jew should save the dog. This is the kind of religious instruction given to Jews in their book. Now you can understand yourself.” Belonging to the revisionist school that is critical of the glorious days of Jews under Muslim rulers, Jawad categorically states, “There are old roots to this enmity. Our first Imam, Hazrat Ali, the son-in-law of Prophet Muhammad, led a war against the Jews in the year 629 in Khyber.”
.....
For Jawad and other Shia Muslims living in Lucknow, the Masonic Temple belongs to the Jews and is part of the Zionist conspiracy. One Zaidi (name changed) said, “Why do these Freemasons work in secrecy? If there is nothing controversial about them, then why don’t they open their Lodge for the public? Jews have always worked secretly against Islam. They conspire with their Christian partners in their war against Islam that is seen in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict.”




http://mohabatnews.com/en/?p=2783
22 January 2016: Yonathan Betkolia, a member of the Iranian Islamic Parliament representing Assyrians and Chaldeans, protested the limitations imposed on religious minorities under the Islamic regime of Iran. He mentioned how an Islamic group seized a piece of land belonging to an Assyrian-Chaldean Catholic church in order to build a mosque there.
Mr. Betkolia spoke with Sharq newspaper regarding the matter and said, “It is two years since an Islamic group illegally seized a piece of land that rightfully belongs to an Assyrian-Chaldean Catholic church in order to build a Hussainia (a house of mourning for the third Shi’ite Imam). There has been persistent efforts and investigations by officials to get the land back with no success. The land-grabbers claim to be devout religious people.”
He added that he has discussed the issue with Ali Younesi, President Rouhani’s special assistant in religious minorities’ affairs. However, Younesi turned him down by saying there’s nothing he can do about the issue.
Mr. Betkolia did not mention any details about the Islamic group that grabbed the land, but he did mention that there are discriminatory laws in the country against Christians and other religious minorities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Doi0swhmMRc
http://www.iranian-americans.com/blatant-anti-semitism-new-wave-of-anti-jewish-hatred-by-iranian-regime/
22 Feb 2016: The Iranian regime has started a widespread campaign to portray the Saudi royal family as Jewish and at the same time, calling Jews filthy anti-Islamic conspirators responsible for all the Middle Eastern crisis and blood shedding. This campaign is well illustrated in a speech by [Alireza] Panahian, the most renowned preacher close to the Supreme Leader and tied to revolutionary guards during a state organized rally in defense of Yemeni rebels. He declared: “For the last hundred years, the Jews in the region have been committing atrocities and killing Muslims. We blame anti-Islam Jews and Zionists for the plight of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Bahrain, and Yemen.


http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/431823/84
11 June 2016:
اعمال نیک کفار در روز قیامت مانند خاکستر در باد است
good deeds of the infidels on the resurrection day are like ashes in the wind

آیت‌الله سیدجعفر سیدان، استاد دروس سطح عالی حوزه علمیه خراسان در تفسیر آیه قرآن کریم گفت: اعمال افرادی که به خدا کافر شده‌اند، هر چند اعمال خوبی مانند اطعام و انفاق هم داشته باشند در روز قیامت مانند خاکستری است که در باد تندی قرار دارد و از بین می‌رود.
The good deeds of the infidels on the resurrection day are like ashes in the windAyatollah Seyyed Ja'far Sidan, professor of high-level courses in the Khorasan seminary, explained in the commentary of Quranic verse: "Acts of those who disbelieved in Allah, though they have good deeds like food and charity, on the Day of Resurrection, such as the gray that is in a strong wind, and Disappears.



https://www.iranhumanrights.org/2016/06/yarsan/
17 June 2016: The Yarsan spokesman pointed out that some Shia theologians and grand ayatollahs had issued fatwas (religious decrees) that described followers of the Yarsan faith as “infidels” and “apostates.”



https://twitter.com/SHiaNews_ALerTs/status/748881754375630850
1 July 2016:
کراچی: میرا سلام ہو سید حسن نصر اللہ پر جس نے چودہ سو سال بعد یہودیوں کو خیبر یاد دلادیا، علامہ احمد اقبال رضوی

http://ur.shabestan.ir/detail/News/63881
2 Jul 2016:
خبررساں ایجنسی شبستان شعبہ مشہد نے حوزہ علمیہ خراسان کی سائٹ کے حوالے سے نقل کیا ہے کہ حوزہ علمیہ کے استاد آیت اللہ حسین گرایلی نےمسئلہ فلسطین کے مقابلے میں اسلامی جمہوریہ ایران کے سخت موقف کے سبب کی وضاحت کرتے ہوئے کہا ہے کہ قرآن کریم میں اس مسئلے کا راز بیان کیا گیا ہے کہ جو فرماتا ہے«وَ لَن تَرضىٰ عَنكَ اليَهودُ وَ لَا النَّصارىٰ حَتّىٰ تَتَّبِعَ مِلَّتَهُم...» (بقره/۱۲۰)یہود و نصاریٰ چاہتے ہیں کہ مسلمان اپنے مکتب اوردین سے ہاتھ کھینچ لیں اورہرگز اس سے کم پرراضی نہیں ہوتے۔
انہوں نےمظلوموں کے دفاع اورظالموں کا مقابلہ کرنے میں قرآن کریم کی آیات،اہل بیت علیہم السلام کی سیرت کو مسئلہ قدس پراسلامی جمہوریہ ایران کے نظام،امام خمینی،قائد انقلاب اسلامی اوردیگر علمائے کرام کے اصرارکی دلیل  قراردیا ہے۔
آیت اللہ گرایلی نے سورہ مبارکہ بقرہ کی آیت نمبر١۲۰«...وَ لَئِنِ اتَّبَعتَ أَهواءَهُم بَعدَ الَّذي جاءَكَ مِنَ العِلمِ ما لَكَ مِنَ اللَّهِ مِن وَلِيٍّ وَ لا نَصيرٍ» کی طرف اشارہ کرتے ہوئے کہا ہےکہ ہم دشمنوں کے افکار اوراعتقادات کی طرف رجحان رکھتے ہوں تو ہم الہی نصرت اورحمایت کو کھو بیٹھیں گے۔
انہوں نے آیہ شریفہ«إِنَّا لَنَنصُرُ رُسُلَنَا وَ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا فِي الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَ يَوْمَ يَقُومُ الْأَشْهَادُ» (غافر/۵۱) کی طرف اشارہ کرتے ہوئے کہا ہےکہ عالمی استعمار کی تباہی کی کوششوں اورمردہ باد آمریکہ کی فریاد کو نصرت الہی کے حصول کی  شرط قراردیا ہے۔
حوزہ علمیہ خراسان کے استاد نےسورہ مائدہ کی آیت نمبر۵١«يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا تَتَّخِذُوا الْيَهُودَ وَ النَّصَارَىٰ أَوْلِيَاءَ بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلِيَاءُ بَعْضٍ...» کو اسلام کے دشمنوں کا مقابلہ کرنے کے بارے میں قرآن کریم کی ایک اوروضاحت پیش کرتے ہوئے کہا ہے کہ اگرکوئی یہودونصاریٰ کا حامی ہو تو وہ انہیں میں سے ہوگا۔



http://taghribnews.com/vdce7v8wpjh8xpi.1kbj.html
http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/422536/1
17 July 2016: Speaking during his class on Quranic exegesis at Qom’s Ayatollah Golpaygani Seminary, Ayatollah Mahdi Hadavi-Tehrani stated that emigration to non-Islamic countries for any purpose other than the propagation of Islam is incorrect.
..... 
His Eminence continued, saying that today those who migrate to non-Muslim countries are of two types – some of them emigrate to promote and propagate Islam. This is recommended in Islam. “Some people both emigrate to non-Muslim countries for business opportunities and specific reasons. This only strengthens the disbelievers and is not permissible from an Islamic perspective,” he said.


 July 2016: 

The group of Lebanese [Shia and Sunni] scholars added that although they respect Erdoğan’s Islamic and domestic economic achievements, the duty of an Islamic state is to prepare Islamic nations to fight the Zionists and to support the Islamic Resistance in various ways and to support anti-imperialist policies.



http://en.rasanews.ir/detail/News/422689/5
14 Aug 2016:
Hujjat al-Islam Hoseyni-Khorasani said that the enemies’ inner desire has always been that Muslims remain backward and preoccupied with problems so that they can implement their plots against them, and added: “There are numerous verses in the Quran which say that Muslims must have certainty because in all circumstances and at any price, the unbelievers will never be satisfied with them.”

The member of the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom said the top-level officials and decision-makers in Iran’s government must realize that the US and the American minds cannot reach a mutual understanding with Iran under any circumstances or at any price.

His Eminence added that the meaning of the sentence isn’t that we won’t negotiate or have a relationship with them but rather it means that we know that the unbelievers are the obstinate enemies and opponents of true and pure Islam and the US, Israel and the UK will never be satisfied with Muslims.  http://hawzahnews.com/detail/News/391944  24 Aug 2016:مقصود از پليدى كافر چيست؟ What is the meaning of impurity of infidel?
از آثار و نحوه كردار هر كسى مى توان به ملكات و صفات درونى او پى برد: شما دزدان مسلّح و غارتگر را «آلوده و نجس» مى خوانيد؛ زيرا تا روان شخص، آلوده و دستخوش بى رحمى نباشد، هيچ گاه دست به اين چنين كارهاى ضد انسانى نمى زند.
From the works and the way in which everyone can act, one can achieve his inner qualities and qualities: you call the armed robbers and the looters "polluted and unclean", because they are never infected and merciless to the person's psychology, never do it. Does not do anti-human activities. 
روى اين مقياس، مشرك پليد است؛ به يقين كسانى كه جلو نشر دعوت پيامبران و آموزگاران الهى را مى گيرند و نمى گذارند آن رادمردان الهى، جامعه را از انحطاط اخلاقى و فساد اجتماعى برهانند و انسان را، كه گل سرسبد موجودات است، از سنگ و چوب پرستى، از زنا و فحشا و... نجات دهند، پليدند.  On this scale, the idol is a godfearing polytheist. Certainly, those who receive the divine prophets and teachers' invitation and do not let the divine ones remove the society from moral degradation and social corruption, and the human being, the flagship of the beings, And wickedness, adultery, prostitution, and so on, are filthy.
برنامه پيامبر اسلام (ص) روشن بود و همه مى دانستند كه پيامبر اسلام (ص)، مانند پيامبران ديگر مى خواهد يك سلسله ارزش هاى اخلاقى را در اجتماع نشر دهد. با وجود اين، مشركان بزرگ ترين مانع بر سر راه نفوذ اسلام بودند و هرگز حاضر نبودند يك گام با رسول خدا (ص) بردارند، بلكه پيوسته با او به نبرد برخاسته مقدمات كشتن او را آماده مى كردند و پيمان هاى خود را با حضرت مى شكستند، در اين صورت اين افراد ناپاك بودند.


The Prophet's program (PBUH) was clear and everyone knew that the Prophet (PBUH), like other prophets, wanted to publish a series of moral values ​​in the community. Nevertheless, the polytheists were the biggest obstacle to the influence of Islam and never refused to take a step with the Prophet (pbuh), but he constantly started fighting with him to prepare the preparations for his killing and make his alliances with the Prophet They were defeated in this case.
* چرا كافر شرعاً نجس است؟
* Why is the disbeliever unclean? baHBJHBM
ثانياً؛ هرگاه مسلمان با كافر مانند برادران دينى خود معاشرت داشته باشد در اين صورت به حكم قانونِ «محاكات و همرنگى» به رنگ آنان درمى آيد و احكام خدا در نظر آنان بى ارزش جلوه مى كند. هرگاه مسلمانان با گروه كافر، به طور آزاد و به سان برادران دينى نشست و برخاست كنند، نتيجه اين آميزش اين مى شود كه رفتار و كردار گروه كافر در روحيه مسلمانان اثر بگذارد و به سان آنان، از شراب و قمار و ديگر محرّمات اسلام اجتناب نورزند.
Secondly, if a Muslim with a disbeliever associates with his religious brothers, then they will be punished according to the law of "trials and coherence", and the judgments of God will be in vain to them. When Muslims are with the infidel group, and freely sitting and standing (socializing) with them as they do with their fellow religionists, the result of this association is that the behavior of the infidel group will affect the Muslims' morals, and they will not avoid wine and gambling and other prohibitions of Islam as they do.
جاى گفتگو نيست كه تأثير رفتار 0XNZو كردار يك فرد خارجى كه برنامه زندگى او مطابق درخواست هاى نفسانى و غرايز انسانى است، سريع تر و نافذتر است؛ زيرا در زندگى اوHKWEQQQO`I ه معاشرت آزاد مسلمانان با گروه كافر چه آثار منفى و بدى در روحيه مسلمانان نهاده است.
It is not a matter of dialogue that the effect of the behavior of an outsider person whose schedule of life is in accordance with human requests and human instincts is faster and more penetrating, because in his life, the mixing of woman and man, dance, wine, gambling, some acts that violate chastity, is unmistakable and, of course, the effect of these factors is faster than the effect of Muslim behavior on the disbeliever. Of course, we do not deny that sometimes the socialization of a Muslim may affect those who disbelieve, and the effect of these kinds of societies is far less than the effect of the unbeliever's communion with Muslims. We see that today, the free association of Muslims with the infidel group has had a negative and bad effect on the morals of Muslims.
* سه قراردادی که اندلس (اسپانیا) را از اسلام جدا کرد

هنوز حادثۀ جانگداز اندلس از صفحه خاطرها فراموش نشده است. استقلال اندلس بر اثر سه قرارداد زير با مسيحيان، در خطر افتاد و از بين رفت كه آن سه قرارداد عبارت بود از:

 * آزادى دين؛

* آزادى تجارت؛

* آزادى تعليمات.* Three contractors who separated Andalusia (Spain) from Islam

The unlucky event of Andalusia has not been forgotten. Independence of Andalusia was compromised by the following three contracts with the Christians, and the three contracts were:

 * Freedom of religion;

* Freedom of Trade;

* Freedom of Education.



* آنان به خوبى آگاه بودند كه با به دست آوردن امتياز اوّل مى توانند راه را براى كشيشان باز كنند و جهادى كه سرچشمه آن، علاقه به دين است، از بين ببرند.
* They were well aware that by gaining the first point they could open the path for their priests and eliminate the jihad that originated from it, the interest in religion.* رابطه بازرگانى نيز بهترين وسيله براى اختلاط و آميزش است و به واسطه آميزش آنان با مسلمان ها، سرانجام مسلمانان استقامت خود را در راه حفظ شعاير ملى و دينى از دست مى دهند.

* Commercial relationship is also the best way to mix and mix, and, by joining them with Muslims, Muslims eventually lose their stamina in order to preserve national and religious rituals.

* آزادى تعليمات نكته مهم ترى داشت؛ زيرا وقتى فرزندان مسلمانان زير دست آموزگاران مسيحى تربيت يافتند قطعاً حسّ خضوع در شاگرد سبب مى گردد كه تمام سخنان او را دربست بپذيرد، هر چند با اصول اسلام سازگار نباشد.

* Freedom of education was a more important point, because when the children of Muslims were brought under the control of Christian teachers, the sense of humility in the student would cause him to accept all his words, although not compatible with the principles of Islam.
مسيحيان، بر اثر آميزش با مسلمانان اندلسى، توانستند مُسكرات را ميانشان رواج داده و آنان را به ميخوارگى و ميگسارى عادت دهند و كم كم بر اثر هوسرانى و آلوده شدن به گناهان، عزّت نفس و غرور ملّى را از دست دادند.
Christians, through intercourse with the Muslims of Andalusia, were able to propagate the mischief amongst them, and to accustom them to drinking and drinking and eventually losing their self-esteem and national pride through swearing and infecting sins.
يكى از اقدامات مسيحيان در اندلس اين بود كه دنار رودخانه قرطبه، باغى در ميان مزارع ترتيب دادند و عمارت زيبايى در آن جا برپا كردند كه گردشگاه جوانان باشد تا علاوه بر گردش، از ديدن دختران مسيحى نيز بهره مند گردند.بدين ترتيب نيروى ايمان و غرور ملّى مسلمانان اين كشور كه تا آن زمان همه جا موجب و مايۀ پيشرفت و پيروزى آنان در جنگ با مسيحيان بود، تدريجاً بر اثر ميگسارى و تسلّط آموزگاران، به خضوع و فروتنى در برابر دشمن مبدّل گرديد. پايتخت اندلس و ساير شهرستان ها جولانگاه بيگانگان شد. خلط و آميزش و آزادى تجارت، نفوذ اقتصادى آنها را مسلّم كرد و مقدمات نفوذ سياسى پى ريزى شد و سرانجام اين كشور پهناور اسلامى بر اثر همين ارتباط ها و آميزش ها، در اواخر قرن نهم اسلامى به كلّى سقوط كرد.بى جهت نيست كه بنيانگذار اسلام ميان مسلمانان و كافران حصارى كشيده و آنان را از اختلاط هاى فوق العاده باز داشته است، تا آن جا كه آنان را روى سياست اسلامى «نجس» و لازم الاجتناب خوانده است.از اين بيان روشن مى گردد كه كافر به سان الكل، نجس است؛ منتها نجاست كافر، سياسى است تا به جهت نجاست، ارتباط مسلمانان با اين دو موجود پليد، قطع گردد و ايمان و پاكى آنان بر اثر عدم آميزش، دست نخورده بماند؛ به عبارت ديگر هدف از نجس شمردن كافر و الكل، يك نوع مبارزه منفى بر ضدّ كفر و الكليسم است، تا از اين طريق، اين دو نوع پليدى از جامعه مسلمانان رخت بربندد و محيط اسلامى از آنها پاك گردد. One of the steps Christians in Andalusia took was that The Cordoba River arranged a garden in the fields and built a beautiful mansion there that would be a youth walk in order to benefit from the visitation of Christian girls in addition to the circulation (walk). According to the power of the faith and national pride of the Muslims of this country that until then Everywhere they made their progress and triumph in the war with the Christians, they gradually became humble and humble before the enemy as a result of the mastery of the teachers. The capital of Andalusia and other cities was the alleyway. Confusion and trade liberalization recognized their economic influence, and the preconditions for political influence were discovered and eventually this vast Islamic state collapsed at the end of the 9th century as a result of these ties and relations. That is why the founder Islam erected a fence between the Muslims and the disbelievers and prevented them from extraordinary confusion, insofar as that they are "impure" to the Islamic policy
It is clear from this statement that the disbeliever is unclean in the sense of Allah; It is clear from this statement that the disbelievers are unclean, unclean ; The very thing, impurity of infidel, is political, is a non-sense. the connection of the Muslims to these two evil creatures is disconnected and their faith and their purity remain unaffected by the lack of association. In other words, the purpose of avoiding the disbelievers and the alcohol is to be a kind of negative struggle against disbelief and alcoholism, in order to eradicate these two kinds of evil from the Muslim community and eliminate them from the Muslim world.
https://www.rabwah.net/iran-opposes-appointment-of-qadiani-asma-jahangir-as-un-rapporteur-on-human-rights/21 Sep 2016:Iran opposes appointment of ‘Qadiani’ Asma Jahangir as UN Rapporteur on Human Rights

http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/452530/19
29 Sep 2016:
حجت الاسلام فاطمیان کارشناس رادیو معارف
Hojat ul-Islam Fatmian: Expert Radio Education
نتیجه دنیوی گناهِ ارتباط با مشرکان و مستکبران نازل نشدن باران است
کارشناس رادیو معارف با بیان اینکه نتیجه دنیوی گناه ارتباط با مشرکان و مستکبران عدم نزول باران به عنوان رحمت الهی است، گفت: هرکس که در راه حق استقامت کرده و ارتباط خود را با مشرک و مستکبر قطع کند خداوند ر قرآن به او وعده آب فراوان و نزول باران داده است.
The worldly result of sin of the relations/mixing with the polytheists and the arrogant ones is that one is deprived of the rain
The expert of Radio Ma'arev, saying that the worldly result of sin is the connection with the polytheists and the arrogant one is of rain, a form of divine mercy, stops falling. He said: "Everyone who stands in the right path and disconnects his relationship with the polytheistic and arrogant, God gives him the promise in Quran of abundant water in and rain falls.
کارشناس رادیو معارف با تأکید بر اینکه مسلمانان با این وعده الهی ارتباط خود را با مشرکان قطع کردند، ادامه داد: پس از این اتفاق خداوند به وسیله باران مکه را آباد کرد و راه سرزمین شام و یمن را به روی مسلمانان گشود و به این ترتیب رزق و روزی آن‌ها از این راه تأمین شد.
Radio Education expert emphasized that Muslims with this divine promise interrupted their relationship with the idolaters, said, "After this, God raised the rain of Mecca and opened the way to the land of Syria and Yemen to Muslims, and thus Their day and day were provided by this way.
حجت الاسلام فاطمیان با تأکید بر اینکه اگر ما هم در راه درستی که انتخاب کرده ایم استقامت ورزیده و حاضر به ارتباط با مشرکان نبوده و برای دفاع از ارزش‌های خود مشکلات را تحمل کنیم قطعاً خداوند درهای رزق و روزی را به روی ما به وسیله نزول باران و آب فراوان خواهد گشود.
Hujjat al-Islam Fatimian emphasized that if we persevere in the right path that we have chosen and are not willing to communicate with the polytheists, and to endure our problems in order to defend our values, surely God will bring us the doors to us by the fall of rain And plenty of water will open.

وی با اشاره به اینکه عده‌ای تصور می‌کنند که با ارتباط با بیگانه و مشرکان مشکلات کشور حل می شود، گفت: راه حل مشکلات استقامت بر راه درست و صراط مستقیم است و ما نباید تصور کنیم که در صورت قطع ارتباط با مشرکان و مستکبران در رزق و معیشت خود دچار تنگنا خواهیم شد زیرا خداوند وعده داده در صورت استقامت ما را از نعمت فراوان با نزول آب و باران به عنوان سرچشمه رحمت و برکت سیراب خواهد کرد.

Referring to the fact that some people think that solving the problems of the country by contacting the foreigners and the pagans, the solution to the problems is endurance on the right path and direct path, and we should not imagine that in the event of disconnection from the polytheists and the arrogant we will suffer from poverty and livelihoodi because God has promised us that in the event of perseverance, he will drown us with a great blessing with the descent of water and rain as the source of mercy and blessing.
کارشناس رادیو معارف ادامه داد: براساس آیات قرآن کریم باید خشکسالی ها اخیر و کمبود باران را از نشانه‌های عدم استقامت در راه خدا و گناه ارتباط با ظالم بدانیم؛ زیرا حضرت رسول(ص) فرموده که کسی که با ظالم غرابت دارد این غرابت نفس به حدی روی او اثر گذار است که او هم به اندازه ظالم در ظلم به مظلوم و پایمال کردن حقوق مظلومان مقصر است بر همین اساس ما باید برای نزول باران به عنوان برکت و رحمت الهی در راه حق و دفاع از ارزش‌های اسلامی خود پایداری کرده و همچنین نباید در کنار مستکبران قرار بگیرم و به خاطر ترس از کمی رزق خود به آن‌ها در ظلم به مظلوم لبخند بزنیم.
According to the Qur'an, the recent droughts and the lack of rain should be regarded as signs of endurance in the cause of God and the sin of communicating with the tyrant, because the Prophet (pbuh) said that one who stands with oppressor is also responsible for the cruelty of oppression and the overthrow of the rights of the oppressed. Accordingly, for rain and divine mercy, we should endure our Islamic values ​​and should not be with the arrogant, and smile at them for the sake of a little fear of their abundance.



http://hawzahnews.com/detail/News/395733
6 Oct 2016:
«حوزه» ازاصفهان، حجت الاسلام والمسلمین احمد رهدار، امروز در جمع عزاداران حسینی هیئت انصارالحسین(ع) اصفهان، با طرح این سؤال که چرا یک جامعه اسلامی طرفدار پیامبر(ص) به یک باره در برابر حضرت اباعبد الله الحسین(ع) قرار گرفته و علاوه بر به شهادت رساندن ایشان و یاران‌شان، اهل بیت ایشان را به اسارت بردند؟، به نفوذ یهودیان در جامعه اسلامی در صدر اسلام که توسط یکی از خلفا مطرح شده و هدف آن تقدس زدایی از اسلام و اهل بیت عصمت و طهارت(ع) بود اشاره کرد و گفت: یکی از این افراد، «کعب الاحبار» یهودی بود که به ظاهر مسلمان شده بود.



 Hujjat al-Islam and Muslim Ahmad Rahdar today in the mosque of Hussein's Ansar al-Hussein (AS) board of Isfahan, asking why the Islamic Prophet's Prophet (PBUH) is on one side against Imam Ali (PBUH), and in addition to Taking their martyrs and their followers, they took their Ahl al-Bayt to captivity?
 The influence of the Jews in the Islamic society at the dawn of Islam, which was raised by one of the Caliphs and aimed at the sacrifice of Islam and the Ahlul Bayt of Imam and Allah (AS), said: "One of these people," Ka'b Allahbar "was a Jew It was apparently Muslim.
وی با بیان این که این جریان دو مأموریت داشت، افزود: اولین مأموریت این‌ها این بود که تمام ویژگی های منحصر بفرد و اختصاصی امیرالمؤمنین علی(علیه السلام) و اهل بیت(ع) را در ظاهر از آن ها بگیرند و برای رسیدن به این هدف، به ساختن احادیث جعلی و بدلی روی آوردند.

He stated that the two missions were ongoing, adding: "The first mission was to take all the unique features of Imam Ali (AS) and Ahlul-Bayt (AS) in their appearance, and to achieve this The goal was to make fake and illiterate hadiths.

رئیس مؤسسه مطالعات و تحقیقات اسلامی فتوح اندیشه، با بیان این که، واقعه لیلة المبیت، کساء، حدیث "أنَا مَدینَةُ العِلمِ وعَلِیٌّ بابُها"، و بسیاری از موارد دیگر از جمله افتخارات علی(علیه السلام) و خاندان پاکش بود، خاطرنشان کرد: در مقابل این واقعیات، کعب الاحبار نیز شروع به ساختن احادیث جعلی کرد تا جایی که می بینیم در کتاب صحیح بخاری، از بین 600 هزار روایتی که جمع شده است، حتی یک روایت هم از امام باقر(ع) و امام صادق(ع) وجود ندارد.

The head of the Institute for Islamic Studies and Studies, Fotouh Andisheh, said that the events of Laila al-Mubit, Kasa'ah, hadith "I am the city of knowledge and Ali is it's gate", and many other things, including Ali (PBUH) honors and his pure family, said: Against these facts, Ka'b al-Ahbar began to make fake hadiths. As you can see, in the book of Sahih Bukhari, out of a total of 600,000 narrations, even a narrative of Imam Baqir (AS) and Imam Sadeq (AS) does not exist.
 وی افزود: اما پروژه گرفتن انحصارات و ویژگی های اختصاصی امام علی(ع) و خاندانش توسط نفوذی های یهودی در جهان اسلام، با شکست مواجه شد، زیرا شرافت خط پیامبر(ص) و اهل بیت(ع) آنقدر بالا بود که با تحریف هم نتوانستند به آن خدشه ای وارد کنند.

 He added: "But the project to capture the exclusive monuments and features of Imam Ali (PBUH) and his family under Jewish influences in the Muslim world failed because the dignity of the Prophet's (PBUH) and Ahlul-Bayt (AS) line was so high that they could neither distort nor capture it.
حجت الاسلام و المسلمین رهدار در ادامه، ماموریت دوم کعب الاحبار و پیروان او را، ساختن روایات اعتقادی غیر سیاسی و همچنین روایاتی دروغین در خصوص معاد، برزخ، و آسمان ها دانست و گفت: آنان در روایات‌شان خدایی را ساختند که جسم می شود، انبیایی که خطا می کنند و یا معاد و برزخی که بسیار وحشتناک بود؛ در نتیجه سپهر اعتقادی اهل سنت، توسط کعب الاحبار یهودی بسته شد و در نهایت با به انحراف رفتن آن جامعه، کارهایی شد که نباید می‌شد.
Hojjatoleslam and Al-Moslemim Rahdar went on to convey the second mission of Ka'b al-Ahbar and his followers, creating non-political beliefs and false accusations about resurrection, rebellion, and heavens, saying: "They created a god in their traditions, which becomes a body, The Prophets who make mistakes or the resurrection and the grave that was so terrible; as a result, the Sunni beliefs were finalized by the Jewish Ahl-al-Qa'ab, and ultimately it was something that should not have been done with the diversion of that community.

رئیس موسسه فتوح اندیشه خاطرنشان کرد: در ماجرای کربلا نیز شاهد هستیم که در پشت صحنه و در دربار یزید و ابن زیاد، هم یهودیان و هم مسیحیان حضورداشتتد.

The head of the Institute of Islamic Art said: "In Karbala, we are witnessing the presence of Jews and Christians behind the scenes and at the Yazid and Ibn Qadi court.


http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/457045/74
24 Oct 2016:
هشدار قرآن در مورد فتنه گری قوم یهود/ یهود با شعار حقوق بشر به دنبال گمراه کردن مسلمانان است

نماینده ولی فقیه در آذربایجان غربی گفت: یهودیان از صدر اسلام تاکنون همواره سعی کردند با ظاهری فریبنده مردم را فریب دهند و امروز هم با شعار حقوق بشر، آزادی و پیشرفت به دنبال فریب افراد هستند که خدای متعال در مورد فتنه آنان هشدار می دهد.
Hojat-alIslam Mahdi Qureshi: Wali Faqih representative in West Azerbaijan said: "The Jews from the early days of Islam have always tried to deceive the people with a deceitful appearance, and today, with the slogan of human rights, freedom and progress, they seek to deceive and Almighty Allah has warned about their intrigues"
....
نماینده ولی فقیه در آذربایجان غربی توضیح داد: آیه 44 سوره نساء مربوط به یهودیانی است که تورات را تحریف کرده بودند و توان دیدن رشد و پیشرفت مسلمانان را نداشتند، بنابراین از عملکرد مسلمانان و احسان آنان آزرده می شدند، در زبان و گفتار به دوستی به مسلمانان تظاهر می کردند اما در اصل دشمن بوده و با چنین ظاهری سعی در فریب مسلمانان داشتند.
The representative of the Wali Faqih in West Azerbaijan explained: Verse 44 of the Nisa Sura is related to Jews who distorted the Torah and did not have the ability to see the growth of Muslims, so they were disillusioned with the performance of Muslims and their goodness, in friendship with language and speech They pretended to be Muslims, but they were in effect an enemy and, with such an appearance, tried to deceive the Muslims.


http://www.rasanews.ir/detail/News/467411/14
14 Dec 2016:

آیت الله نوری همدانی:
نرمش نشان دادن و به دست ‌آوردن دل کفار معنا ندارد
حضرت ‌آیت الله نوری همدانی با بیان این که نرمش نشان دادن و به دست آوردن دل کفار معنا ندارد، گفت: قرآن می فرماید تا زمانی که انسان از یهود و نصارا پیروی کامل نکند آنها راضی نخواهند شد.
Ayatollah Nouri Hamedani: It does not make sense to win heart of an infidel.
Ayatollah Nouri Hamedani, saying that it is senseless to gain the heart of the infidel, said: "The Quran says that Jews and Christians will not be satisfied until the human being follows them completely
به گزارش خبرنگار خبرگزاری رسا، حضرت آیت الله حسن نوری همدانی از مراجع تقلید عصر امروز در دیدار رییس و اعضای سازمان بسیج مهندسین صنعتی کشور با اشاره به آیاتی از قرآن گفت: یکی از صفات همراهان پیامبر اسلام اشداه الکفار و مبارزه و مقاوم بودن در برابر آن ها است.
According to Reza News Agency, Hazrat Ayatollah Hassan Nouri Hamedani from the authorities of today's era during the meeting with the chairman and members of the Basij Organization of Industrial Engineers of the country, referring to verses from the Quran, said: One of the traits of the companions of the Prophet of Islam, is that they were harsh on infidels and fought and resisted them
وی افزود: کفار را باید شناخت و در برابر آن ها مقاومت کرد از این رو نباید در برابر آن ها  نرمش و مذاکره داشت، در برابر کفار باید قوی بود و با آن ها مبارزه کرد، با سران کفر و شرک باید جنگید چون عهد و پیمان سرشان نمی شود.
He added: "The infidels must be recognized and resisted. Therefore, you should not be lenient to them and negotiate with them, you must be strong against the infidels and fight them, fight with the leaders of disbelief and polytheism, because they do not abide by the convenant

استاد برجسته درس خارج حوزه علمیه قم با بیان این که خوارج هماننند تکفیری های امروز بودند که ادعای اسلام داشتند، اظهار داشت: این ها ادعای مسلمان بودن دارند اما با اسلام ناب مبارزه می کنند، از این رو در برابر دشمنان و ایادی آن ها نباید کوتاه آمد.

The prominent professor in the lesson outside the Qom Seminary, arguing that the Kharijites were the Takfiris of today who claimed Islam, stated: "They claim to be Muslim, but fight with pure Islam,
 Therefore, they should not be shortened against their enemies and their enemies.




https://www.al-islam.org/sv/node/15989
http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2132/
http://www.al-islam.org/islamic-laws-ayatullah-ali-al-husayni-al-sistani/taharat#kafir
http://www.al-islam.org/islamic-laws-ayatullah-abul-qasim-al-khui/impure-things-najasat#infidel
"107. An infidel i.e. a person who denies Allah or the Day of judgement, or associates anyone else with Allah, is impure. Similarly Ghulat (i.e. those who believe one of the holy twelve Imams to be God or say that God has penetrated into him) and khawarij and Nawasib (i.e. those who are enemies of the holy Imams) are also impure. And similar is the case with one who denies Prophethood or one of the necessities of religion i,e. a thing like prayers, and fasting, which are considered by the Muslims to be a part of the religion of Islam when he knows at thing is a necessity of religion. As regards the people of the Book (i.e. the Jews and the Christians) who do not accept the Prophethood of the last of the Prophet Muhammad bin Abdullah (Peace be upon him and his progeny), they, too, are impure according to well-known narrations and this remark is as a precautionary measure. Hence, it is necessary to avoid them also.
108. The entire body of an infidel and even his hair and nails and all liquid substances of his body are impure.
109. If the mother, father, paternal grandmother and paternal grandfather of a minor child are all infidels that child is also impure, except that he should be conscious of professing Islam. In case, however, even one person out of his parents or grandparents is a Muslim the child is pure.
110. A person about whom it is not known whether he is a Muslim or not is pure. However, he does not enjoy other orders applicable to the Muslims, for example he cannot marry a Muslim woman and should not be buried in the graveyard of the Muslims.
111. Any person, who abuses any of the twelve holy Imams on account of enmity, is impure."


http://www.al-islam.org/islamic-laws-ayatullah-abul-qasim-al-khui/punishment-prescribed-certain-sins 
"2806. If a person. who is adult and sane, kills a Muslim intentionally and unjustly, and the person killed is a man or a boy, his guardian may forgive the murderer or kill him. However, if the person killed is an infidel and his murderer is a Muslim, the murderer cannot be killed. And if the person killed is a Muslim woman or girl and though her Muslim murderer can be killed, yet if he is a man, half of the diyah should be given to her guardian and if he is an insane person or a minor, only diyah should be given, and her diyah is obligatory on Aqilah [i.e. the relatives of the killer from father's side]".  

......

2807. And if the person killed is a woman who is a Muslim and free, her diyah in each of the above mentioned things is half of the diyah of a man. And if the person killed is a zimmi infidel his/her diyah is 800 dirhams in the case of a male and, 400 dirhams in the case of a female. And if the person killed is a non-zimmi infidel no diyah is payable. And the diyah of a slave or slave girl who is killed is his/her price, provided it does not exceed the diyah of a free person and even if it is a care of intentional murder the murderer who is a free person cannot be killed for the sake of a slave or slave girl."

https://www.al-islam.org/ritual-and-spiritual-purity-sayyid-muhammad-rizvi/i-najasat-taharat
As for the mushrikfn, the mujtahids are unanimous that they are najis. 
....There are three other groups -ghulat, nawasib, and khawarij- who are also considered kafir and najis by the Shi'ah fiqh, in spite of the fact that these groups were off shoots of Muslims during the early stage of the Islamic history. 


http://www.iranfocus.com/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6835
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article1947337.ece
20 April 2006: "MUSLIM students training to be imams at a British college with strong Iranian links have complained that they are being taught fundamentalist doctrines which describe non-Muslims as “filth”.

The Times has obtained extracts from medieval texts taught to the students in which unbelievers are likened to pigs and dogs. The texts are taught at the Hawza Ilmiyya of London, a religious school, which has a sister institution, the Islamic College for Advanced Studies (ICAS), which offers a degree validated by Middlesex University.

...The text that has upset some students is the core work in their Introduction to Islamic Law class and was written by Muhaqqiq al-Hilli, a 13th century scholar. The Hawza Ilmiyya website states that “the module aims to familiarise the student with the basic rules of Islamic law as structured by al-Hilli”.
...
‘There are ten types of filth and impurities: urine, faeces, semen, carrion, blood of carrion, dogs, pigs, disbelievers’

‘When a dog, a pig, or a disbeliever touches or comes in contact with the clothes or body [of a Muslim] while he [the disbeliever] is wet, it becomes obligatory- compulsory upon him [the Muslim] to wash and clean that part which came in contact with the disbeliever."’


http://www.woolf.cam.ac.uk/uploads/seminary%20rpt%20final%20june%2008.pdf
According to Sheikh Hakimelahi, the Director of the seminary programme at Hawza Ilmiyya in London (a Shi’a seminary):
We do not teach about other religions because there just is not time to do so in our packed programme.

The Hawza Ilmiyya came under media attack last year after having been accused of using textbooks that consider Jews and Christians as filth and enemies. The case was even raised in Parliament. Sheikh Hakimelahi explained:
We no longer have textbooks in our curriculum which teach that the Ahl al-Kitab (People of the Book) are najs (filth). Whenever the topic comes up in our fiqh (jurisprudence) classes we do explain to our students the current opinion of Shi’a jurists. According to our current Shi’a jurists and religious authorities, the Ahl al-Kitab are not considered najs (filth) and the previous legal opinion is considered invalid.


http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5222/iran-jews
"Upon his arrival in Iran after the Islamic Revolution had succeeded in overthrowing the Shah, Khomeini made crystal clear that his sympathies lay with the Palestinian Arabs. But he also delineated between Iranian Jews and Zionist Jews -- that the former were loyal to Iran. However, following the 9 May execution of prominent Iranian Jewish businessman Habib Elghanian, the Jews of Iran began to emigrate en masse. Hundreds of Jews were executed in the first few years of the Islamic Republic under Khomeini, including a 13-year-old boy executed because he wrote a letter to relatives in Israel. Under Khamenei, the present Supreme Leader, the Ministry of Intelligence and Security constantly monitor the remaining Iranian Jews.Paydavand Vol. II. "The Events of 1979: 9 May.""
========

Extracts from the page 178 and 179 of the book "Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth Century" By Rudolph Peters
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7EAsmttzXjcC&pg=PA178&lpg=PA178#v=onepage&q&f=false 
http://legalportal.am/download/library/p16v8rklpq19vo3pn1vh3ugb1cbe3.pdf
"Under classical Islamic criminal law, Muslims and non-Muslims do not always have the same rights. Different treatment exists in the fields of evidence, the law of retaliation and bloodmoney, and with regard to the application of certain fixed penalties. Under classical Islamic law the testimonies of non-Muslim witnesses are not admitted in court. Although the newly enacted codes are silent on this point, it is plausible that in court practice this rule will be followed. The classical schools of jurisprudence differ on the amount of the bloodprice for non-Muslims, but are in agreement that it is lower than that of a Muslim. None of the Shari'a penal codes is explicit on this point. But here the same reasoning applies as that I mentioned above when discussing the bloodprice of women: the codes only mention the bloodprice of Muslim males, from which it can be inferred that the bloodprice of a non-Muslim has a different value. It is plausible that the rules of classical doctrine would be applied, which would theo- retically mean that in non-Hanafite countries (such as Libya or Northern Nigeria) a Muslim cannot be sentenced to death if he kills a non-Muslim. I have, however, no information on whether or not this rule is actually being applied. In Iran, a Muslim who has killed a non-Muslim can be sentenced to death only if the victim’s heirs pay the difference in bloodprices. Another problem exists in Iran with regard to adherents of the Bahai religion, who are not regarded as protected subjects, dhimm ̄ıs, since the Bahai religion is not recognised under Iranian law. If a Muslim kills a Bahai, retaliation is not possible, neither can the victim’s heirs claim bloodmoney. A final issue where non-Muslims are put in an inferior position to Muslims is the law of qadhf (unfounded allegation of unlawful sexual intercourse). Some Shari'a penal codes protect only Muslims against this form of defamation and not non-Muslims (e.g. art. 5 Pakistan, Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of h. add) Ordinance, 1979). Others are silent on this point. In some cases the discrimination between Muslims and non-Muslims works in favour of the latter: the Northern Nigerian Shari ë a penal codes apply only to Muslims and not to non-Muslims. The latter fall under the 1959 Northern Nigerian Penal Code. The result is that the same offence, e.g. theft or unlawful sexual intercourse, incurs a much more severe punishment for Muslims than for non-Muslims. In Iran non-Muslims will only be punished for drinking alcohol if they do so publicly, whereas for Muslims drinking alcohol is always a punishable offence (Iranian Penal Code, art. 174)." 


http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2007/100595.htm
2007:  Although the constitution mandates an Islamic army, members of religious minorities served in the military, although non-Muslim promotions were limited by a military restriction against non-Muslims commanding Muslims. Reportedly non-Muslims can be officers during their mandatory military service but cannot be career military officers.
The legal system previously discriminated against recognized religious minorities in relation to blood money; however, in 2004 the Expediency Council authorized collection of equal blood money for the death of Muslim and non-Muslim men. All women and Baha'i and Sabean-Mandean men remained excluded from the revised ruling. According to the law, Baha'i blood is considered mobah, meaning it can be spilled with impunity.


https://www.essex.ac.uk/hri/documents/HRIU_Research_Paper-IRI_Criminal_Code-Overview.pdf
"Different treatment exists, for example, with regard to the law of retaliation and blood money. If a Muslim kills a Christian, for example, the qisas (retaliation) cannot be requested by the heirs of the victim and they can only ask for diya: 

“Article 299- Qisas shall be delivered only if … the victim is … equal in religion with the perpetrator. 
Note- When the victim is a Muslim, the fact that the murderer is a non-Muslim does not prevent the qisas.” 
 
In addition, before 2003, even the amount of blood money for non-Muslims was a highly controversial issue and different religious scholars had different views in this regard. In 2003, an amendment was made in the Penal Code and the equal blood money for religious minorities was accepted. Accordingly, article 548 of the new Penal Code has provided that: 

“According to the order of the Supreme Leader, the diya (blood money) of the religious minorities which recognized in the Constitution shall be equal to diya of Muslims”. 

.. IRI has limited the term “religious minorities” to the three above-mentioned religions and does not recognize the believers of other religions such as Baha’is, Sufis, Mandanis, etc. as religious minorities. It is even worse when it comes to non- believers and atheists and those converted from Islam. As a result, for example, if a Muslim kills a Baha’i, qisas (retaliation) is not possible, neither can the victim’s heirs claim blood money.

 Another issue where non-Muslims (whether or not belong to the three recognized religions) are put in an inferior position to Muslims is that under classical Islamic law the testimonies of non- Muslim witnesses against Muslims are not admitted in court. Moreover, with regard to the application of certain fixed penalties, the new Penal Code follows the old patterns of Islamic Shari’a and treats non-Muslims differently and sometimes harsher. For example, if a non- Muslim (whether married or not) commits zina (illicit sex) with a Muslim woman, or commits livat (sodomy) with a Muslim man, he shall be sentenced to death. But this is while, if the perpetrator is a Muslim, the death penalty may be given only if he is married (mohsan). Similarly if a non-Muslim man commits tafkhiz (livat without penetration) with a Muslim man, he shall be sentenced to death; while, if he is a Muslim he shall be given 100 lashes."


https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/ir0108a.pdf
According to the Constitution, non-Muslims cannot hold the following key decision-making positions:
- President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who must be a Shi’a Muslim (Article 115)
- Commanders in the Islamic Army (Article 144)
- Judges, at any level (Article 163 and law of 1983 on the selection of judges)

Moreover, non-Muslims are not eligible to become members of the Parliament (the Islamic Consultative Assembly) through the general elections.

https://www.iranhumanrights.org/2012/01/letter-sunni-mps/
Article 115 states, “The president must be among religious and political figures and have the following qualifications for elections: Iranian descent, Iranian citizenship, be a wise manager, have a good record and be trustworthy and pious, be faithful and a believer in the principles of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a member of the official religion of the country.” Since Article 12 of the Iranian Constitution defines the official religion of Iran to be Ethna Ashari (Twelver Shiism), Sunnis are prohibited from becoming candidates in the presidential elections.

http://www.iranhrdc.org/english/human-rights-documents/iranian-codes/1000000455-english-translation-of-books-1-and-2-of-the-new-islamic-penal-code.html
Article 224- In the following cases the hadd punishment for zina is the death penalty:
(a)   Zina with blood relatives who are prohibited to marry.
(b)   Zina with a step-mother; in which case, the man who committed zina shall be sentenced to the death penalty.
(c)    Zina of a non-Muslim man with a Muslim woman; in which case, the man who committed zina shall be sentenced to the death penalty.
(d)   Zina committed by coercion or force [i.e. rape]; in which case, the man who committed zina by coercion or force shall be sentenced to the death penalty.
Note 1- Punishment of the woman who has committed zina in paragraphs (b) and (c) shall be in accordance with other provisions of zina.

Article 234- The hadd punishment for livat shall be the death penalty for the insertive/active party if he has committed livat by using force, coercion, or in cases where he meets the conditions for ihsan; otherwise, he shall be sentenced to one hundred lashes. The hadd punishment for the receptive/passive party, in any case (whether or not he meets the conditions for ihsan) shall be the death penalty.
Note 1- If the insertive/active party is a non-Muslim and the receptive/passive party is a Muslim, the hadd punishment for the insertive/active party shall be the death penalty.

Article 236- In the case of tafkhiz, the hadd punishment for the active and passive party shall be one hundred lashes and it shall make no difference whether or not the offender meets the conditions of ihsan [mentioned in note 2 of article 234], or whether or not [the offender] has resorted to coercion.
Note- If the active party is a non-Muslim and the passive party is a Muslim, the hadd punishment for the active party shall be the death penalty.


https://www.facebook.com/notes/muslim-unity/%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%A6%D9%84%DB%81-%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%82%D9%88%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85%D8%A8%D9%84%DB%8C-%D9%85%DB%8C%DA%BA-%D8%B4%DB%8C%D8%B9%DB%81-%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D9%81/702394749798638/
مولانا شیخ محمد حسین نجفی مرحوم جو اس صدی کے شیعہ علماء میں ایک اہم مقام رکھتے ہیں ان کی کتاب اصل و اصول شیعہ میں ہے کہ: "جو شخص بھی نبوت یا نزول وحی کا دعوا کرے واجب القتل ہے" .
...
قادیانیت پر شیعہ موقف جاننے کیلئے اس مختصر پی ڈی ایف فائل کو ڈونلوڈ کیجئے:-

http://bit.ly/1qaJDLb


http://www.nmt.org.pk/nooremarfat/item/91
Shia view on Qadianis


http://www.al-islam.org/faith-and-reason-ayatullah-mahdi-hadavi-tehrani/question-13-non-muslims-and-hell
This can be better understood when we consider that there are two groups of people who do not believe in Islam:
1. Those who are termed ‘Jahil-e-Muqassir’ (lit. ‘culpable ignorant’) and who are obstinate non-believers. That is, Islam has reached them and they have understood its truthfulness; however, they are not prepared to accept the truth due to their obstinacy and stubbornness. This group of non-believers deserves to be punished in Hell because despite having known the truth, they have chosen with their own free will to reject Islam. These non-believers, even though they may be of good conduct, could have attained salvation but instead have closed the path to salvation themselves as they have covered the truth and are rebellious and obstinate in relation to it. As a result, they have chosen their own predicament.
2. Those who are termed ‘Jahil-e-Qasir’ (lit. ‘inculpable ignorant’). These are non-believers to whom the message of Islam has not reached, or it has been presented to them in a very incomplete and untruthful manner; so for example, they think that Islam has the same status and rank as the religions of India and China and at the most, Judaism and Christianity. This group of non-believers, whether they live in the most remote parts of the world or in the most civilized, will not be subject to the punishments of Hell because they are not blameworthy for their lack of belief, and punishment is only for blameworthy sinners.
.......

In conclusion, from the point of view of Islam, those who have not heard about the true message of Islam and are not blameworthy with regard to this will attain salvation if they are truthful to their own religion. This religion must be based on the ‘fitrah’2—man’s primordial, innate nature—and so the followers of such a religion, for example, abstain from lying and committing crimes against humanity. This rule is also applicable to the Ahlus Sunnah to whom the truthfulness of Shi’aism has not been explained correctly."




http://www.al-khoei.us/fatawa1/index.php?id=1802
السؤال :  هل السرقة من الكافر الحربي ، أو الغش له في المعاملة ، أو غيرها جائز ، أم أن حرمة ذلك مطلقة ؟
الجواب :  نعم لا حرمة معهم في ما ذكر ، والله العالم.
Question: Is it permissible to steal from the infidel at war (kafir harbi), or cheat him in the transaction, or other legal matter, or is it absolutely forbidden?


The answer: Yes. Not forbidden in what mentioned, and God Knows.



http://www.al-khoei.us/fatawa1/index.php?id=361
السؤال : وهل يجوز سب أهل البدع والريب ، ومباهتتهم والوقيعة فيهم ؟
الجواب : إذا ترتب ردع منكر على تلك ، فلا بأس
"Question: Is it permitted to insult the people of Innovations and Doubts, as well as slander and abuse them?
Answer: If that results in pushing back of Evil, then there is no problem in it".


https://www.al-islam.org/wilayah-station-master-ayatullah-murtadha-mutahhari/word-wali#1-negative-wila
Thus, like it or not, the relation of a Muslim with a non-Muslim cannot be equal with, or, even sometimes, closer than the relation of a Muslim with a Muslim.
The friendly and sincere relationship of Muslims with one another must be within the limit that membership of one body and participation in one whole requires. Wila’ of the negative sort in Islam expresses the fact that a Muslim should always realize in an encounter with a non-Muslim that he is encountering a member of an alien body, and the meaning of saying that there must not be wila' with non- Muslims, is that the relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims must be within the limit of the relationship between Muslims themselves, which means that a Muslim should not accept membership of a non-Muslim body; or, put in other words, his membership of the Islamic body should not be ignored.
Thus, there is no inconsistency in a Muslim being benevolent and kind towards a non- Muslim and at the same time not accepting his wila' (allegiance with him), that is to say that the Muslim must not count him a member of the body of which he himself is a member, and should behave towards him as an outsider.
...humanitarianism does not demand that we impose no restrictions between these people whose illness, it so happens, is contagious, and individuals who are healthy or have been cured. Thus, it is that Islam, on the one hand, counts generosity and kindness towards non- Muslims as permissible, but, on the other hand, does not permit that a Muslim should accept the protection (wila') of a non-Muslim.


https://www.al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-ayatullah-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/seventh-greater-sin-qata-ar#it-does-not-matter-if-we-are-kind-certain-relatives-who-are-not-muslim
Undoubtedly Islam orders us to detest kafirs, hence it is improper to behave well with them. Good behaviour towards a Kafir is an outward act and at a social level. While hating him for being an Kafir is how you feel and think about him at a spiritual level. Since Sileh-Rahem is obligatory, we must behave well with our Kafir relatives, but at no stage should we be oblivious of the fact that they are non-believers and deserve to be hated for being Kafirs.

Silet ar-Rahm to Kafir Relatives Should Not Encourage Them in Their Disbelief

If Silet ar-Rahm towards a Kafir relative, in some way, strengthens his conviction towards his own religious views; or if Sileh-Rahem towards a sinful relative provides him with opportunity and encouragement in his unlawful ways, then this kind of Silet ar-Rahm is forbidden. In fact, if Qat’a ar-Rahm induces a disbeliever to introspect and reconsider his disbelief, then, Qat’a ar-Rahm is obligatory on us. In the same way Qat’a ar-Rahm is obligatory if it discourages or dissuades a relative in his sinful ways.

Dissociating With the Enemies of Islam

There is another situation where Qat’a ar-Rahm is Wajib (obligatory). That is when the kafir or sinful relative harbors malice towards the religion of Islam. Allah (S.w.T.) says in Surah al-Mujādala:
“You shall not find people who believe in Allah and the latter day befriending those who act in opposition to Allah and His apostle, even though they were their (own) fathers, or their sons or their brothers or their kinsfolk...” (Surah al-Mujādala 58:22)
This verse clearly indicates that one must abstain from Silet ar-Rahm towards even the closest of relatives if they are inimical towards Allah (S.w.T.) or the Holy Prophet (S) or the Islamic faith.


https://www.al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-ayatullah-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/twelfth-greater-sin-qazaf
Similarly if a Muslim accuses falsely a Kafir of adultery or sodomy, the penalty of qazaf does not apply. Yet it is Harām to associate even a Kafir with adultery and sodomy.


https://www.al-islam.org/islam-and-religious-pluralism-ayatullah-murtadha-mutahhari/value-belief#belief-prophecy-and-imāmate
the reason that Islām differentiates between polytheists and the People of the Book in its laws of interaction in that it doesn’t tolerate the polytheist but tolerates the People of the Book, it forces the polytheist to abandon his or her belief but doesn’t force the People of the Book is that the polytheist or atheist, by virtue of his or her polytheism or denial, forever closes the gate of salvation for him or herself and is in a condition of having deprived him or herself of crossing the material world and ascending to the higher world and eternal Paradise.
However, the People of the Book are in a condition in which they can perform good deeds, even if in a deficient manner, and with certain conditions can attain the results of those actions.

we deduce that the good deeds of unbelievers, with all their deceptive appearances, are a mirage that lacks reality. And as for their evil deeds, alas! They are evil above evil, darkness upon darkness!



https://www.al-islam.org/islamic-laws-ayatullah-ali-al-husayni-al-sistani/slaughtering-and-hunting-animals
(i) A person, a man or a woman, who slaughters an animal must be a Muslim. An animal can also be slaughtered by a Muslim child who is mature enough to distinguish between good and bad, but not by non-Muslims other than Ahle Kitab, or a person belonging to those sects who are classified as Kafir, like, Nawasib - the enemies of Ahlul Bait (A.S.). In fact, even if Ahle Kitab non-Muslim slaughters an animal, as per precaution, it will not be halal, even if he utters 'Bismillah'
....
The hunter should be a Muslim or at least a Muslim child who can distinguish between good and bad. If a non-Muslim, other than Ahle Kitab, or from those sects like, Nawasib - enemies of Ahlul Bait (A.S.) who are classified as Kafir, hunts an animal, the animal is not halal. As a matter of precaution, an animal hunted by Ahle Kitab is also not halal, even if he may have uttered the name of Allah.



http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01251/
Question: Is Kosher meat halal?
Answer: It is not halal.
Question: Are chickens slaughtered by Christians Halal?
Answer: They are not halal.


http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/234987020-reply-of-salam-to-non-believers/ 
لَا تَبْدَءُوا أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ بِالتَّسْلِيمِ وَ إِذَا سَلَّمُوا عَلَيْكُمْ فَقُولُوا وَ عَلَيْكُمْ
‘Do not initiate salaam (with) the Ahl Al-Kitaab (People of the book) , but if they offered salaam onto you, just say, “wa ‘Alaykum”’
  • Source:
  • Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 2, pg. 648 - 649, hadeeth # 2
    Grading:
  • Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Muwaththaq (Reliable)
    --> Mir'aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 546
سَأَلْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع عَنِ الْيَهُودِيِّ وَ النَّصْرَانِيِّ وَ الْمُشْرِكِ إِذَا سَلَّمُوا عَلَى الرَّجُلِ وَ هُوَ جَالِسٌ كَيْفَ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يَرُدَّ عَلَيْهِمْ فَقَالَ يَقُولُ عَلَيْكُمْ
“I asked Aboo `Abd Allaah (as), about Jewish, Christians and the Mushrik greetings to one sitting, how should he respond onto them? So he (as) said,‘He will say, ‘‘Alaykum’”
  • Source:
  • Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 2, pg. 649, hadeeth # 3
    Grading:
  • Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Muwaththaq (Reliable)
    --> Mir'aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 546
إِذَا سَلَّمَ عَلَيْكَ الْيَهُودِيُّ وَ النَّصْرَانِيُّ وَ الْمُشْرِكُ فَقُلْ عَلَيْكَ
"If a Jew, Christain or a Mushrik says salaam to you, he (should) say: `Alayk
  • Source:
  • Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 2, pg. 649, hadeeth # 4
    Grading:
  • Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Muwaththaq (Reliable)
    --> Mir'aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 546
قُلْتُ لِأَبِي الْحَسَنِ مُوسَى ع أَ رَأَيْتَ إِنِ احْتَجْتُ إِلَى الطَّبِيبِ وَ هُوَ نَصْرَانِيٌّ أَنْ أُسَلِّمَ عَلَيْهِ وَ أَدْعُوَ لَهُ قَالَ نَعَمْ إِنَّهُ لَا يَنْفَعُهُ دُعَاؤُكَ
I asked Aboo Al-Hasan Moosa (as) ‘If I needed to visit a physician and he is a Christain, can I offer salaam and pray for him?’ He (as) said:, ‘Yes, but your prayer will not benefit him.’”
  • Source:
  • Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 2, pg. 650, hadeeth # 7
    Grading:
  • Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Hasan (Good)
    --> Mir'aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 547
قُلْتُ لِأَبِي الْحَسَنِ مُوسَى ع أَ رَأَيْتَ إِنِ احْتَجْتُ إِلَى الطَّبِيبِ وَ هُوَ نَصْرَانِيٌّ أَنْ أُسَلِّمَ عَلَيْهِ وَ أَدْعُوَ لَهُ قَالَ نَعَمْ إِنَّهُ لَا يَنْفَعُهُ دُعَاؤُكَ
I asked Aboo Al-Hasan Moosa (as) ‘If I needed to visit a physician and he is a Christain, can I offer salaam and pray for him?’ He (as) said:, ‘Yes, but your prayer will not benefit him.’”
  • Source:
  • Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 2, pg. 650, hadeeth # 8
    Grading:
  • Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is SaHeeH
    --> Mir'aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 548
Here are some stuff about Shaking hands with a non-Muslim:
فِي مُصَافَحَةِ الْمُسْلِمِ الْيَهُودِيَّ وَ النَّصْرَانِيَّ قَالَ مِنْ وَرَاءِ الثَّوْبِ فَإِنْ صَافَحَكَ بِيَدِهِ فَاغْسِلْ يَدَكَ
“About a Muslim shaking hands with a Jew or a Christian he had said, ‘Shake hands with them from behind a cloth and if you shook their hand without (being behind) a cloth then you must wash your hands.’”
  • Source:
  • Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 2, pg. 650, hadeeth # 10
    Grading:
  • Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Muwaththaq (Reliable)
    --> Mir'aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 548
فِي رَجُلٍ صَافَحَ رَجُلًا مَجُوسِيّاً قَالَ يَغْسِلُ يَدَهُ وَ لَا يَتَوَضَّأُ
“About a man who had shaken hand with a Majoos (Zoroastrian), the Imam said, ‘He must wash his hands but he does not need to perform wuDooo'.’”
  • Source:
  • Al-Kulayni, Al-Kaafi, vol. 2, pg. 650, hadeeth # 12
    Grading:
  • Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is SaHeeH
    --> Mir'aat Al-`Uqool, vol. 12, pg. 548
(salam)





http://ur.shabestan.ir/detail/News/61265 
کفارکے مساجد میں داخل ہونے کے بارے میں فقہاء کے درمیان اختلاف پایا جاتا ہے،ابوحنیفہ نےاسے جائز قراردیا ہے،مالک نے اس کی اجازت نہیں دی ہے اورشافعی مسجدا لحرام اوردیگرمساجد کے درمیان فرق کا قائل ہے۔
شیخ طوسی نےاپنی کتاب النھایہ میں آیت انما  المشرکون نجس۔ ۔ ۔ کی تفسیر میں کہا ہےکہ ظاہرا  یہ آیت کفار کی نجاست کا حکم لگاتی ہے تاہم ان کےلیے مسجد کے کسی  بھی حصے میں جانا جائز نہیں ہے اس لیے کہ ان کا شرک،ان کی نجاست کا حکم دیتا ہے اوران سے اجتناب کرنا واجب ہے۔
وہ اپنی کتاب الخلاف میں لکھتے ہیں کہ مشرکین مسجد الحرام یا دیگرمساجد میں داخل نہیں ہوسکتے ہیں خواہ امام مسلمین یا حاکم اسلام کی اجازت ہو خواہ اجازت نہ ہو۔ لیکن انہوں نے اپنی کتاب المبسوط میں ضرورت کے تحت مسجد میں ان کی عارضی سکونت کو قبول کیا ہوا ہے اوراس کی دلیل یہ پیش کی ہے کہ رسول خدا صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم نے بنی قریضہ اوربنی النضیر کے قیدیوں کو مسجد میں جگہ دی تھی۔ پھر کہا ہے کہ البتہ مسجد میں داخل ہونے کی اجازت اس مذکورہ آیت کے نزول سے پہلے سے مربوط ہے لہذا انہوں نے اس کو ترک کرنا بہترقراردیا ہے۔
شرایع الاسلام کےمولف محقق حلی اورمرحوم علامہ نے قواعد الاحکام میں جائز نہ ہونے کا حکم دیا ہے اورشہیدثانی نےمسالک الافہام میں اجماع کا دعویٰ کیا ہے۔ مجمع البیان کے مولف نے مفسرین کے اقوال نقل کرتے ہوئے لکھا ہےکہ کہا گیا ہے کہ اس آیت سے مراد حج اورعمرہ کےایام میں مسجد الحرام میں ان کے داخل ہونے کی ممانعت ہے اوروہ بھی حکومتی حکم کی بنا پراوربعض نے کہا ہے کہ تمام مساجد اوراسی طرح حج کے ایام میں اورحرم میں داخل ہونے سے انہیں منع کیا گیا ہے۔
مرحوم علامہ طباطبائی نے بھی تفسیرالمیزان میں لکھا ہےکہ عرفی فہم کے مطابق مومنین کو حکم دیا گیا ہے کہ وہ مشرکین کو مسجد الحرام  میں داخل نہ ہونیں دیں اوراس کی جو دلیل بیان کی گئی ہے وہ یہ ہےکہ کیونکہ مشرکین نجس ہیں،اس سے معلوم ہوتا ہے کہ مشرکین کے لیے ایک قسم کی  پلیدی اورنجاست اورمسجدا لحرام کے لیے ایک قسم کی طہارت اورپاکیزی کا لحاظ کیا گیا ہے اور لحاظ جو بھی ہو اس مسئلے کے علاوہ ہے کہ جس میں گیلے کفارسےملاقات کرنے سے اجتناب  کرنےکو بیان کیا گیا ہے۔
....
کتاب،مسجد ،نہاد عبادت اورستاد ولایت سے اقتباس



https://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00456.html 
In the words of Ayatullah  Seestani: "...When the one making the will is a Muslim it should be taken  into consideration that the one named in the will (Wasiy) is also a Muslim,  according to precaution." [al-Masaa`il al-Muntakhabah, Issue 1265, pg. 495]     

http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01267/ 
Question: Is it permissible for the people of Ahlul Kitãb and other non-Muslims to enter the mosques (masjid) and other Islamic places of worship [like husayniyya or imambargah which are not masjid]? And is it necessarily for us to enforce the hijãb on those [non-Muslim women] who do not observe hijãb and allow them to enter [the mosque or places of worship], if it is permissible?
Answer: Based on obligatory precaution, it is not permissible for them [i.e., non-Muslims] to enter the mosque (masjid). As for their entering the places of worship, etc, there is no problem in it. If their entry [in imambargah or a husayniyya or a center] without hijãb is considered as a sign of disrespect, hijãb should be enforced on the [non-Muslim] women.

http://www.sistani.org/english/book/46/2041/
It is not permissible to bury a deceased Muslim in the graveyard of non-Muslims, except if a section of that graveyard is specifically reserved for Muslims. Similarly, no non-Muslim can be buried in the graveyard of Muslims. When it is neither possible to get a grave for a deceased Muslim in the graveyard of Muslims, nor transfer the body to a Muslim country for burial in a Muslim graveyard, that deceased Muslim may be buried in the graveyard of non-Muslims.

http://www.sistani.org/english/book/46/2062/ 
A Muslim man is allowed to marry a Christian or a Jewish woman in temporary marriage. Based on precaution, it is obligatory to refrain from marrying a non-Muslim woman in permanent marriage.A Muslim man is not allowed to marry, neither permanently nor temporarily a non-Muslim woman who is not among Ahlul Kitab. Based on obligatory precaution, a Muslim man must refrain from marrying a Zoroastrian woman, even temporarily. As for a Muslim woman, she is not allowed to marry a non-Muslim man at all. 

 http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2233/
1153. It is not obligatory to give reply to the Salam said in jest, or the Salam of a non-Muslim man or woman who is not a Zimmi (an infidel living under the protection of an Islamic Government). And if he/she is a zimmi, it is sufficient, on the basis of obligatory precaution, to answer saying 'alayka' only. 

http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2348/ 
2406. A Muslim woman cannot marry a non-Muslim, and a male Muslim also cannot marry a non-Muslim woman who are not Ahlul Kitab. However, there is no harm in contracting temporary marriage with Jewish and Christians women, but the obligatory precaution is that a Muslim should not take them in permanent marriage. There are certain sects like Khawarij, Ghulat and Nawasib who claim to be Muslims, but are classified as non-Muslims. Muslim men and women cannot contract permanent or temporary marriage with them. 

http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2368/ 
2603. There are certain conditions for the slaughtering of an animal. They are as follows:-
A person, a man or a woman, who slaughters an animal must be a Muslim. An animal can also be slaughtered by a Muslim child who is mature enough to distinguish between good and bad, but not by non-Muslims other than Ahle Kitab, or a person belonging to those sects who are classified as Kafir, like, Nawasib - the enemies of Ahlul Bait (A.S.). In fact, even if Ahle Kitab non-Muslim slaughters an animal, as per precaution, it will not be halal, even if he utters 'Bismillah'. 

https://www.al-islam.org/five-schools-islamic-law-allamah-muhammad-jawad-maghniyyah/9-inheritance#inheritance-followers-other-religions 
http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2388/
2791. A muslim inherits from a non-Muslim, but a non-Muslim does not inherit from a deceased Muslim, even if he be his father or son.


http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01294/ 
Question: Is it permissible permissible to eat from non Ahlul Kitãb people?
Answer: A Muslim is allowed to eat the food prepared by a non-Muslim who is not from Ahlul Kitãb [for example, a Hindu or a Buddhist], provided that he does not know or is not sure that the non-Muslim touched the food with wetness; and provided that he does not know or is not sure that the food consists of what is forbidden to him like intoxicating drinks. As for meat, fat and their extracts, there are specific rules that will come later on.

http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01120/ 
Question: Is it permissible permissible to eat from non Ahlul Kitãb people?
Answer: A Muslim is allowed to eat the food prepared by a non-Muslim who is not from Ahlul Kitãb [for example, a Hindu or a Buddhist], provided that he does not know or is not sure that the non-Muslim touched the food with wetness; and provided that he does not know or is not sure that the food consists of what is forbidden to him like intoxicating drinks. As for meat, fat and their extracts, the food cooked by non-Muslims should not contain any of these. If the food contains meat and animal fat, he should be sure that they are halal.

http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01178/ 
Question: Can we eat the food that has been cooked by a Hindu?
Answer: If it is not known that the food is Najis and if the food does not contain meat, there would be no problem in eating it. However, if the food has been touched with a wet hand, it is not permissible to eat it.

Sayyid Al-Khoi:
"There is no ishkal and no shakk in the najasah of the mushrikeen, in fact their najasah is amongst the zarooriyaat according to the Shias, and we do not know of anything conflicting in this."
(Al-Tanqeeh fee Sharh Urwatul-Wuthqa, Kitab-ut-Taharah, v. 2, p.42)

http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00202.html
If there is evidence that a Muslim is unmindful of the need to obtain Halal meat, 
then you cannot eat the meat prepared by that Muslim. 

As for the food of the Hindus, if they have prepared it then it is Najis. If
there is any doubt in its preparation or it is packed from a store and the
ingredients are not Najis, then you may consume it.

http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2304/
1950. It is necessary that the person to whom Zakat is paid is a Shi'ah Ithna'ashari. If, therefore, one pays Zakat to a person under the impression that he is a Shi'ah, and it transpires later that he is not a Shi'ah, one should pay Zakat again.

http://www.islam-watch.org/home/165-jon-mc/1523-how-zakat-the-islamic-charity-tax-is-to-be-used-according-to-islam.html
"All the Sharia books quoted state that Zakat alms are only for Muslims, Shia books limit this to Shias. The Sunni books state that Zakat is to be used for Jihad, including violence, against non-Muslims, (so non-Muslims “receive the benefit” of Zakat, but not in a way we would normally expect!) though they disagree as to whether an individual has to support Jihad. The Shia books, on the other hand, do not legitimate the use of Zakat for Jihad but do state that the wealth of the Muslims should be available in time of war (jihad)."


http://sadaatqurancenter.com/BalaghulQuran/60.html 
اہل تحقیق کے مطابق مشرک کے لیے استغفار جائز ہے۔ فَلَمَّا تَبَيَّنَ    بات واضح ہونے سے مراد موت ہے جب مشرک اپنے شرک پر مر جاتا ہے اس کے بعد استغفار جائز نہیں ۔ لہذا اس آیت کا مطلب اس طرح بنتا ہے : ابراہیم اور ان کے ساتھیوں میں 
تمہارے لیے نمونہ ہے کہ وہ اپنی مشرک قوم سے بیزاری اختیار کرتے تھے ۔
....
کافروں سے دوستی کرنا اس صورت میں ممنوع ہے جب مسلمان ان کے ساتھ حالت جنگ میں ہوں۔ اگر یہ کافر ذمّی ہوں یا ان کے ساتھ معاہدہ ہو، یعنی حالت جنگ میں نہ ہوں تو ایسے کافروں کے ساتھ اچھا برتاؤ کرنے، رشتہ داری کا لحاظ رکھنے اور ان کے ساتھ انصاف کرنے میں کوئی حرج نہیں ہے۔ کافروں کے ساتھ ہر قسم کی ولایت کا رشتہ قائم کرنا ممنوع ہے۔ نہ ولایت حمایت و نصرت، نہ ولایت وراثت، نہ ولایت اطاعت، نہ ولایت محبت۔
البتہ اگر ان کافروں کے ساتھ حالت جنگ نہیں ہے تو ان سے ولایت محبت دوستی اس حد تک جائز ہے کہ ان پر احسان کیا جائے اور انصاف کے ساتھ برتاؤ کیا جائے۔
اگر کفار سے حالت جنگ میں ہوں تو کسی قسم کی ولایت قائم کرنا ممنوع ہے۔ حتیٰ خود اہل ایمان کے درمیان بھی ولایت نصرت و حمایت قائم نہیں ہوتی جب تک وہ مؤمن ہجرت نہ کرے ملاحظہ ہو (انفال: 72)۔

http://makarem.ir/main.aspx?reader=1&lid=4&mid=104571&catid=6479&pid=321543
بہرحال ان آیات سے مُسلمانوں کے غیرمسلموں کے ساتھ ر ابطے کی کیفیّت کی ” ایک بُنیادی اورکُلّی اصل “ کا پتہ چلتاہے جونہ صرف اس زمانہ کے لیے بلکہ آج کے اور آئندہ زمانے کے لیے بھی ثابت ہے ،وہ یہ ہے کہ مُسلمانُوں کافرض ہے کہ وہ ہر ایسا گروہ ، جمعیت اورمُلک جو ان سے دشمنی رکھتاہو ، اسلام اور مسلمانوں کے مُخالف ہو یا دشمنانِ اِسلام کی مدد کرتاہو ، اس کے خلاف سختی کے ساتھ مقابلے کے لیے کھڑے ہوجائیں اور ان سے ہرقسم کی دوستی کارشتہ منقطع کرلیں ۔
لیکن اگروہ کافرہونے کے باو جُود اسلام اورمُسلمانوں کے بارے میں غیر جانبدار ہوں ،یا ان کی طرف مائل ہوں توپھرمُسلمان ان کے ساتھ دوستانہ رو ابط رکھ سکتے ہیں ، البتّہ اس حد تک نہیں جو وہ مُسلمان بھا ئیوں کے ساتھ رکھتے ہیں اور نہ ہی اس حدتک کہ وہ مُسلمانوں میں نفُوذ پیدا کرلیں ۔  

http://www.tebyan.net/index.aspx?pid=130797
بے شک رسول خدا صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم نے ارشاد فرمایا:
جس کسی کا اللہ کی توحید اور قیامت پر دل کی گہرائیوں سے ایمان ہے تو ایسا شخص قطعی طور پر کسی کافر سے دوستی نہیں رکھے گا‘ اور کسی فاسق و فاجر شخص سے ہمنشینی اختیار نہیں کرے گا‘ اور اگر کوئی شخص کسی کافر سے دوستی رکھے گا یا اس سے ہمنشینی اختیار کرے گا تو ایسا شخص بھی کافرو فاجر محسوب ہوگا۔
...ابن فضال روایت کرتا ہے کہ میں نے حضرت امام رضا علیہ السلام سے سنا کہ آپ نے ارشاد فرمایا:
جس شخص نے دشمنانِ خدا سے دوستی کی‘ گویا کہ اس نے دوستانِ خدا سے دشمنی کی۔ جس شخص نے دوستانِ خدا سے دشمنی کی تو اس نے خداوند بزرگ و برتر سے دشمنی کی‘ تو اللہ تعالیٰ کے لیے سزاوار ہے کہ ایسے شخص کو نارِ جہنم میں داخل کرے۔

http://www.tebyan.net/QuranIndex.aspx?pid=133762
علاء بن فضیل کا بیان ہے کہ امام جعفر صادق علیہ السلام نے فرمایا:

جس نے کافر سے محبت کی تو اس نے خدا سے دشمنی کی اور جس نے کافر سے دشمنی کی تو اس نے اللہ سے محبت کی۔ پھر آپ نے فرمایا: دشمن خدا سے دوستی رکھنے والا بھی دشمنِ خدا ہے۔

اہلِ شک کی دوستی ممنوع ہے
ایک جماعت شیعہ کا بیان ہے کہ امام جعفر صادق علیہ السلام نے فرمایا:
جو اہل شک سے نشست و برخاست رکھے وہ خود اہلِ شک ہے۔
ناصبی کون ہے
معلی بن خنیس کا بیان ہے کہ میں نے امام جعفر صادق علیہ السلام سے سنا: آپ فرما رہے تھے:
ناصبی (دشمنِ اہل بیت ) وہ نہیں ہے جو ہم اہل بیت سے عداوت رکھے کیونکہ تمہیں دنیا میں ایک فرد بھی ایسا دکھائی نہ دے گا جو علی الاعلان کہے کہ میں محمد و آل محمد سے بغض رکھا ہوں۔
ناصبی وہ ہے جو یہ سمجھ کر تم سے عداوت رکھے کہ تم ہم سے محبت رکھتے ہو اور ہمارے دشمنوں سے بیزار ہو۔ جس نے ہمارے دشمن کو پیٹ بھر کر کھانا کھلایا تو اسے یوں سمجھنا چاہیے جیسے اس نے ہمارے محب کو قتل کیا ہو۔

کتاب کا  نام : علامات شیعہ از نظر معصومین علیھم السلام
مصنف: شیخ صدوق
بشکریہ الحسنین ڈاٹ کام

http://ur.shabestan.ir/detail/News/63278
حوزہ علمیہ قم کے مرکز تخصصی کلام و ادیان کے شعبہ ’’انحرافی فرقے‘‘ کے سرپرست اعلیٰ حجت الاسلام علی رضا روزبھانی نے شبستان نیوز ایجنسی کے نمائندے سے گمراہ فرقے بھائیت سے ربط و تعلق کے حوالے سے گفتگو کرتے ہوئے اس بات کا اظہار کیا ہے کہ چونکہ فقہی نکتہ نظر سے کفر نجاست کا موجب ہے اور کافر انسان نجس ہوتا ہے اس لیے کفار کے ساتھ آمدورفت رکھنا اور ان کے ساتھ سماجی تعلقات رکھنا شرعی لحاظ سے حرام ہے۔
انہوں نے اس بات پر تاکید کی کہ بعض فرقے مثلاً بھائیت وغیرہ اسلام کے جمہوری نظام سے بالکل متصادم ہیں اور اسلام کے مقابلے میں کھڑے ہیں اور یہ لوگ کافر حربی کا حکم رکھتے ہیں۔
انہوں نے اپنی بات کو جاری رکھتے ہوئے کہا کہ بہائیت کا مرکزی ادارہ بیت العدل اسلام کے نظام سے کلی طور پر متصادم ہے۔ یہ لوگ اسلام کے دشمن ہیں اور ان سے کسی بھی قسم کا رابطہ رکھنا ان کی تقویت اور اسلام کی کمزوری کا باعث ہے۔


http://lanatinislam.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/curse-from-shia-point-of-view.html
11)Hazrat  Imam Reza(AS) :
There  are some people who are more dangerous to our shia than the Dajjal .
Narrator asked : who are these people?
Imam(AS) : Those people who love our enemies and hate our lover .
Ref : Sifat-ush-Shia Pg 50 H 14.
.......
26) Imam Jafar Sadiq(AS) :
One who doubts regarding the disbelief of our enemies and of those who oppressed us  is himself a disbeliever.
Ref : Wasael ush Shia Vol 18 Pg 561.

http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/234995893-should-christians-and-jews-be-allowed-in-mecca/?page=3
Here is a quote from the fundamental book of fiqh that is studied in the hawzas today Sharaa'i` al-Islaam by Muhaqqiq al-Hilli.Here is what he says regarding the Ahl al-Dhimmah, he puts this under the chapter of "Rules for the Ahl al-Dhimmah".
و أما المساجد
فلا يجوز أن يدخلوا المسجد الحرام إجماعا و لا غيره من المساجد عندنا و لو أذن لهم لم يصح الإذن لا استيطانا و لا اجتيازا و لا امتيارا.
و لا يجوز لهم استيطان الحجاز على قول مشهور و قيل المراد به مكة و المدينة و في الاجتياز به و الامتيار منه تردد و من أجازه حده بثلاثة أيام و لا جزيرة العرب و قيل المراد بها مكة و المدينة و اليمن و مخاليفها و قيل هي من عدن إلى ريف عبادان طولا و من تهامة و ما والاها إلى أطراف الشام عرضا
As for the Masājid:
It is an ijmā` (unanimously agreed upon) that it is not permissible for them (ahl al-dhimmah) to enter Masjid al-Harām, not (enter) from the other masājid (pl. of masjid) of ours, and if they are given permissible (to enter), it is not a valid (correct) permission, they cannot settle, pass by, and they cannot eat (or bring food into the masjid).
And it is not permissible for them to reside in al-Hijāz according to themashhoor (famous) opinion, and some say that what is meant by it is just Makkah and al-Madīnah. And about passing by and eating from it there is a disagreement. And whoever permits it will receive punishment for three days. And they cannot (reside in) the Arabian Peninsula, and some say what is meant by it is Makkah, al-Madīnah, Yemen and mukhaalifihā (its districts?). And some say it is from `Adn (Yemen area) to the countryside of `Abadān lengthwise, and from Tahāmah** and what comes to the tip of Shām widthwise.
Source:
  • al-Muhaqqiq al-Hilli, Sharaa'i` al-Islaam, vol. 1, Kitaab al-Jihaad, Third Section, Fourth Chapter, pg. 303
** Narrow coastal region of Arabia on the Red Sea


http://lib.ahlolbait.com/parvan/resource/54003/-/preview/52146/-/#!page=83 
http://library.tebyan.net/ar/Viewer/Text/71489/83 
http://saanei.org/index.php?view=01,05,13,95,0 
https://saanei.org/index.php?view=01,02,09,3259,0 
تشبّه به كفّار
(س 194) اخيراً در ميان برخى از جوانان، استفاده از مُدل مو و لباسهايى رايج شده است كه از كشورهاى اروپايى و بلاد بيگانه گرفته شده است. نظر به اينكه پوشيدن اين لباسها و خود اين گونه آرايش كردن، عرفاً از مصاديق تشبّه به كفّار است، آيا شرعاً حرام است يا حلال؟
ج ـ اگر ترويج فرهنگ معاندان و محاربان و دشمنان اسلام باشد، حرام و غير جايز است.

http://islamopediaonline.org/fatwa/muslims-assimilation-behavior-and-cultural-norms-non-muslims?page=17
[Question: Recently, some of the youth are using the fashion and hairstyles that are inspired from European and [other] non-Muslim countries. In your view, what is the status of using such outfit, noting that this is an example for "assimilation to non-Muslims*"?]

[Grand Ayatollah Yusuf Saanei]Answer: This is prohibited if it is equivalent to promoting the culture of those who oppose and fight Islam. * Assimilation to non-Muslims is considered prohibited in Islam.


http://www.leader.ir/en/book/23?sn=5727
Q1370. What is the view on wearing a necktie?
A: Generally speaking, it is not permissible to wear a tie, or other kinds of clothes that are considered as the attire of non-Muslims, in such a way that their wearing will promote vile Western culture.



https://www.al-islam.org/waqf-hajr-and-wasaya-according-five-schools-islamic-law-allamah-muhammad-jawad-maghniyyah/will-and
The schools differ regarding the validity of a will made by a Muslim in favour of a harbi.2 The Malikis, the Hanbalis and most of the Shafi'is consider it valid.
According to the Hanafi and most Imami legists, it is not valid. (al-Mughni, vol.6, al-Jawahir, vol. 5, ‘bab al-wasiyyah’)
.....
2. A dhimmi is a person who pays jizyah to Muslims, while a harbi, according to the Imamiyyah, is one who does not pay jizyah although he may not be at war with them. According to the other schools, harbi is one who takes up arms and attacks travellers on public highways (Ibn Rushd’s al-Bidayah wa al-nihayah, vol.2, ‘bab al-harabah’). Al-Shahid al-Thani in his book al-Masalik, ‘bab al-wasiyyah’, has said: A bequest in favour of anyone who does not fight us due to our religion, irrespective of his being dhimmi or harbi, is valid, in accordance with the verse: لاَ يَنْهَاكُمْ اللَّهُ (60:8,9), as well as the tradition from al-Imam al-Sadiq (A): Give the bequest to the legatee even if he is a Jew or Christian, for surely God has said:
فَمَنْ بَدَّلَهُ بَعْدَمَا سَمِعَهُ فَإِنَّمَا إِثْمُهُ عَلَى الَّذِينَ يُبَدِّلُونَهُ
Then he who alters after having heard it, its sin is on those who have altered it. (2:181)
Here no difference has been made between a harbi and others.


http://www.islam-pure.de/imam/books/ajvab.pdf
http://zaer.hajj.ir/en/SubjectRead.aspx?ID=237 
"A: Wearing gold or hanging it on the neck is absolutely ḥarām for men. It is, also, not permissible to wear clothes whose tailoring style, color, etc. are considered imitation and propagation of the invading culture of non-Muslims in the common view. It is not permissible, as well, to wear an ornament in a way that is regarded as imitation of the invading culture of enemies of Islam and Muslims. The duty of others towards such phenomena is to forbid the evil orally." 


https://www.al-islam.org/code-ethics-muslim-men-and-women-sayyid-masud-masumi/rules-related-covering#5-clothing-specific-non-muslims
169 – Rule: It is haram to wear that clothing which only the non-Muslims make use of. GKL
In the event that it endorses the non-Muslims or makes them powerful, then it is not allowed. A
According to Ihtiyat, one must refrain from imitating the non-Muslims. B
Therefore: It is not permitted for a Muslim man or woman to wear clothing that is commonly worn by Punks, clergymen of the Church, Rabbis, the Hindus, or other groups of non-Muslims.
170 – Rule: There is no problem in wearing that clothing which is common to both Muslims and non-Muslims. BGKLMST
171 – Question: What is the view of Islam on the necktie?
Answer 1: The necktie is the practice of the Christian religion, which has unfortunately become widespread amongst the Muslims. G
Answer 2: The necktie is one of the symbols of the Christians, and it is incumbent on the Muslims to refrain from using it. G
Answer: The necktie is related to and is one of the symbols of the Christians, thus, it is better that the Muslims refrain from wearing it, even though it is no longer prevalent among the Muslims as being a symbol for the Christians


http://www.hudson.org/research/4669-hold-the-line-on-sharia
Sistani discriminates in other major ways between Muslims and non-Muslims. A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim, even if he is the father or son, and a Muslim may receive, but not pay, interest to a non-Muslim. Non-Muslims must also pay extra tax if they buy land from a Muslim.
Unless a life is at stake, post-mortem on a Muslim is forbidden, though allowed on an unbeliever “provided his blood was spared during his life-time.” An unbeliever whose “blood was spared” is one that, unlike the Bahai in Iran, no Muslim jurist has decreed may be killed without penalty. Among things ritually unclean (najis) are pigs, corpses, and “infidels,” who are people who do “not believe in Allah and His Oneness,” and deviant Muslims, who “deny any of the necessary laws of Islam.” Their entire body is najis, though if “the child of an unbeliever is captured by Muslims, and his father, paternal grandfather or maternal grandfather is not with him…” then he is not unclean.
Sistani does not believe that people of the book, Christians and Jews, are najis, though he acknowledges that many other jurists do, and so, on balance, he concludes, “it is better to avoid them.”

http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01220/ 
Question: Is it permitted to pay interest to non-Muslims and also take interest from them?
Answer: Giving interest to a non-Muslim in a deal that is based on interest is impermissible and receiving it (interest) is permissible and there is no objection in it.
http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/70540-celebrating-christmas/?page=2
http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01179/
https://twitter.com/cybertosser/status/812410735800254464
Sistani on Christmas: Greetings r ok but celebrations (eg. gifts, lights, trees) not permissible


http://www.wabil.com/
http://www.wabil.com/browse_categories.php?cid=134
Salam alaikum Sayed Musavi Are we allowed to attend funerals and weddings of christens in the church?

Answer:-  Muslim is not allowed to take part in any non Muslim religious ritual.
Wassalam
Mohammad Al-Musawi


http://www.wabil.com/browse_categories.php?limit=5&cid=149&page=3
Question ID  949  -  Non Muslims Q&A
Salam alaykum wa rahmtullah wa barakatoh as we know that jannat is WAJIB on the mourner of imam husain. Hence, my question is, even a few hindus cry on imam husain. So will those kafirs get jannat too?

Answer:-  No Mushrik will enter the Paradise, but Allah (SWT) will reward every one
who did good deeds in this life.

Question ID  893  -  Interaction in Social Life
Assalamualaikum. I live in a hostel in between non muslims. Do i have to consider each and everyone of them as najs(e.g. their sweat,shaking wet hands,etc) and also the utensils we use in the mess. And can i give my clothes for washing to the laundry operated by non muslims.

Answer:-  Mushrik is Najis and everything touched by Mushrik with wetness becomes
Najis e.g, utensils , cloths , food etc.


Question ID  3339  -  Dress and Clothing
Question SA I have a question please in regards to wearing a bindhi sticker in between the eyebrows where it does not interfere with the forehead area of where the turbah touches when I pray. The stickers are small gems normally worn with Indian outfits. Please advise Many Thanks

Answer Muslim should not wear non Muslims' special things.

http://www.wabil.com/browse_categories.php?limit=40&cid=146&page=2
Question ID  3025  -  Miscellaneous
Salaam Alaikum. I have a question regarding Christmas. I have come across many shias who hold Christmas parties on Christmas day where they have all their shia families coming together. They eat turkey and exchange gifts. I tried to discuss this matter with that shia person telling them that we are adapting their culture into ours which is wrong for us as well as the next generation. But that person replies me by saying that they get just Christmas day where all the family can get together. Also she said that they do not believe in Christmas as in what happened according to Christians but they just eat turkey and exchange gifts. Is this wrong? Please advice me so i am able to shed light to my shia friends. Thank you

Answer:-  It is wrong to adapt the habits or customs of non Muslims.

Question ID  256  -  Food & Drinks
Question Sallam, are muslim alow to eat christain food may be during their festivities?

Answer 
> Question : are muslim alow to eat christain food may be during their festivities?
> Answer: Muslim is not allowed to consume food or drink which is Najis (ritually not pure).
Food of non Muslim religious festivals must be avoided by Muslims.

Question ID  416  -  Food & Drinks
Question i have many hindu friends and they occasionally invite me for dinner and lunch. How should i refuse them as it is not allowed to eat from non muslims house?

Answer We Muslims are not allowed to eat Najis food. If the food which was touched with wetness by a non Muslim (specifically a polytheist who worships other with God) . If the food offered to you by non Muslim was not touched with wetness by them at all like any food which is prepared usually with out being touched with wetness, then it is allowed to eat it because it is not Najis, but if it was been touched with wetness by them, then it became
Najis, and there is no way to eat Najis food whether offered by a Muslim or non Muslim.
If the non Muslim maid touches the wet clothes with out gloves, the clothes become Najis. This if the maid is not from people of Book, according to Ayatullah Sistani verdict. If the clothes are taken from the washing machine with out any wetness, then touched by non Muslim while clothes are not wet, then clothes are Taahir.



Question Can a virgin Jew or Christian girl do mu ta without her father's consent?

Answer Yes she can get married permanently or temporarily with Muslim with out her non Muslim father's permission.

Question ID  2069  -  Medical Issues
Question Is permissable for Muslims to go and seek professional help from nonmuslim Psychologists and Therapists for personal issues, life problems, counseling etc.?

Answer No, it is not permissible to seek guidance how to run your life properly from those who have no faith in The Truth, except in scientific and medical matters which do not have any thing to do with faith. The concept and aim of life in Islam is different from it with non Muslims, so Muslim should not seek guidance in his life matters from those who do not share with him the same concept and aim of life.

Mushrik painter who did not touch the paint with wet hands, did not make the painted items Najis. If Mushrik used Najis paint, then you can make thepainted items, wall Paak by pouring water on it. 

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-islam-ayatollah-idUSTRE65I0M220100619 
19 June 2010:  By issuing a fatwa -- a religious ruling -- Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi has sent a clear message that this trend must stop.
"Friendship with dogs is a blind imitation of the West," he was quoted as saying in Javan daily. "There are lots of people in the West who love their dogs more than their wives and children."

14 July 2010: Mr Ahmadinejad...was criticised by Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami, normally close ally of the Iranian president, who said: "I say to him that many religious dignitaries believe ties should not be worn.
"The supreme guide (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) himself has said in a fatwa (religious edict) that the wearing of ties or bow ties is not permitted."
... Ayatollah Khatami also criticised the president for saying it was not a problem for a man to shave his beard.

http://www.al-islam.org/articles/islamic-hijab-men-shaykh-saleem-bhimji 
"From the Ahadith of the Prophet and the Holy Ahl Al-Bayt (peace be upon all of them), regarding the type of covering that men must observe including the impressibility of imitating the non-Muslims (Kuffar), and the various other conditions, we can draw this conclusion that the man too, just like the Woman must not wear clothing that is not appropriate, tight fitting, and those that show off his body." 


http://www.islam-pure.de/imam/imam_gb/fatwas/further.htm
http://www.alseraj.net/maktaba/kotob/english/Fiqh/MiscellaneousFatwas/imam/fatwas/further.htm
1. Christmas
2.Halloween
3.Valentine's day
1) a. There is no objection in sending them greeting cards upon the advent of this occasion. Yet, it should be done in such a fashion that you encourage them to adhere to the true teachings of the Prophet Jesus (a.s.) by helping and supporting those in need, living a righteous life, etc. b. There is no objection in celebrating the birthday of the Prophet Jesus (a.s.). But putting up and decorating a Christmas tree would promote a fallacious ideology and result in imitating their culture. c. There is no objection to that in itself as long as it does not lead to corruption. 2) If engaging in this practice results in promoting erroneous thinking (e.g. superstition) in the furthering of corruption or in the strengthening and spreading of their culture, whereby it would become desirable to adopt their culture such activity would not be permissible. 3) In general, there is no objection in participating in the mentioned celebration as long as the rules and regulations of the Islamic law are observed and the celebration does not entail any type of corruption.


http://www.shiachat.com/forum/uploads/monthly_06_2008/post-19560-1213073945.gif
https://www.al-islam.org/islamic-business-ethics-sayyid-muhammad-rizvi/your-business-b-haram-business-and-trade
Can a Muslim join the police or armed force of a non­-Muslim government?
Any trade, business or profession that involves i'anatu 'z- zalama-helping the oppressors is forbidden and considered as one of the major sins in Islam. The Qur'an says,
“Do not be inclined towards those who are unjust otherwise the Fire will get you.” (11:13)
So selling any arms, ammunition or apparatus of oppression to an oppressive (non-Muslim or Muslim) government is absolutely haram. Similarly, working for an unjust and oppressive government in the departments that are used to oppress the people is haram for the followers of Ahlu '1-bayt.
......
There are many examples of when the Shi'as had asked the Imams for permission to work with the establishment of the 'Abbasid caliphs. In most cases, they were refused permission by the Imams; and whenever they were exceptionally allowed, the Imams put a condition -you will help your brethren in faith.
A well-known hadith from Imam Ja'far as-Sadiq (a.s) says, “The penance for working for an [unjust] ruler is to fulfill the needs of the brethren.”26


http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/2027-haloweeen-trick-or-treating/?tab=comments#comment-21145
https://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00825.html
1)It is believed that the ritual of Halloween was started by satan-worshippers and adapted by some Christians. Participating in a ritual associated with satan worshippers is abominable and unIslamic. The Holy  Prophet (s) was always concerned about Muslims having their own identity in their appearance and practices-- different from pagans, Christians and Jews. The Noble Prophet abhorred following the ways of non-Muslims.
http://english.alhakeem.com/pages/book.php?bcc=236&itg=1&bi=156&s=ct
Q11: Is it permissible to congratulate non-Muslims on the festivals and occasions which they celebrate such as Christmas, Easter, New Year’s Day, etc.?
A: There is no harm in acting courteously with them, as much as good fellowship and socializing requires, but one should not go too far. In fact, it is unlawful if it leads to promoting falsehood and dealing with it as an established recognized reality.
Q12: Is it permissible to attend their celebrations and exchange gifts with them as they do among themselves on such occasions?
A: It is not permissible as long as it can be avoided.


http://www.al-islam.org/philosophy-islamic-laws-nasir-makarim-shirazi-jafar-subhani/question-17-why-unbeliever-impure
"We do consider that Islam under certain conditions gives the permission for economic, business relations but has not given the permission for eating together or in other words Islam wants that Muslims may keep relations with them and make profit and side by side remain protected from their beliefs and ethics, which can reach to the people while intermingling with them.
....
The orders of Islam do not have any special angle for anyone and to be sure that the limits of Shari’ah are protected. It is necessary that for the generalization of this order be maintained, because if it is not like that, then every person will assume himself to be educated and maintain relations with unbelievers and the laws and orders of the Shari’ah will be subverted. (Think for a while.)
Many unbelievers do not refrain from impure things like blood, pork and alcoholic drinks; and naturally their whole life is unclean. To remain keep from those impurities Islam has announced that they are najis, so that those Muslims who by intermingling with them have the possibility of becoming impure may remain safe."


https://www.al-islam.org/a-code-of-practice-for-muslims-in-the-west-ayatullah-sistani/migration-non-muslim-countries 
http://www.sistani.org/english/qa/01248/ 
At-ta'arrub ba'd al-hijra literally means "becoming shorn of one's percepts of faith after migrating [to city]," and technically, it means leaving an environment where you could follow Islam and moving to a place where you maybe prone to not following Islam. Such a migration is counted as one of the major sins. Abu Basir says that he heard Imam as-Sadiq (a.s.) saying: "The major sins are seven: killing a person intentionally; associating someone or something with the Almighty Allah (shirk); wrongfully accusing a married woman of adultery; Knowingly dealing in usury; running away from the battle-field in jihad; at-ta'arrub ba'd al-hijra; causing distress to one's parents [by encroaching on their rights]; and wrongfully acquiring the property of the orphan." Then he said, "At-ta'arrub and shirk are one and the same [in severity]."1 
......
Question: What is the meaning of at-ta'arrub ba'd al-hijra which is one of the major sins?
Answer: Some jurists have said that during our time, it applies to residing in countries that may cause the loss of faith.


http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235050171-takfir-among-shia/
http://www.sistani.org/arabic/qa/0655/#3586
السؤال: ما تحديدكم للكافر الحربي الغير المحترم النفس والمال؟ وهل يعتبر حربيا ً وان لم يكن في حالة عداء فعلي مع الاسلام ولم يكن قد سمع بالاسلام اصلاً؟
الجواب: الكافر غير الذمي اذا منح الامان علي نفسه وماله من قبل المسلمين بعقد امان او صلح او عهد او نحو ذلك فهو محترم النفس والمال بمعني انه لا يجوز قتله واخذ امواله مادام الامان باتاً واما غيره فان كان محاربا ً للاسلام والمسلمين يسعي في الاضرار بهم والوقيعة فيهم فلا اشكال في عدم احترام نفسه وماله نعم ربما يحرم قتله واخذ امواله لعنوان ثانوي طاريء ككون ذلك موجباً للاضرار بالمسلمين من حيث تحريض الكفار علي الاعتداء عليهم ونحو ذلك، واما من لم يكن محاربا ً فان دعي الي الاسلام ولم يستجب كان في حكم الحربي واما قبل عرض الاسلام عليه فلا يجوز اخذ امواله.

Sayyid Sistani clearly says non-dhimmi doesn't mean harbi, it includes those who have peaceful relationship/treaties with Muslims.
Also, he says in some cases it's forbidden to kill even harbi kafir. As I wanted to show the difference between takfiris and mainstream Shia, that would be more than enough.


http://ur.abna24.com/cultural/archive/2013/09/26/466912/story.html
جتنا ممکن ہو ہندوں کے ہاتھ سے کھانے سے پرہیز کریں۔ جہاں مجبوری ہے وہاں کوئی چارہ نہیں ہے۔ البتہ میں آپ کی خدمت میں عرض کروں کہ آیت اللہ مکارم شیرازی ہندوستان کے ہندوں کو پاک سمجھتے ہیں 
http://ur.abna24.com/cultural/archive/2013/09/26/466911/story.html
جو چیزیں پیکٹ میں بند ہیں اگر چہ ہندو فیکٹریوں کی بنی ہوں انہیں استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے چونکہ فکٹریوں میں مشینوں سے کام ہوتا ہے۔ اور اگر کہیں کسی کافر ہاتھ لگتا بھی ہے تو ہمیں چونکہ اس کا علم نہیں ہے لہذا وہ پاک ہونے کا حکم رکھتی ہیں۔ لیکن ہندو کے ہاتھ سے خریدی گئیں مائع دار چیزیں جیسے دودھ، آئس کریم، تیل وغیرہ جو مایع ہوتی ہیں اور ہاتھ لگنے سے نجس ہو جاتی ہیں جبکہ ان کا پاک کرنا ممکن نہیں ہے نجس ہیں ایسی چیزوں کو ہندو کے ہاتھ سے لینے سے پرہیز کرنا چاہیے۔ بلکہ ان کے متبادل بند پیکٹ میں بھی یہ چیزیں ملتی ہیں۔ انہیں استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے۔ کلی قاعدہ یہ ہے کہ پیکٹ میں بند چیزوں کو استعمال کر سکتے ہیں اس کے علاوہ جہاں تک ممکن ہو مسلمان کے ہاتھ سے خریدیں، بنانے والے سے ہمیں مطلب نہیں


https://www.al-islam.org/islamic-business-ethics-sayyid-muhammad-rizvi/your-customers
This sanctity of the property (mal) is not just for Muslims; it includes the non-Muslims also. There is a very well-known law in the shari' a which says that the mal of the al-kafir al-harbihas no sanctity. (Al-kafir al-harbi means a non-Muslim who is at war against Islam and Muslims, and thus is not covered by any agreement with a Muslim government.)
Some Muslims who have migrated to the West use this law concerning al-kafir al-harbi as an excuse to steal, whenever the opportunity avails itself, the property of the non-Muslims. I have always strongly discouraged this behavior based on two reasons:
Firstly, on a social level, living as minority, a Muslim's actions reflect on the community at large; therefore, one should not do so.
Secondly, on a personal level, greed is a dangerous moral disease that pushes one to commit such acts. By committing such acts, one starts to lose the sense of respecting the property of other people: today it is the non-Muslim; tomorrow it will be the non-practicing Muslim!
More importantly, not all non-Muslims are al-kafir al­harbi. Besides al-kafir al-harbi, there are three other categories of non-Muslims:
Al-kafir adh-dhimmi: a religious minority citizen of a Muslim government.
Al-kafir al-mu’ahid: a non-Muslim whose government has a treaty with a Muslim government.
Al-kafir al-mutahayid or al-kafir al-musta'min: a neutral non-Muslim who is neither fighting against Muslim nor covered by a treaty.
Non-Muslims in the West are either al-kafir al-mu 'ahid or al-kafir al-mutahayid, al-musta'min - and the life and property of such non-Muslims are as sacrosanct as that of the Muslims.
Recently, questions on the sanctity of the mal of non-Muslims have been raised with the contemporary religious authorities in the Shi'a world. All, in their different ways, have said that the sanctity of mal of covers the non-Muslims amongst whom we live in the West.2

https://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00412.html
MUSLIMS  ARE NOT ALLOWED TO EAT AT HINDUS RESTAURANTS UNTIL AND UNLESS YOU
ARE ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN THAT THE STAFF INVOLVED IN THE CLEANING AND COOKING
ARE MUSLIMS AND THAT THE HINDU OWNERS HAVE NO PART IN THAT.

AS FOR GROCERIES, PACKED FOOD AND THOSE THAT CAN BE WASHED BEFORE COOKING
LIKE VEGETABLES IS ALRIGHT. THE ONLY FOOD YOU CANNOT BUY IS THE COOKED FOOD.


WASSALAAM,

MUSTAFA JAFFER

https://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00518.html
The ruling by the 'ulama is that kuffar are najis. Hence, unless one is in
a life threatening situation, one cannot consume their food. 

Although it may not be easy to do so, you can excuse yourself or explain to
them that there are certain religious restrictions which prevent you from
consuming their food.
 

https://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00202.html
As for the food of the Hindus, if they have prepared it then it is Najis. If
there is any doubt in its preparation or it is packed from a store and the
ingredients are not Najis, then you may consume it.
 
 
 
 

http://www.ltakim.com/articles/Shiilawwest.htm
 " Al-Sharif al-Murtada (d. 1044), for example, argues that non-Muslim food is prohibited on the basis of verses 6:118-121 and 9:28.32 Before the time of Al-Murtada, most scholars did not consider the people of the book as intrinsically impure.33
For Al-Murtada, and for many scholars after him, non-Muslim food, including that of the people of the book, was prohibited due to their impurity. His contemporary, Muhammad ibn Hasan Tusi (d. 1067) also links verse 9:28 with impurity. He further states that Jews and Christians are to be treated as mushriks (associators) due to their beliefs regarding Ezra and Jesus, compromising thereby the strict monotheism of Islam.34 However, as Ayatollah JannÁti has argued, many Shi‘a jurists also argued for the purity of the ahl al-kitab.35"
...... Jurists like Fadlullah and Makarim-Shirazi consider not only the people of the book but all human beings to be intrinsically pure. 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)